WW1 Rankism Has Been Defeated

Rankism in WW1 has been defeated. A game with all r4-6 can be completed without any pros and lasted till turn 23.

Lesson: Low-ranks can easily defeat each other and have overcome WW1 Rankism as well as easily fill the game.

Take Home Points: Let Newbs Play WW1, Rankism doesn't get a game to start, Rankist barriers are being pushed and defeated, and Rankism is not beneficial.

Note: Low-Ranks kill each other fast and can learn fast.

>lasted till turn 23

-France,Italy,Greece,Romania left before turn 12. in a map that is suppose to last up to turn 40 if all the players play properly

Napisano od Tundy, 04.08.2015 at 08:11

>lasted till turn 23

-France,Italy,Greece,Romania left before turn 12. in a map that is suppose to last up to turn 40 if all the players play properly

Like I said Low-Ranks dominate eachother fast....
-West Germany invades France and takes trenches- how suicidal!
-Serbia gets wrekt by Austria so bad he leaves.
-Italy gets trolled.
-Romania gets intimidated by Austria.

Awesome! Good to hear.

Looks like low ranks have their own way to play WW1 - That's awesome.

Napisano od clovis1122, 04.08.2015 at 08:36

Awesome! Good to hear.

Looks like low ranks have their own way to play WW1 - That's awesome.

Rankism has never been about low ranks playing low ranks, but about low ranks playing high ranks.
why? because when low ranks use their own way to play, they get DESTROYED by high ranks.

I don't understand why people cry so much about Rankism. If you want to play with the higher ranks then get to rank 7 and you'll fine. A lot of times rank 6's will still play in scenario games with high ranks. People take offense to it as though it is a personal attack against them and their family. All it is, is high ranks wanting to play with other people that have similar skill levels so that a game can be successful.

Besides, low ranks tend to leave more often than high ranks. As pointed out by someone above, your france was afk since turn1. Germany doesn't even get the french cities 9 turns later. Italy, Serbia, and Bulgaria all left by turn 12. If you call this a successful game, then you haven't played a real wwI game or any world war scenario.

Ignoring the r10+ games...

That game looks shitty

Napisano od Dereny, 04.08.2015 at 12:14

I don't understand why people cry so much about Rankism.

nobody is crying here... we are claiming victory over rankism.

Napisano od clovis1122, 04.08.2015 at 20:35

Napisano od Dereny, 04.08.2015 at 12:14

I don't understand why people cry so much about Rankism.

nobody is crying here... we are claiming victory over rankism.

1. There is no victory as it's not a war
2. When someone makes a thread about a failed game and rankism, then he is crying about rankism.

Napisano od clovis1122, 04.08.2015 at 20:35

Napisano od Dereny, 04.08.2015 at 12:14

I don't understand why people cry so much about Rankism.

nobody is crying here... we are claiming victory over rankism.

If anything the pathetic performance of the people in that game reinforces the logic of rankism

Napisano od Dereny, 04.08.2015 at 21:02

2. When someone makes a thread about a failed game and rankism, then he is crying about rankism.

Napisano od clovis1122, 04.08.2015 at 08:36

Looks like low ranks have their own way to play WW1 - That's awesome.

It was not a failed game. They just have their way to play the game. But ok.

Napisano od clovis1122, 04.08.2015 at 08:36

Awesome! Good to hear.

Looks like low ranks have their own way to play WW1 - That's awesome.

notice how the retard of "jimminow" who upvoted you is the same low rank who surrendered as russia turn 5 in a ww2.

Napisano od clovis1122, 05.08.2015 at 08:54

Napisano od Tundy, 05.08.2015 at 08:45

notice how the retard of "jimminow" who upvoted you is the same low rank who surrendered as russia turn 5 in a ww2.

Red = Ad hominen.
Blue = Implying an nonexistent connection between upvotes and a bad behavior (if it even happened).
Yellow = Implying a nonexistent connection between surrendering earlier and low ranks.
Gray = Implying Stating a Fact without evidence.

But oh well, as a moderator would say... "Sometimes you are right, but the form in which you express yourself makes you be wrong"

No clovis, he trolled the ww2 and now he is permanently banned from the map.
the low ranks that support you are the same low ranks that suck and troll games. [this is a fact not a opinion]

Napisano od clovis1122, 05.08.2015 at 09:04

Yeah we are all humans.

No shit clovis.

Napisano od clovis1122, 05.08.2015 at 09:04

Go make your own game if you want selected people to play it.

YOU are bitching about "rankism". literally YOU are the problem, we make our own games and kick low ranks in order to have a nice game while you come here at forum with other low ranks and start bitching about how we should allow low ranks in OUR OWN game.

Seriously clovis i can't believe you are this ignorant

Yeah, no.

