Objave u kojima sam citiran

Ello. I from Mother Russia and I found these new western videos

Nyet.

Remember what you learned on atwar. It will help you against enemy troops

... casinos cause nothing but depression.

¡SALVE!



If you're an active atwar player and u don't watch Historia Civilis, then u are missing out

You should be able to opt to receive a notification if someone likes one of your forum posts.

Opt, but on by default. All reservations are henceforth invalid.

Why implement this feature? More engagement with forums and increased user integration with community.

Congrats Belligerent on your victory

Look at the top where maps are. Add scenarios then just separate them. Then, guess what? New players might actually know what a fucking scenario is and might realize there is another entire experience to the game that they're missing out on.

This was obviously a case of homicide. Prince Charles had every incentive to become King. He's been waiting so long. He thinks that no one would suspect homicide because the queen was so old. But not me. We will get to the bottom of this

The prequel to Game of Thrones, House of the Dragon, was released last month. And so far, it has exceeded expectations.

Of course, my expectations were low in the aftermath of GoT. But even if I had high expectations, they too would have been exceeded.

Surprisingly, the show is not LGBTQ. There's one black person but they actually integrated him well and he didn't seem like a forced diversity quota, like what they did with Obi-wan Kenobi. The production quality is a lot like Dune. Is it as good as GoT in its prime? No, but it's getting there.

Here's an exclusive sneak-peak of the first King of the Seven Kingdoms in House of the Dragon:

Unleashed made fun of me about my comment, so I have no choice but to disavow it in order to re-gain his respect. Fuck the vice-president of Argentina.

I send my condolences out to the people of Argentina. Their land is beautiful. Some of their people are beautiful. And yet they have to deal with economic and political turmoil.

perhaps you should consider electing a German as prime minister. There are still many Germans from the aftermath of ww2. They could help you solve the political crisis.

You can join back, but first you must see no less than three psychiatrists

Open up the PC betting market

Napisano od Dr. Bright, 22.08.2022 at 21:48

Napisano od Tribune Aquila, 21.08.2022 at 11:51

I came up with this idea first.

https://atwar-game.com//forum/topic.php?topic_id=48400

Yes, I did come up with the idea first.

You have just committed fraud and are now on SP Police probation. You can appeal this sentence at your local church

They cause PTSD, should probably be removed from the game in all honesty

I came up with this idea first.

https://atwar-game.com//forum/topic.php?topic_id=48400

All hail Pavle

I would be a fire bender of the highest order and bring my fire to all the chicks in the realm yo

Napisano od brianwl, 02.08.2022 at 21:45

Napisano od Tribune Aquila, 02.08.2022 at 04:47

That has not been proven at all, I would like the idea that there is a fundamental minimum length and time that cannot be divided further but that's contrary to what science has thus far proven and to basic intuition....

You used the word 'proven' which is problematic in science. Proofs can be used in math and legal fields, but science is evidence based. (i.e. nothing can be "proven" in science.)


1. Nothing in science is 'proven' until all possible observations have been made.
2. Not all possible observations have been made.
3. Therefore, general accepted principle in science is nothing can be proven.
4. You claim "that's contrary to what science has thus far proven".

3 and 4 are incompatible.

Have you ever contemplated the definition of a troll?

I'll reconsider if you can show any evidence to the contrary, but after a brief search, i can confirm every attempt at finding a length less than a planck length has failed... if you know something scientists don't, let it be published!

♥

Brian, between you and me (and everyone), no this is not a troll post. But I'm glad that there is some activity usually no one even reads the first sentence. I wrote this all down in a stream of consciousness after I was talking to someone in discord the other day. I have no expectation of being taken seriously, I just would rather post my thoughts on here rather than a notepad no one will ever read.

With a completely sober review of my understanding of the matter vs yours, I still side with myself simply because there is not sufficient reason to believe (in my eyes) that the Planck length is the smallest possible length (or any other Planck unit). Instead, the notion seems to be to be the byproduct of the much more common understanding that the Planck length is the smallest possible unit that is 1. useful to humans and 2. able to be investigated by humans.

