The solution to all of Europe's problems

Napisano od Viruslegion, 11.12.2015 at 11:25

Germans were the ones who finally stopped the kebabs

And yet we have 7 million kebabs currently living in germany with more coming in............

but seriously, 90% of fighting was done by balkan countries and hungary, austrians and germans didnt do much.

Napisano od RaulPB, 13.12.2015 at 18:49

Napisano od Autumn, 13.12.2015 at 08:22

Raul, pls stop importing poor people into europe pls

What can I say...? I'm that famous and I also need many workforce for my secret meth labs.... so let them come
If you're interested, you may also join me!

I got my plane ticket, see you tomorrow!

Napisano od Autumn, 13.12.2015 at 20:45

I got my plane ticket, see you tomorrow!

Hope you bring your gloves, you're gonna have to touch much drug in few time... my empire expands to canada from now on as well!!!
Will be expecting you at the entrance of the airport, don't be late

Napisano od Autumn, 13.12.2015 at 08:19

Napisano od Sinjid, 10.12.2015 at 18:45

Besides, who was the catalyst for World War I? Certainly not the United States.


(Gavrilo Princip)

From what I know, Austria is central europe, not balkans. So it was westerners messing in balkans the problem.

Once again, he was a Serbian revolutionary who murdered Franz Ferdinand in Bosnia. The revolutionary sparked the war, but don't get me wrong: Europe was already damned on its own from violence that spanned over the entire continent and into the middle east, Africa, and India.

Napisano od Skanderbeg, 13.12.2015 at 12:36

Napisano od Sinjid, 12.12.2015 at 17:22

Gavrilo Princip was Serbian. He was a member of a Serbian revolutionaries group.

Common mistake made by westerner and their false teaching in the rest of the world.

1. Gavrilo Printsip was born as a Serb, but he declared himself as a Yugoslav, so who are you to judge his nationality? People today chop heads for questioning someones sexuality preferences

2. Gavrilo Printsip was born in Austrian Empire, he had Austrian citizenship and paid taxes in austria and austrian currency

3. Printsip's revolutionary group was called 'Young Bosnia' and seeked independence for Bosnia from Austria. I see no 'Serbia' involved in it

4. Gavrilo assassinated his own leader, on his own territory in his own country. Still i don't see how you involved Serbia into this

5. I wonder, like many historians are saying, why Austria declared war on Serbia for austrian shooting in Austria? Makes no logic. Like 20 years before 1914, when Italian irredentist attempt a murder of Austrian Kaiser, but Austria didn't declare war on Italy.


Weird.

1. You're going to deny what not only the west, but the rest of the world teaches?

2. He proudly called himself Serbian with the revolutionaries. Why would proud Austrians want independence from Austria? I hope you're not sincere but instead trying to gather as much dirt as you can to deny the reality, but if you are sincere, I will make prayers to God, Mecca, the Buddha, and every Hindu god and goddess for them to grant aid upon your mind.

3. Danillo Illic was Bosnian, the other five co-conspirators were Serbian. They were a member of the Black Hand, a group that aimed to unite the Serbians.

4. Again, member of Black Hand, Serbian revolutionary -- if you're sincerely confused, then I honestly feel truly sorry for you. It sounds pompous to state that publicly, but I want to see your reaction. Saying that, I wonder if you will do what everyone else has done: throw back at me what I've thrown at them.

5. There was a lot of unrest in the diverse Austrian Empire. Many opportunists from inside and outside saw Austria's weakness.

Napisano od clovis1122, 11.12.2015 at 19:17

Napisano od Sinjid, 10.12.2015 at 18:45

Besides, who was the catalyst for World War I? Certainly not the United States.

... however, it was the most benefited country in both wars...

Time for conspiracy theories about how the CIA planned both wars?

The conspiracy is the Rothschild family took over america in the 1800 through founding the national reserve conquering America's economy. Through both world wars it used the united kingdom as a means to get involved (there home country) then they financed both sides in both wars making them richer then anyone actually knows (trillions). Basically using the UK to start wars and using america to finish them. Ever wonder how two bitter enemies such as america and uk became cock sucking fags for each other? There is your conspiracy for the day.

Napisano od Sinjid, 13.12.2015 at 21:50

1. You're going to deny what not only the west, but the rest of the world teaches?

Ever heard of globalisation? Few other countries are using Western teaching so it becomes 'universal' for all. Still doesn't mean it is the truth as West is using propaganda since 1850. Read about Crimean War and research english propaganda in that time, how they demonized Russia and twisted facts to gain population support for war to protect decaying Turkey which oppressed christians Russians wanted to save.

