Objave u kojima sam citiran

Napisano od Khal.eesi, 26.04.2014 at 13:03

Napisano od ABox, 26.04.2014 at 12:43

Also eesi- why the hell do we even have a feedback and suggestions forum? I'm not implying I should rule it, I'm just putting my suggestions out.

well im just messing with you hue, but you did request for a complete overhaul, but this game wouldnt be atwar anymore,now, would it?also its fine to give specific suggestions but dude comments like this game is so boring or so hard are gardevoir-cry-type comments..and nobody can take them seriously

My nigga gardevoir backing me up

Seriously though, I wasn't calling for a overhaul of the whole game, just walls. That alone would make the game a bit more interesting rather than just walling and wallfucking for twenty hours.

Napisano od Flaming Spaz, 26.04.2014 at 12:41

Your second point is totally wrong. I think you forgot the beginners room bud.

So in any late game I just can't build 10 quintillion walls and win it/make the game last for 500 turns? Shit, wallfucks are nearly necessary now- except there's a huge shitstorm when people do it.

Napisano od bullet86, 26.04.2014 at 12:31

Napisano od Khal.eesi, 26.04.2014 at 12:14

Napisano od ABox, 26.04.2014 at 12:05

Shitty communities are on every single free internet game fucking ever. It's either that or they're dead communities. Maybe they're both shitty and dead communities.

I do think game mechanics need a bit of an overhaul regarding walls. If I had to take the option of AW with walls and AW without walls, I'd take AW without walls. Make some strats actually worth something. AW doesn't really favor defensive strats- you just sorta expand the fuck out and wall everything.

Also, most scenarios are cancer with little to no balance. RP and other shit sometimes just takes the point of playing AW in the first place. UN was a key example of this- a wargame with no actual warring, just "OH HE LEFT CLAIM NAO GIBE MONIES"

I think the game does need a massive overhaul. Shit communities are everywhere. Shitty games are not.

ironic thing is Abox, you're a RP player your self!

...so? Just because I play a game doesn't mean I can't criticize it for it's faults. Those two aren't mutually exclusive.

Also eesi- why the hell do we even have a feedback and suggestions forum? I'm not implying I should rule it, I'm just putting my suggestions out.

Shitty communities are on every single free internet game fucking ever. It's either that or they're dead communities. Maybe they're both shitty and dead communities.

I do think game mechanics need a bit of an overhaul regarding walls. If I had to take the option of AW with walls and AW without walls, I'd take AW without walls. Make some strats actually worth something. AW doesn't really favor defensive strats- you just sorta expand the fuck out and wall everything.

Also, most scenarios are cancer with little to no balance. RP and other shit sometimes just takes the point of playing AW in the first place. UN was a key example of this- a wargame with no actual warring, just "OH HE LEFT CLAIM NAO GIBE MONIES"

I think the game does need a massive overhaul. Shit communities are everywhere. Shitty games are not.

10

TENNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

Napisano od Amok, 27.06.2013 at 05:19

Get a time machine and travel a few years back, you'll love the game then

but that's hard
time travel is really hard


why can't we just bring back dem features? i loved having my general... you know... when it was free

when i came back got all my SP returned for those upgrades but still... there's an emptiness inside

Hey gaiz


it's the internet

if you don't like it

you know you could

move the mouse to that little red x thingy

and click it


ta da


or even easier


click that little pause thingy


to stop the radio for like

2-3 minutes

then play it again




man people get butthurt over the internet


also, woman on a free online strategy game? who loves anime obsessively and is a communist?



AAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

Napisano od Cpt. Erebos, 27.06.2013 at 00:51

'pornhub.com/meester-takes-it-in-the-keester"

top lel


i liked the death one more, to be honest with ya

also best quote 4evar


"UN is rogue"

You put one guy in front of the city.
Then two guys on the sides positioned really close- like they're right next to each other.


Ta-da, triangle.

Rage comic about AW.

Y I NO MENTIONED?

First- Unless we do serious shit, we aren't going to go to war with China and Russia.
They got North Korea, China, and Russia. We got Europe, India, and almost all of America. (Including Oceana)
Personell- Rough Estimate for the Russians, Chinese, and NKs-
30,000,000 *Including paramilitary
Us-
About 15-20,000,000 *Including Paramilitary
Including the fact we are both evenly matched in Neuclear Weaponry and such, it'd just be a massive killing field.

Second- I feel the US is doing better than the Congo, so I'm fine.

Third- That shit's been done since the 1960's. Unless anyone is acting like we're going to blow up our neighborhood bank, we're fine.

Actually, besides the "OH GOD THEN LET'S TROLOLOLOLOL" this is a viable concern.
Rather.
Few changes to the rules are in order.
Additions and such. Clarifying the rules will help the new members to an infinite extent.

Disbanding units would be a great help.
Not implemented though.
Damn you, Amok and Ivan.

...
They're rare units bro.
Plus nukes, (If population casualties are implimented) would be a huge bomb.
If we could build nuke then every single fuck with a 50K game would just choose a small country then blow the living shit out of everyone.

Aircraft Carriers would be kind of useless.
Transports have the function of carrying troops, and planes can fly on their own.
APCs are also useless. Transport is provided already.
Railways however...
They look OK. You're increasing the movement of land units, which is nice, especially when you're in Russia or another large place.

I don't know how the cities would "regenerate"... if they could, would it be differed with each city level or what?
One question- How are you looking to make the game in the long run? A Civilization-Type game, or just a military strategy game?

It...
Wouldn't work.
Why? Because,
A) WAY TOO MUCH BACKSTABBING
B) Militia, even on GW are mainly defensive units. And this is also time consuming.
Too far off, buddy.

For now, I am kind of pissed off at the fact that premium users get a whole bunch of free ****, but whatever.
Alright, suggestions...
I. Basic Terrain Stuff-
Alright, I get kind of the fact that it's too hard to code, but you can work on it continously. Anyways, so, I can cross the Andes to Peru in a week? To make the game a bit more moldable and expandable, I suggest basic terrain features. At least put a movement cost. I would appreciate a defense system, but please. Terrain features also open up a lot of new updates...
II. Population Casualties
This was suggested back then. We wanted scenarios though. What I want is population casualties, every 3-5 battles fought in the city, 1 population point lost. What does this mean? It means that field battles will become majorly important- no 50 troops in one city, waiting it out. It can either stop when the city gets to one, or the city can be destroyed- (if it was a capital, it stays at one) basically wiping it from the map.
So yeah, hard coding stuff, I'd get it, but some new ones, please.

...

This game is like Rock, Paper, Scissors. It's not open to much strategy at all. If any more units were to be added, we would need terrain specifications. That would be hell for any programmer to input.

It's just really kind of annoying to play "Napoleonic War" and have airplanes and tanks. What I think should be the solution could that you could have the option to remove certain units or maybe change the name and pics. It'd make it a lot more realistic and/or fun. It wouldn't even just have to be a unit addition, it could just be that... Of course, trolls will just put stupid names, but then again, that's just a side effect of the internet, right? Please comment on this idea.