Interestingly, here seems to be the science behind the notion of the Planck length:
1. It is not empirically derived or verified by experiments.
2. According to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, it is meaningless to try to distinguish two points apart at the scale beyond the Planck length
3. If we try to investigate any distance smaller than one Planck length (i.e., sending photon through it), a black hole would form due to the energy of the photon and the limitedness of the space we try to confine the photon in. The relative measurements would be so extreme at that scale that it would form a black hole, in theory.
All from this. Doesn't seem like a highly sophisticated paper but it contains a sufficient review of the literature (cntrl + F https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=LitRC&u=googlescholar&id=GALE|A642619938&v=2.1&it=r&sid=googleScholar&asid=e2abb2f0)



If space-time was treated as flat at the scale of the Planck length, then that would imply that there is clearly the other side of this triangle has a value lower than 1 Planck in length. Space-time, however, at this level is not treated as flat. Instead, it's fuzzy zone of quantum mechanical gobbidy goo that nobody understands. It is simply not useful to humans to investigate a smaller possible length and the Planck length coincides with a number of limits to the ability for humans to investigate any further. Of course, intuitively it seems that when contemplating quantum mechanics, it still seem as though there is no real limit to the smallest length, but is instead an asymptote with a few investigative limits.

Instead of asserting that the Planck length is not the smallest possible length, I should instead assert that no one on Earth knows (but it is probably the case that she ain't the smallest). Instead, we know that the Planck length is useful to treat as a base unit. And because we simply do not know, and because the possibility fits so well with my other bullet points, I've decided to include it simply as an observation. Again, the original post was a stream of consciousness where I just list a series of observations that seem to bother me. I think it's important to be cognizant of these really profound philosophical questions, and the implications of one being the case over the other, in our everyday lives. Mankind is still so early in its existence and I'm so excited to see where this century takes us in terms of addressing some of these super basic questions. I like to try and question these frameworks because, in all likelihood Brian, the frameworks that we've established thus far are wrong. Mankind has only been truly cognizant about the stars and the physics around us for a few hundred years. Every year that goes by is one year before the next million or more (assuming no self-annihilation inter alia).

Napisano od brianwl, 01.08.2022 at 22:55

Napisano od Tribune Aquila, 31.07.2022 at 21:58

I believe it important that we, as a complex entities with complex minds, seriously contemplate the nature of reality at all times, and allow this contemplation to guide our everyday actions.
...

Not sure if this is troll bait... but i liked your opening, and agree with it, so will respond on philosophical grounds. However i only got to the first bullet point before realizing you either were trolling or haven't done much contemplation, so i'll just address your first bullet before reading further:

You claim:

"There is no limit to the smallest unit of space or time. We can zoom in and out of space and time indefinitely. For example, we can divide a "second" by half an infinite amount of times. This property of reality seems to indicate that there is nothing truly fundamental about space or time; instead, there are only approximations of space and time. I will use this as evidence that we, at least, cannot invalidate the notion of the block universe."

Of course this has been known to be false for over a century now... both for planck length and planck time. You mentioned time. Planck time constant was determined around 1900 according to most credible sources. Since time can be quantized, it is consistent with the 'simulation hypothesis' (i.e. that we are living in a video game) and these quantized units represent the limits of the processor running our particular game (in much the same way video games have quantized pixels for length, and frame rates for time.)

What's really amazing about this, is that because time can't be divided indefinitely, the system is REAL. (An infinite system can't be real, since infinity doesn't exist in reality.) So because the system is finite, it can be defined, and is therefor real... chew on that for a moment of existential contemplation, as once you do a bit more research to fact check, you'll likely have a major shift in your world view.

♥

That has not been proven at all, I would like the idea that there is a fundamental minimum length and time that cannot be divided further but that's contrary to what science has thus far proven and to basic intuition. Our efforts at probing an even smaller length or unit of time just become infinitely more difficult, it's not that it's not possible. It's just a coincidence that it is the length beyond which any determination is both not useful to humans and unable to be seriously determined without an enormous amount of energy.

