Nove objave

He is known for raping women and supporting genocide.


post any info below

Casca reading this:

I cant help but notice that the "french" flag when choosing "french" as a language on the home screen is wrong. The "french" "president" changed the blue to a darker shade. This is outright ridiculous and needs to be brought to light. Imagine if the English language was displayed with an American flag or if "croatian" was represented at all as a real distinct language.

Say Free Palestine and he will unban

Napisano od 10GRI, 15.09.2025 at 14:16

Unban my bro ihy you scen ratas

shut up lil bro

I support the ban

Unban my bro ihy you scen ratas

Weisser wolf just continues proving how toxic he is . Calling scen retarded cuz he has no skill at all while being rank 16 . Please ban him

10GRI > opi

Napisano od Weisser Wolf, 15.09.2025 at 10:46

And? those are only battles on the game, what is the point of you posting this, TEMPEST?

who is tempest? my name is kitty

And? those are only battles on the game, what is the point of you posting this, TEMPEST?

This is ihy btw

Mapmaker: [Estus]
Reason for the ban: "Toxicity" against the map isn't a valid reason for banning as i didn't abuse any rules of the scen:





Reason for the appeal: The ban isn't justified, there are literally dailly shit talkings on any WWI game about ballance, counters, bad playing, etc. If he is true to this cause, near all WWI communitry would be banned at this point.

I am writing to request that my ban from the map created by Estus be reviewed and removed. I was banned after stating that the map needs balance and noting that toxic behavior is common there. I believe this ban was arbitrary and inconsistent with the map rules, and I ask that you lift it or require the mapmaker to justify it with evidence.

Why the ban should be lifted

Even if my comment looks "toxic", it is not a personal attack. Banning a player solely for pointing out balance issues (even if its redacted like trash/shit talking or shitposting) is effectively a personal or content-based punishment rather than enforcement of a clear rules violation. According to the published rules, a mapmaker's ban power is limited and regulated. Estus's action conflicts with those limits (see rules cited below).

"If the mapmaker claims a rules violation, the rules require evidence." No evidence has been provided to me or to moderators (to my knowledge), that i have been explicitly abusing glitches or scenario mechanics to personal gain. This was solely a ban motivated by his hating for feedback about balance; and as i said before, near all players who play WWI at one point trashtalks about the scenario itself complaining about unballanced units/factions"

Relevant rule citations and how they apply to my appeal:

Rule 7.1 — "The mapmakers have the privilege to ban a player ...; however, the mapmakers are not allowed to ban a player on a map/scenario for personal reasons or not describing the reasons for the ban."
Estus banned me after I commented on balance. Even if that sounds "toxic", that appears to be a personal or content-based ban (silencing feedback) and was issued without a clear, described reason. This directly conflicts with 7.1.

Rule 7.2 — "Players are assumed innocent ... It is up to the map maker to provide substantial evidence when asked to do. Map makers who fail to do so will have to lift the ban, if the map makers refuses to comply moderators will lift the ban."
No substantial evidence of any rule-breaking on my part has been presented.

Under 7.2, the burden is on Estus to provide proof of me abusing mechanics or something about the scenario itself; failing that, the ban should be lifted or moderators should intervene.

If 1 IF inf has 4 attack, lets say with equal stack bonuses it will roll a random value from 1 to 4, that would be 25% chance to roll 1.

In that video, you can see a battle (0:10 to 0:16) where 10 IF infs rolled 1s on 1 GC inf non stop. Now, because there should be a big stack bonus advantage for the attacker, we can assume the chance to roll 1s in attack is even lower - for simplicity, lets say its around 10%

So the attacker rolled 1s non stop, while the GC inf has 8 HP. That means you have to get an event that has ~10% chance of happening 8 times in row.

That means 0.1 to the power of 8, which means 1 in 100 million. Just so you guys understand how insane it is.

My intentions have always been to create a more fun environment for everyone. Don't take this as a personal attack, but rather a response to the numerous reports I've received regarding this incident. I'm sure your intention wasn't to harm anyone; you weren't even present during the thing. This was simply my response to the disruption caused to that game.

It's unfortunate that the matter has reached this point, and I regret that it remains unresolved. However, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, so you are no longer banned.

