What type of governance do atwar players like ?

Please dont go haywire here with arguments pro and counter, i just want to know how atwar players think.

This is off-topic...

I don't like any of these..

Napisano od Rayder4Life, 14.08.2015 at 09:39

Please dont go haywire here with arguments pro and counter, i just want to know how atwar players think.

There needs to be 'self-governance' for those who don't want to make others responsible for their own decisions.

I have to point out that Communism is compatible with Democracy and Dictatorship with Capitalism (you didnt add it).

Also, Communism/Socialism is economic ideology, not political, like Capitalism, while Democracy is about politics, its not same category.

Can i ask you to explain Authoritarianism and Despotism? I dont understand that part.

As i learned from history, Despot is person who rule some region(regional title) in the name of Monarch, Despot is title bigger than Lord(usually local title) but smaller than Prince. Title of Despot are used in Byzantine Empire and kingdoms in its zone of influence like Bulgaria and Serbia. But that 'despotism' doesnt fit in your category i believe.

Napisano od Skanderbeg, 14.08.2015 at 11:31

I have to point out that Communism is compatible with Democracy and Dictatorship with Capitalism (you didnt add it).

Also, Communism/Socialism is economic ideology, not political, like Capitalism, while Democracy is about politics, its not same category.

When you say "compatible", are you saying those are the only choices? ie. Capitalism only works with dictatorship, etc.

As for Communism, I was always under the impression that it ws both an economic AND political ideology ("true" communism is obviously economic ideology but also wants to have no government as all people are equal). Socialism I agree is more economical, but I can see how it can be construed as political in nature.

>No National Socialism
get the fuck out of here lefty

Napisano od Tundy, 14.08.2015 at 12:46

>No National Socialism
get the fuck out of here lefty

Authoritarian fits into national socialism

Napisano od brianwl, 14.08.2015 at 11:19

Napisano od Rayder4Life, 14.08.2015 at 09:39

Please dont go haywire here with arguments pro and counter, i just want to know how atwar players think.

There needs to be 'self-governance' for those who don't want to make others responsible for their own decisions.

Yeah well, that thing never existed, maybe when it will be i will add it lol

Napisano od Skanderbeg, 14.08.2015 at 11:31

Can i ask you to explain Authoritarianism and Despotism? I dont understand that part.

Authoritarian - favoring or enforcing strict obedience to authority, especially that of the government, at the expense of personal freedom.
Despotism (is like an absolute form of ruling above monarchy) - the exercise of absolute power, especially in a cruel and oppressive way.
- a country or political system where the ruler holds absolute power.

Napisano od Rayder4Life, 14.08.2015 at 12:49

...

Sure it does - article 1 of the UN charter says we are all born free (i.e. self-governance). But then i guess UN must exist for it to apply.

Napisano od brianwl, 14.08.2015 at 13:15

Sure it does - article 1 of the UN charter says we are all born free

no it doesnt

its actually in the declaration of human rights... not charter

Napisano od Goblin, 14.08.2015 at 13:26

Napisano od brianwl, 14.08.2015 at 13:15

Sure it does - article 1 of the UN charter says we are all born free

no it doesnt

its actually in the declaration of human rights... not charter

Thanks for the correction, where the hell did i get charter?

Napisano od brianwl, 14.08.2015 at 14:24

Thanks for the correction, where the hell did i get charter?

Well there is a charter... but its about goals of United nations.

still no notification when you quote me

Napisano od Pheonixking929, 14.08.2015 at 12:40

When you say "compatible", are you saying those are the only choices? ie. Capitalism only works with dictatorship, etc.

As for Communism, I was always under the impression that it ws both an economic AND political ideology ("true" communism is obviously economic ideology but also wants to have no government as all people are equal). Socialism I agree is more economical, but I can see how it can be construed as political in nature.

No, i say its one of options/choices. Communism doesnt have to be totalitarian and Capitalism doesnt have to be Democratic. There were many Capitalist yet Dictatorship countries especially in Latin America during Cold War. In Europe, you had Portugal and Greece.

Czechoslovakia had more freedom than USSR, Yugoslavia had one party but politics didnt interfere in economy and companies had freedom to decide with whom to do business, where to sell and buy, whom to employ or sack. Yugoslavias farms were privatized while USSR farms were nationalized like companies, and only political committee could decide how would those farms and companies work, where to sell, where and how to buy etc. China have 2 parties, and USSR had 1 party but it had elections.

Marx wanted Communism to kill politics and leaders and let people focus only on economy, but Lenin created 'vanguard' party to lead people through stages from capitalism/monarchy/dictatorship to Communism. But ended up with total party power. Nazism same had totalitarian party, but that is not strange since Nazism is one variant of Communism/Socialism.

Napisano od Rayder4Life, 14.08.2015 at 12:52

Authoritarian - favoring or enforcing strict obedience to authority, especially that of the government, at the expense of personal freedom.
Despotism (is like an absolute form of ruling above monarchy) - the exercise of absolute power, especially in a cruel and oppressive way.
- a country or political system where the ruler holds absolute power.

So Despotism is another word for Dictatorship? That mean he added one of these terms redundantly?

Napisano od Rayder4Life, 14.08.2015 at 12:48

Authoritarian fits into national socialism

I think more into Totalitarianism, since National Socialism wants to enter every sphere of life. social, political, economical, and dictate.

Napisano od Goblin, 14.08.2015 at 14:44

Napisano od brianwl, 14.08.2015 at 14:24

Thanks for the correction, where the hell did i get charter?

Well there is a charter... but its about goals of United nations.

still no notification when you quote me

So strange... i get notified.

I think you forgot Nazism for the weirdos in the world...