Interestingly, if the same equation to find the Planck length is used to find the "Planck mass", then you will find that the equation returns micrograms. The Planck length is completely arbitrary but useful

There's a difference between the hypothesis of a minimum measurable length which seems reasonable, and the hypothesis of a minimum length, period. The point that we can zoom in and out infinitely is highly relevant, and I think it is compatible with the notion of a simulation hypothesis. Beyond my first point, my second point addresses the notion of frame rates and why they aren't exact. They're "fuzzy", as I put it. I think it's really tempting to try to fit constants into one's world view, but when everything becomes fuzzy, that's what I found interesting in my contemplation

I believe it important that we, as a complex entities with complex minds, seriously contemplate the nature of reality at all times, and allow this contemplation to guide our everyday actions.

To begin this contemplation, let's consider the following observations:

There is no limit to the smallest unit of space or time. We can zoom in and out of space and time indefinitely. For example, we can divide a "second" by half an infinite amount of times. This property of reality seems to indicate that there is nothing truly fundamental about space or time; instead, there are only approximations of space and time (e.g., Planck length). I will use this as evidence that we, at least, cannot invalidate the notion of the block universe.

There is no such thing as a "real" definition of an object in the universe. For example, let's try to define "human." It's a entity like you, right? Well, that's not exactly clear. For a moment, let's treat "you," plus a small amount of space around you, as a closed system. Then, let's take each "atom" in the system and observe the number of arrangements of them that are possible in the closed, three-dimensional space. This number is so large that it appears infinite, but it is in fact finite. One of the arrangements includes you with a detached arm, one of them includes you with a chunk of your brain attached to your foot, etc. Which among these arrangements is human? Thus, this experiment presents to us an additional property of reality, which is that all objects are "fuzzy" and undefined. No definition established by a human describes the true nature of reality (space or time), they are just fuzzy approximations.

To support the point above, let's also consider the notion of a certain child predator who, upon the removal of a brain tumor, lost his urge to behave as a pedophile. This indicates that the brain is in fact just as mundane as any other material in the universe. Thus, re-arranging atoms in the brain to other parts of the closed system do not invalidate our attempt at defining the human; there is no divine essence which the atoms in the brain do not by themselves account for.
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/pedophile-lost-urge-after-surgery-flna1c9478663
https://www.smh.com.au/world/nightmare-experience-for-man-whose-cancer-turned-him-into-a-pedophile-20021231-gdg1iz.html

All humans look like ape-like creatures. This is particularly true with respect to females. I notice in my day-to-day life that females share a very similar facial structure. Some humans appear to share facial characteristics similar to that of an orangutan, and this is especially common in western societies, which is the society that I've engaged the most with. Search "female" and then closely observe the characteristics of their faces, and you'll quickly notice a pattern that is difficult to observe in our own species, but is unmistakably true across all species, including our own. This is something that I've noticed in recent years, as I've become more cognizant of my environment.

One thought always leads to another. Try this experiment out for yourself. There is no such thing as randomness. All thoughts are stimulated by casual reality. Try to think of something that you did last year (2021). What day do you think of? What do you think you did on that day? What do you remember, specifically, about that day? These thoughts are all causally linked. One thought leads to another. There is no randomness to your thoughts. Your initial thought was prompted by the fact that that day was particularly memorable for whatever reason. It was a "core" memory, so to speak, which lodged itself in a specific set up relationships between the neurons in your head. It might be hard to explain, exactly, what that specific day became a core memory—a pattern that I've noticed with many of my own core memories.

The impulse, which some of us have, to eat, lash out at others, defecate, or even the impulse to refrain from eating and instead fast, or even the impulse to meditate and, accordingly, refrain from engaging in activities that induce dopamine, are all prompted by causal reality. Causal reality is impossible to compute in all its complexity for the average human mind. Like the rings that develop on a tree that indicate its age, our minds store memory through an causal organic process, but in a far more complex way. However, despite the relative complexity we have in contrast to other species, our memory is no where near enough to compute the complexity of causal reality, which is why we do not realize its existence in our day-to-day lives.

