Napisano od Inshallah12, 11.02.2020 at 15:48
Napisano od Same, 11.02.2020 at 15:43
Napisano od Inshallah12, 11.02.2020 at 15:32
Napisano od Same, 11.02.2020 at 15:28
First of all. Your arguments are not even trustworthy.
Napisano od Black Israelite, 11.02.2020 at 14:11-He has done a fantastic job tutoring the Red.Army clan lowest ranking members to participate in clan wars. This can be productive for new users asking for help.
I will just leave this screenshot without even telling anything.
Secondly, Getting 16 upvotes but being supported by only 3-4 people on forum... Looks suspicious and I actually felt like most of those upvotes were provided by private messages. Something like this: "Hi man, upvote this pls".
Last but not least, "Getting kicked off of staff because of his past actions". If that was even a case, why would ST would like to give him a chance after all?
For me, this drama just shows exactly how "Red.Army has matured over the years".
We should absolutely respect your opinion.
However the goal of the topic was not to exonerate Red.Army from past actions, but to underline that his punishment could extent to multiple moderators. If you equate the liability/ asset that he is in the game,the forum and new players, there is no reason why he should be demoted from his supporter position other than personal vendettas.
Now I have different questions.
1. How do you or anyone out of the staff can even know Red.Army was demoted before talking to multiple moderators?
2. Are we reading different topics?
As I read through the topic, what I realized was nothing but just a drama.. Although he mentioned "this wasn't meant to argue the demotion" his arguments just made it to look like exactly arguing.
You didn't take much time to develop your arguments did you?
1. How do you or anyone out of the staff can even know Red.Army was demoted before talking to multiple moderators?
We saw his circle removed and on his profile it didn't say "supporter" anymore :/
2. Are we reading different topics?
You are the one making it into drama. This is a legitimate discussion between players on whether or not a player is valuable to be reinstated as a supporter. If you disagree, please provide proof (which you have not) and state your case, instead of insulting your way to become legitimate.
Citat:but to underline that his punishment could extent to multiple moderators.
Napisano od Inshallah12, 11.02.2020 at 15:32
Napisano od Same, 11.02.2020 at 15:28
First of all. Your arguments are not even trustworthy.
Napisano od Black Israelite, 11.02.2020 at 14:11-He has done a fantastic job tutoring the Red.Army clan lowest ranking members to participate in clan wars. This can be productive for new users asking for help.
I will just leave this screenshot without even telling anything.
Secondly, Getting 16 upvotes but being supported by only 3-4 people on forum... Looks suspicious and I actually felt like most of those upvotes were provided by private messages. Something like this: "Hi man, upvote this pls".
Last but not least, "Getting kicked off of staff because of his past actions". If that was even a case, why would ST would like to give him a chance after all?
For me, this drama just shows exactly how "Red.Army has matured over the years".
We should absolutely respect your opinion.
However the goal of the topic was not to exonerate Red.Army from past actions, but to underline that his punishment could extent to multiple moderators. If you equate the liability/ asset that he is in the game,the forum and new players, there is no reason why he should be demoted from his supporter position other than personal vendettas.
Napisano od Black Israelite, 11.02.2020 at 14:11-He has done a fantastic job tutoring the Red.Army clan lowest ranking members to participate in clan wars. This can be productive for new users asking for help.
Napisano od Palmitas, 05.02.2020 at 08:11
If you haven't play a 2v1 against them, you have no life on atWar.
Napisano od Froyer, 01.02.2020 at 12:24
Napisano od Cold Case, 01.02.2020 at 11:23
Napisano od Froyer, 01.02.2020 at 11:14
thats why we call it mechanic you don't know how transport mechanic works
A transport unit carrying a number of other units within the scope of its capacity limitation transportation is move to X from Y
Bridging you have 1 stack using 1 naval unit to pass through water thats not transportation because no unit move the stack.
Maybe if you knew how to bridge you wouldn't say its transportation bro
Sadly for you "bridging" isn't something difficult to do and I certainly know how to do it. However I choose not to use it since it's a bug.
Out of all my previous post you didn't answer a thing. " Oh, it's not transportation cause you don't actually move them! It's... it's.... wait I'll find it... bridging! "
If we are to name any bug or new random move and say it's something different then we may as well call this place utopia.
Pls stop why do u want to ban this "bug" when u can make it a mechanic and improve the gameplay?