Here's a good game engineer that you can use for your game: http://www.cocos2d-x.org/

Napisano od clovis1122, 05.08.2015 at 09:12

Yeah, no.

Here's a good game engineer that you can use for your game: http://www.cocos2d-x.org/

I owned you and your stupid argument, but apparently you are so ignorant that you want to play with semantics in order to be "right"
i had enough of your stupid shit, you are ignored kid.

(BTW, YOU can make your own custom map if you want low rank trolls to play it, i am just going to keep banning the trolls)

Napisano od Tundy, 05.08.2015 at 09:16

I owned you and your stupid argument, but apparently you are so ignorant that you want to play with semantics in order to be "right"
i had enough of your stupid shit, you are ignored kid.

(BTW, YOU can make your own custom map if you want low rank trolls to play it, i am just going to keep banning the trolls)

New color
Gold: Discrepancy between your willing and atWar official Rules.

Napisano od Tundy, 05.08.2015 at 09:16

you are ignored kid.

kthxbye

I love clovis vs tunder fights. Always a pleasure to read

Well he quoted my message twice, I would be a bad person if I ignore him twice.

Napisano od Gandalf The Jew, 05.08.2015 at 14:46

why do you waste your time making a stupid image?, just to argue against a low rank that claim rankism in wwi map has been defeated? do you 'high rank' win anything doing this?

Napisano od clovis1122, 04.08.2015 at 08:36

Awesome! Good to hear.

Looks like low ranks have their own way to play WW1 - That's awesome.

Sucking the dick of low ranks just to get approval, you must play with low ranks so u wont get destroyed by higher ranks like Unleashed in WW2 m8.

About the defeat of WW1 Rankism, let them learn, even tho they played the map badly, not following the structure of the map..

I have to admit... this WW1 map is pretty shitty... all france and germany do is stack a bunch of units next to each other... this is worst than regular RP...

Napisano od Al Fappino, 06.08.2015 at 09:38

Napisano od clovis1122, 04.08.2015 at 08:36

Awesome! Good to hear.

Looks like low ranks have their own way to play WW1 - That's awesome.

Sucking the dick of low ranks just to get approval, you must play with low ranks so u wont get destroyed by higher ranks like Unleashed in WW2 m8.

About the defeat of WW1 Rankism, let them learn, even tho they played the map badly, not following the structure of the map..

My answer is this m8:


Johnehsp and Diedra v Richthofen and Sultan of Swing

I must admit low ranks need help.

#Adopt-A-Newb

Napisano od theFuehrer, 06.08.2015 at 12:04

I have to admit... this WW1 map is pretty shitty... all france and germany do is stack a bunch of units next to each other... this is worst than regular RP...

This is why I like the dynamic of low ranks XD.
They so unpredictable in scenario but easy to wrek in a normal EU.

Austria- Rushed Italy
West Germany- Murdered France
Bulgaria- Murders Serbia with rushing tactics and violates British Greece.
UK- Murdered Bulgaria and tried to stack Germans out. Also takes German trade port. Good Job!
Romania- Has "Oh crud moment" at turn 10.
Russia- Aimlessly sends large stacks to kill Ottoman in Caucasus while stacking St. Petersburg.
Ottoman- Fails at defending his own against newb Russia and Lawrence.
Me- LOL you guys don't do your jobs so I'm gonna wreck Ruski and try to see if I can take all his cities and let him suicide all his troops on me.

Napisano od Diedra, 07.08.2015 at 03:52

Napisano od theFuehrer, 06.08.2015 at 12:04

I have to admit... this WW1 map is pretty shitty... all france and germany do is stack a bunch of units next to each other... this is worst than regular RP...

This is why I like the dynamic of low ranks XD.
They so unpredictable in scenario but easy to wrek in a normal EU.

Austria- Rushed Italy
West Germany- Murdered France
Bulgaria- Murders Serbia with rushing tactics and violates British Greece.
UK- Murdered Bulgaria and tried to stack Germans out. Also takes German trade port. Good Job!
Romania- Has "Oh crud moment" at turn 10.
Russia- Aimlessly sends large stacks to kill Ottoman in Caucasus while stacking St. Petersburg.
Ottoman- Fails at defending his own against newb Russia and Lawrence.
Me- LOL you guys don't do your jobs so I'm gonna wreck Ruski and try to see if I can take all his cities and let him suicide all his troops on me.

My stance stands the same, scenarios need rankism, even tho some low ranks might be reasonably good, a big majority of them arent.
gg on the print tho lmao

Ikr? I've been in rankism

Napisano od War_and_Conquest, 26.11.2020 at 13:01

Ikr? I've been in rankism

why are you talking on a dead form from 2015? also, ww1s fail before t10 in low rank games anyway