Napisano od Sinjid, 13.12.2015 at 21:50

2. He proudly called himself Serbian with the revolutionaries. Why would proud Austrians want independence from Austria? I hope you're not sincere but instead trying to gather as much dirt as you can to deny the reality, but if you are sincere, I will make prayers to God, Mecca, the Buddha, and every Hindu god and goddess for them to grant aid upon your mind.

Nope, he proudly called himself Yugoslav revolutionary. His group was filled with Croat catholics, Orthodox Serbs and Muslim Bosnians(Turks and Muslim Serbs). Their goal was to create Yugoslavia free from Austria and Turkey. Western propaganda tells how they wanted to create 'great serbia' which is illogical when someone check their ranks and see 70% Croats and Muslims.

Napisano od Sinjid, 13.12.2015 at 21:50

3. Danillo Illic was Bosnian, the other five co-conspirators were Serbian. They were a member of the Black Hand, a group that aimed to unite the Serbians.

There is no such thing as 'Bosnian'. There was no 'Bosnian' state back then, so he could not be 'bosnian' citizen', he was Austrian citizen since Austria occupied Bosnia. There is no 'bosnian' ethnicity, Bosnia comprise of Croats, Serbs and Turks&Muslim Serbs(later declared as 'bosniaks' to breakaway from their christian croatian and serbian roots). Therefore your first sentence is not correct. They all lived in Bosnian region in Austria and were Austrian citizens, but different nationality (ethnic group).

Black Hand was group located in Serbia, not Austria. Their goal to defend Serbia from Turkey (funding serbian paramilitaries in turkish occupied macedonia, bulgaria and greece). Saying that Gavrilo Printsip and his associates were members of the the Black Hand is funny, what about Young Bosnia? Or were they members of the both teams?

Napisano od Sinjid, 13.12.2015 at 21:50

4. Again, member of Black Hand, Serbian revolutionary -- if you're sincerely confused, then I honestly feel truly sorry for you. It sounds pompous to state that publicly, but I want to see your reaction. Saying that, I wonder if you will do what everyone else has done: throw back at me what I've thrown at them.

We on the East are used to that. Repeatedly spammed lies becomes the truth according to Nazis, so West is using it today. Serbian revolutionary, unite all 'Serbians', they were 'bosnians', Black Hand, Serb assassination of Austrian prince, Gavrilo Printsip first terrorist. Already seen story. Sad truth is that West ignore facts and doesn't bother informing its population of Austrian parliament discussing invasion of Serbia 88 times from 1890 to 1910, or Conrad von Hozendorf warmongering to invade barbarian backwarded Serbia and finish the occupation of south slavic lands, or Franz Ferdinand parading in the city where majority Serbs live on their holy day.

Napisano od Sinjid, 13.12.2015 at 21:50

5. There was a lot of unrest in the diverse Austrian Empire. Many opportunists from inside and outside saw Austria's weakness.

Austrian Empire conquered so much that they ended up with more non-Austrians in 'Austrian Empire'. That empire was everything but not austrian by population that's for sure. And then assassination happen and they declare war on some other foreign sovereign country. There's logic much as in China declaring war on Egypt when Taiwan attack Chinese coastal fisherman.

Napisano od Skanderbeg, 14.12.2015 at 08:05

Napisano od Sinjid, 13.12.2015 at 21:50

1. You're going to deny what not only the west, but the rest of the world teaches?

Ever heard of globalisation? Few other countries are using Western teaching so it becomes 'universal' for all. Still doesn't mean it is the truth as West is using propaganda since 1850. Read about Crimean War and research english propaganda in that time, how they demonized Russia and twisted facts to gain population support for war to protect decaying Turkey which oppressed christians Russians wanted to save.

Napisano od Sinjid, 13.12.2015 at 21:50

2. He proudly called himself Serbian with the revolutionaries. Why would proud Austrians want independence from Austria? I hope you're not sincere but instead trying to gather as much dirt as you can to deny the reality, but if you are sincere, I will make prayers to God, Mecca, the Buddha, and every Hindu god and goddess for them to grant aid upon your mind.

Nope, he proudly called himself Yugoslav revolutionary. His group was filled with Croat catholics, Orthodox Serbs and Muslim Bosnians(Turks and Muslim Serbs). Their goal was to create Yugoslavia free from Austria and Turkey. Western propaganda tells how they wanted to create 'great serbia' which is illogical when someone check their ranks and see 70% Croats and Muslims.

Napisano od Sinjid, 13.12.2015 at 21:50

3. Danillo Illic was Bosnian, the other five co-conspirators were Serbian. They were a member of the Black Hand, a group that aimed to unite the Serbians.