Rome and Spain. Human society, all human behavior, and all human motivation can be thought of as analogous to my idea of "Rome and Spain"; furthermore, all human behavior and motivation can be predicted by this analogy. What do I mean by this analogy? Well, let's consider the late Roman republic. Then, let's consider the province of Espana, or "Spain." Let's consider a family that lives on the coast, near the border of Gaul. Then, let's consider an individual who is part of the family. Let's consider a man who we will name Paulinus. This man is a function of causal reality and, accordingly, will develop relationships with other entities bound by causal reality. Some of these entities he considers part of his family, community, and the broader causal network which binds all humans. Thus, this brings us to an important point: human society is bound by a predictable causal network. The human entity, which arises from complex arrangement of chemical reactions, interacts with other human entities, forming what one might consider a macroscopic causal network which binds each entity not unlike the less complex, but nevertheless causal arrangements which give rise to a human entity like Paulinus.

Referring back to the example: Paulinus has an abstract, casual link with other humans that include his mother, father, and friends. As Einstein pointed out, space and time are not absolute, but rather relative; so, with respect to Paulinus, these links are strong. He is the center of the sapien causal network. He may position himself within the causal network according to the stimuli which his parents impart on him; to brush his teeth in a specific way, to eat certain types of foods, to talk with a certain accent. Other stimuli may be derived from evolutionary structures from within him—the urges and whatnot that the typical human will have. Combined, these stimuli position each human within the network. If we observe each human in the broader network, then we will notice that there are epicenters where causality seems more complex and where the stimuli which occur in smaller communities may be extrapolated to much larger communities, and even segments of the entire network itself (i.e., western civilization, eastern civilization, Africa, etc.). These thoughts are extremely abstract, but let's try to visualize them:

I share with you in the image below, a crude representation of the causal network which binds all humans:


Interestingly, this representation also corresponds to what Earth looks like from outer-space at night. I did not realize this until after-the-fact, but this is certainly an even better representation of the causal link which binds human society:


Furthermore, this representation shares similar characteristics to a neural network as well as the broader cosmic web, identified by astonomers; "The Quantitative Comparison Between the Neuronal Network and the Cosmic Web": https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2020.525731/full


My vague understanding of the universe combined with this data indicates that there is substance behind the view of the block universe.

The panhandler who lives outside of my apartment complex. His mind functions at a much slower pace than the typical human; accordingly, his actions are highly predictable and I would suspect entirely pre-determined.

If the block universe is true, then my contemplation of it or knowledge that it is in fact true would not imply that I have any special authority over the nature of the block universe. I am, like anyone else, simply responding to external stimuli.

The enormity of "time" which lies ahead of us.

The small amount of "time" which lies before us.

The mystery surrounding the origin of all things.

Time is not simply the thing which prevents everything from happening all at once, for it has all already happened. Time is, in the words of Einstein, an "illusion." Causal reality can be thought of as a 4-dimensional field that consists of the causal assortment of space where causality simply innervates the system for whatever reason; accordingly, the system is simply a predictable block (block universe).

I think it quite strange that, even when presented with these serious questions that concern the nature of reality, which we seem to be on the cusp of understanding, we do not consider these things at all times and allow them to guide our everyday actions. As I've contemplated these ideas over the years, I've slowly grown less concerned with political systems and more concerned with establishing "order" in a broader sense. Our purpose should be to establish order in the network and provide for ourselves as much time and resources as possible to allow for a higher number of reactions to the stimuli that concern these thoughts, so that we may validate or invalidate them. I think that we should all aim for this: collect resources, allow for as much time in life as possible, and establish public order so that we may discover such things in an efficient manner in an era of peace and stability.

This post is true

Hello,

Martin Shkreli live streams everyday, ever since he got out of prison last month. He garners approximately 200 viewers at any given moment. He usually tinkers with excel, monitors the stock market, and plays online browser games like chess and snake.

One of the browser games I've been tyring to get him to play is atWar, but I need more people to help me convince him to play while he's live streaming. Here's his YouTube channel, come on sometime tomorrow and we'll get him on. He would have an enormously positive impact on the community:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjYKsjt-7EDU78KEcVbhYnQ

Napisano od Tribune Aquila, 15.10.2021 at 16:39

Napisano od ITSGG1122, 15.10.2021 at 11:36

it just so happens that I've been doing a lot of research into this in the past week. In my opinion, it is worth treating services like BlockFi or Voyager the same as you would treat your typical savings account.