Estus has my support

ESTUS account: https://atwar-game.com/users/profile.php?user_id=213755

My account: https://atwar-game.com/users/profile.php?user_id=1198950

This is just getting weirder. Estus is unreal, why is he even a supporter, if he thinks I am hacking the game, he should report me to a moderator. This is just stupid. Please unban:

Invalid reason.

losing 2 inf vs 1 cons is normal
losing 2 inf vs 1 destroyer is normal

Especially if you consider strategies

https://prnt.sc/X0nBz6sfvYIf

the youtube link in his screenshot: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOriliTdMi8

I hope a moderator talks with him.

Bro, just create your own game at this point.

Yes

Pls im only 10 protocoins

Napisano od ITSGG1133, 13.09.2025 at 12:39

...

Napisano od Weisser Wolf, 13.09.2025 at 15:44

...

Unbanned both since no screenshot as evidence was provided. Please note he may reban you any time if he can provide a screenshot with evidence.

Pls unban him and UNBAN ME

Please dont unban him

Invalid reason: https://prnt.sc/80ncVuRUDlJF
Account: https://atwar-game.com/users/profile.php?user_id=1198950

Mapmaker: https://atwar-game.com/users/profile.php?user_id=213755

New Game Starting Now

Asymmetric Warfare VII by Niki

https://atwar-game.com/games/?link=2468529844

1. What's New

Hello everyone. Welcome to the seventh installment of the Asymmetric Warfare series. Lots of major changes in this release including many new units including 18 new ground units, 9 new naval units and a whopping 37 new air units. I plan to feature some of these new units in upcoming releases.

As in previous releases, players will only be able to build defensive units in turns 0 and 1. Units available to build during turns 0 and 1 include General Infantry, Bunkers, SAM anti-aircraft and the Iron Dome anti-missile units. This gives all players a chance to set up before the bgame begins.

2. Featured Unit

The featured unit for this release has to be the Gerald R. Ford nuclear powered aircraft carrier. Fully loaded it displaces over 100,000 tons making it the largest warships ever. The WWII battleship Yamato clocked in at a paltry 72,000 tons making it look downright small in comparison. In addition to its size, the Gerald R. Ford is one of only two classes of aircraft carriers in the world that are nuclear powered. At full throttle, the Gerald R. Ford can move at speeds of up to 56 kph (35 mph) and run almost indefinitely.

In addition to the Gerald R. Ford, look for best-of-class carriers from China, France, India, Japan, Russia, Spain and the UK.

3. Game Protocols

Please observe the following Game Protocols:
• Unsportsmanlike conduct, personal insults or harassment of other players, will result in the player in question being banned from future games. Think before you post.
• Do not leave a game by timing out. If you have lost the game, surrender.
• Take your turn in a timely manner. Don't be the last player to take your turn every turn.

4. Game Settings

• Starting funds are $50,000.
• Capture the enemy country and hold it for two (2) turns
• Maximum number of initial territories that can be selected is one (1)
• Maximum number of allies is two (2)
• Maximum number of players is fifteen (15)
• Maximum number of turns is two hundred (200)
• Minimum rank is five (5)
• Turn duration is forty-eight (48) hours
• Allow joining until turn three (3)
• Sorry no rejoining.
• Game rule changes requires unanimous consent

5. About Niki

Niki is the largest atWar coalition and one of the only coalitions in atWar that specializes in casual gaming. Take your game to the next level. For more information on how to join, contact myself or any of the coalition Leaders or Officers. Niki, the coalition of choice for casual gamers.

https://atwar-game.com/cln/cln.php?cln_id=639

Good luck to all and enjoy…

Commodus, Founding Leader, Niki

I don't have much freetime right now but since the topic is promoted and there's going to be a lot of people sneaking by, here's a leak of what I'm working on.

I'm planning to add an emulator where you can see randomized battles animated in real time (like in-game), and also fix the internal issues of clovis' calculator by making my own.



Note that there are errors in the debug messages but the underlying logic is working properly. It's a work in progress.

I'm trying to think of a way to implement the order in which the units attack/defend if their atk/def values are equal (I already know how it works, but it is complicated to emulate).

Additionally, here's one of my observations from hours of testing alone and with others, if you're interested.



This can take anywhere from a couple of days now to potentially weeks, depending on how much time I'll have.