Kupite Premium da sakrijete sve reklame
Objave: 3   Posjećeno od: 22 users
31.07.2012 - 07:14
This should be allowed.
Auto-Declination in peace is not good.
----
I dont understand why people says that Full Package is too expensive:
http://imageshack.us/a/img854/6531/fzhd.png

"I... Feel a little dead inside"
-Gardevoir
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
31.07.2012 - 07:26
Napisano od Guest, 31.07.2012 at 07:21

Napisano od raetahcodeupon, 31.07.2012 at 07:14

This should be allowed.
Auto-Declination in peace is not good.


No. First turn peace was implemented to keep players from rushing each other in turn one, not for them automatically staying at peace for ages. Instead, there should be the possibility of manually keeping peace. Like in turn two the default setting will still be war, but one can still send a peace- or ally-request in turn 1. At the current point it is only possible to send an ally request.

Aparently you didnt undertand me.
When you propose peace and that guy attacks you, the peace is automatically declined.
There should an option to propose a ceasefire even if you attacked or he attacked you.
----
I dont understand why people says that Full Package is too expensive:
http://imageshack.us/a/img854/6531/fzhd.png

"I... Feel a little dead inside"
-Gardevoir
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
31.07.2012 - 09:03
The problem I see in this situation is when the player takes your capital and then he accepts peace, it could bring AW to a whole new level of backstabness. An easier solution is to simply message the player you want to send the request beforehand.
----
"Whenever death may surprise us, let it be welcome if our battle cry has reached even one receptive ear and another hand reaches out to take up our arms".
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
atWar

About Us
Contact

Privatnost | Uslovi korištenja | Baneri | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

Pridružite nam se

Proširi riječ