[23/07/13] ATN: Terminal Can not into title

Here's my question for Primal: How are you?

Is this new or it was existed before?

I don't see how the ''empty plots of land'' are in any way con.
I assume you're either referring to the mountains inside countries, which were added for a more strategic aspect of the map rather than being able to just cross it so easily.
That is really one thing you can delay Hannibal by as Rome or Macedon as Aetolia.
You may be referring to the other large swaths of land like Hispania, Gaul, Thrace and the Seleucid Empire, which, since they had no involvement in the Second Punic War are not included.

And yes... Use Imperialist for the sake of your money.
We even adapted all units to Imperialist in the map, but if we had more range for the units the other Strategies would have worked, which would have been much more effective than picking Imperialist, making it just a bit repetitive.

4/5 Stars, I'll take it! I am glad you like it Terminal lots of effort is put into it and I welcome feedback for balance. Also its part of the "Rise of Rome" series, which is a chronological set of scenarios following Rome's rise.
But as Pyrrhus says

Citat:

We even adapted all units to Imperialist in the map, but if we had more range for the units the other Strategies would have worked, which would have been much more effective than picking Imperialist, making it just a bit repetitive.

Until atwar allows more flexibility with range, we cannot change it.

Napisano od Guest, 23.07.2013 at 18:30

Napisano od Pyrrhus, 23.07.2013 at 18:26

I don't see how the ''empty plots of land'' are in any way con.
I assume you're either referring to the mountains inside countries, which were added for a more strategic aspect of the map rather than being able to just cross it so easily.
That is really one thing you can delay Hannibal by as Rome or Macedon as Aetolia.
You may be referring to the other large swaths of land like Hispania, Gaul, Thrace and the Seleucid Empire, which, since they had no involvement in the Second Punic War are not included.

And yes... Use Imperialist for the sake of your money.
We even adapted all units to Imperialist in the map, but if we had more range for the units the other Strategies would have worked, which would have been much more effective than picking Imperialist, making it just a bit repetitive.

They bothered me xD but yeah i listed it as a con but i didn't really say im giving it a lower score because of it. Good scenario mate, hopefully more people will play it

I just wish leavers were less of a problem for us...

Where is the NC guide you promised :O ?

Napisano od Brandreas, 23.07.2013 at 18:42

Where is the NC guide you promised :O ?

this

Good article, Terminal!

Ehm, Primal why are you such a terrible leader? <3

Primal how often do you tend to annoy other people? (If you annoy LDK, keep it up!)

Napisano od Dbacks, 24.07.2013 at 05:15

(If you annoy LDK, keep it up!)

The other way round, mate. ;3