There is no such thing as 'Bosnian'. There was no 'Bosnian' state back then, so he could not be 'bosnian' citizen', he was Austrian citizen since Austria occupied Bosnia. There is no 'bosnian' ethnicity, Bosnia comprise of Croats, Serbs and Turks&Muslim Serbs(later declared as 'bosniaks' to breakaway from their christian croatian and serbian roots). Therefore your first sentence is not correct. They all lived in Bosnian region in Austria and were Austrian citizens, but different nationality (ethnic group).

Black Hand was group located in Serbia, not Austria. Their goal to defend Serbia from Turkey (funding serbian paramilitaries in turkish occupied macedonia, bulgaria and greece). Saying that Gavrilo Printsip and his associates were members of the the Black Hand is funny, what about Young Bosnia? Or were they members of the both teams?

Napisano od Sinjid, 13.12.2015 at 21:50

4. Again, member of Black Hand, Serbian revolutionary -- if you're sincerely confused, then I honestly feel truly sorry for you. It sounds pompous to state that publicly, but I want to see your reaction. Saying that, I wonder if you will do what everyone else has done: throw back at me what I've thrown at them.

We on the East are used to that. Repeatedly spammed lies becomes the truth according to Nazis, so West is using it today. Serbian revolutionary, unite all 'Serbians', they were 'bosnians', Black Hand, Serb assassination of Austrian prince, Gavrilo Printsip first terrorist. Already seen story. Sad truth is that West ignore facts and doesn't bother informing its population of Austrian parliament discussing invasion of Serbia 88 times from 1890 to 1910, or Conrad von Hozendorf warmongering to invade barbarian backwarded Serbia and finish the occupation of south slavic lands, or Franz Ferdinand parading in the city where majority Serbs live on their holy day.

Napisano od Sinjid, 13.12.2015 at 21:50

5. There was a lot of unrest in the diverse Austrian Empire. Many opportunists from inside and outside saw Austria's weakness.

Austrian Empire conquered so much that they ended up with more non-Austrians in 'Austrian Empire'. That empire was everything but not austrian by population that's for sure. And then assassination happen and they declare war on some other foreign sovereign country. There's logic much as in China declaring war on Egypt when Taiwan attack Chinese coastal fisherman.

1. This is America, not England. We are past our Era of Propaganda. Growing up in the military, there wasn't even any propaganda on our TV's. The closest thing we got was an advertisement called "Cat Hacker Central" which had a mouse puppet and a live cat. The cat would keep trying to hack into the mouse's personal phone. Then it would end with, "Remember: Do not share confidential information over unsecured lines."

2. He proudly called himself Serbian. That's the cold hard fact.

3. Ever heard of ethnicities? Guess not, but it surprises me since you come from a region where people fight and kill each other because another person has a different ethnicity.

4. They were members of the Black Hand. Cold hard fact.

5. Nazis didn't win the war. The winners write history, and the Nazis were the losers, therefore their history lessons are not preached at all. Western history of World War II is what is preached.

6. So you agree that those Serbians aren't Austrian! Good job, we've made progress.

Napisano od Sinjid, 15.12.2015 at 18:39

3. Ever heard of ethnicities? Guess not, but it surprises me since you come from a region where people fight and kill each other because another person has a different ethnicity.

It surprise me that you say that because you come from a region where people (guests) killed entire population of native inhabitants because they were different, and the remnants deported through the trail of tears to the concentration camps.. i mean reservations.

Napisano od Sinjid, 15.12.2015 at 18:39

6. So you agree that those Serbians aren't Austrian! Good job, we've made progress.

Atleast i succeeded in the task opening your eyes that Serbs don't live only in modern-borders of Serbia and that Austrian Empire was made of many nationalities who hated the emperor and occupation forces.

Napisano od Skanderbeg, 16.12.2015 at 14:06

Napisano od Sinjid, 15.12.2015 at 18:39

3. Ever heard of ethnicities? Guess not, but it surprises me since you come from a region where people fight and kill each other because another person has a different ethnicity.

It surprise me that you say that because you come from a region where people (guests) killed entire population of native inhabitants because they were different, and the remnants deported through the trail of tears to the concentration camps.. i mean reservations.

Napisano od Sinjid, 15.12.2015 at 18:39

6. So you agree that those Serbians aren't Austrian! Good job, we've made progress.

Atleast i succeeded in the task opening your eyes that Serbs don't live only in modern-borders of Serbia and that Austrian Empire was made of many nationalities who hated the emperor and occupation forces.

1. Again, you're talking to someone who is directly descended from a Cherokee chief. Do you even know who the Cherokee are? They were the main victims of the Trail of Tears. The other groups didn't suffer like the Cherokee.
Also, that was under the hardcore democratic president Andrew Jackson, who loved hunting the Native Americans -- he was not a good man. Democracy is tyranny.

2. That you did nothing toward, and was information that I, in fact, took the initiative to provide.