Recently, I've decided to put all my savings (and day trading capital) into a combination of USDC and GUSD, each earning 7% APR ($35,000.00/year per 500k invested... crazy). In my situation, I have just 25% of my money in the account. But I think it is possible to earn 7% APR on my full net worth by wiring the funds every evening from my brokerage account with Charles Schwab to my BlockFi account, and then wiring from my BlockFi account to my Charles Schwab account every morning (I got banned from TD Ameritrade for no reason), so that way I'm able to accrue interest by simply holding the funds overnight in my BlockFi account, while trading the funds and fully liquidating them during the day. I'm currently in the process of doing this, but clearly I need to make sure I don't get blocked for suspicious activity

There are many risks involved. First of all, I chose to combine my funds in two stablecoins, USDC and GUSD, because they are much more transparent than USDT and are apparently fully backed by $$$. This is how I diversify. As for the stability of the coins themselves, there are two articles here to consult: https://medium.com/coinmonks/how-well-do-the-top-stablecoins-perform-a-quantitative-analysis-c56d022719b and https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/2020-conference-paper-lyons-viswanath-natraj.pdf. There is a lot of risk and the system could collapse entirely. There will be future regulations and there is a lot of uncertainty

Second of all, it is important to note that you're not actually earning 7% (you would earn 8.25% with smaller amounts of money), but rather a little less than 7% because of some kind of expense ratio I assume. This takes away about 1.5k for every 500k you invest with BlockFi.

Third of all, choosing the right platform. There are several, but the two best ones are BlockFi and Voyager. Voyager gives you higher interest rates but has fewer assets under management. So if the cryptocurrency market were to collapse, Voyager would go down first. BlockFi is much more reliable. These platforms are able to profit by lending to businesses that specialize in crypto. Traditional banks are unwilling to loan money to those businesses, so BlockFi is able to charge them exorbitantly high interest rates with the funds that we deposit. And because there's competition, they kindly give us 7% APR (otherwise, everyone would go to Voyager). Of course, the risk is that if the cryptocurrency market collapsed, those businesses would default, and then there wouldn't be money backing our deposits. Then, we could have a bank run and you could lose literally your entire account that is not FDIC insured. I expect something to this effect might happen before 2024, which is why I will always be fully liquid and be prepared to withdraw my money on even the slightest hint that default is imminent. I will try to track this with more quantitative measures later, but for now here's no reason to worry since bitcoin is literally almost at all time highs right now.

I refuse to put any of my money in cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum. However, if you purchase 10,000 voyager coins, you could earn an additional 1% APR on your stablecoins, which makes Voyager a lucrative option if you are able to tolerate greater risk.

Voyager just declared bankruptcy and everyone's money is lost. Good thing I only used BlockFi. Sorry if I convinced any of you to invest in Voyager, because now you are bankrupt

Looks like Musk doesn't want it. I took a short position at $34.80 after hours, then I took profit at $33.90. I re-entered my position at $34.60 and I will hold the position long-term, with the expectation that the deal will not go through and that, as a result, the share price will be at around $15 end of year, or at most around $30 end of year if the litigation is inconclusive for awhile.

Search edgar/SEC/Elon Musk and subscribe to his filings, then go to your gmail settings, then go to "Filters and Blocked Addresses," then create a new filter that forwards notifications from the SEC to your phone's email address which you can find out about on your carrier's website, in order to get notified via text before everybody else when shit goes down.

Edit: left position

Bump

Do AP biology exam now

An uncanny correlation that I've noticed is that ever since Unleashed was banned, atwar has been in terminal decline. Perhaps a solution we could try is temporarily unbanning Unleashed to see if that causes an increase in activity figures

Napisano od DeepFriedUnicorn, 25.06.2022 at 11:36

So now that USA is failing the female and human rights. Can like, other countries invade them now?

Don't talk about females like you know them. I've encountered countless females throughout my life, and all of them (I'm sure) would not want to abort because abortion is fraught with waste. It wastes perfectly good baby meat. Why would you take out the fetus when you could have an entire baby + milk?

I am glad that the Supreme Court came to the decision that it did. It is America's last respectable federal institution.

Atwar music is the best and there really isn't any other music that is needed for maps, you just have bad taste if you think that