Anarchy made simple for idiots

It's a good thing you made it simple for idiots because only idiots would believe anarchy can work

I like Ron Paul, few of many politicians who disagree with US government hostile attitude towards Russian Federation.

Did he candidate for presidency? I would like him to win, see how US-Russia relations would go during his leadership.

Napisano od Skanderbeg, 10.07.2015 at 14:17

I like Ron Paul, few of many politicians who disagree with US government hostile attitude towards Russian Federation.

Did he candidate for presidency? I would like him to win, see how US-Russia relations would go during his leadership.

He's run for president the last few elections but doesn't get enough media attention to get anywhere because hes a third party candidate, he probably won't run this time since his son is running

Napisano od Viruslegion, 10.07.2015 at 19:45

Napisano od Skanderbeg, 10.07.2015 at 14:17

I like Ron Paul, few of many politicians who disagree with US government hostile attitude towards Russian Federation.

Did he candidate for presidency? I would like him to win, see how US-Russia relations would go during his leadership.

He's run for president the last few elections but doesn't get enough media attention to get anywhere because hes a third party candidate, he probably won't run this time since his son is running

Rand Paul 2016
Checkmate

Napisano od Tundy, 10.07.2015 at 21:08

Napisano od Viruslegion, 10.07.2015 at 19:45

Napisano od Skanderbeg, 10.07.2015 at 14:17

I like Ron Paul, few of many politicians who disagree with US government hostile attitude towards Russian Federation.

Did he candidate for presidency? I would like him to win, see how US-Russia relations would go during his leadership.

He's run for president the last few elections but doesn't get enough media attention to get anywhere because hes a third party candidate, he probably won't run this time since his son is running

Rand Paul 2016
Checkmate

Paul/Cruz 2016

If Ron Paul ever won the election I would seriously be worried for his safety. But don't worry. Your average, idiotic, american majority will vote for this. But hey. THey are the majority so THEY MUST BE RIGHT

Napisano od Unleashed, 11.07.2015 at 02:49

If Ron Paul ever won the election I would seriously be worried for his safety. But don't worry. Your average, idiotic, american majority will vote for this. But hey. THey are the majority so THEY MUST BE RIGHT

First, that image is making an ad hominem argument.

Second, stop generalizing please?

And since when does democracy make the argument that the majority must be right? Why do you think the US has a constitution?

Because the majority isn't always right...

Napisano od International, 11.07.2015 at 03:28

Napisano od Unleashed, 11.07.2015 at 02:49

If Ron Paul ever won the election I would seriously be worried for his safety. But don't worry. Your average, idiotic, american majority will vote for this. But hey. THey are the majority so THEY MUST BE RIGHT

First, that image is making an ad hominem argument.

Second, stop generalizing please?

And since when does democracy make the argument that the majority must be right? Why do you think the US has a constitution?

Because the majority isn't always right...

More like, is never right.

Napisano od Unleashed, 13.07.2015 at 00:59

More like, is never right.

The assumption upon which democratic republicanism is based on is that the majority is more correct than any arbitrarily defined group of people.

Napisano od Unleashed, 11.07.2015 at 02:49

If Ron Paul ever won the election I would seriously be worried for his safety. But don't worry. Your average, idiotic, american majority will vote for this. But hey. THey are the majority so THEY MUST BE RIGHT

How is that statement incorrect? Every society in history has believed this. Even you believe it to some extent. Should someone be able to piss blood on a public street? Should an Ebola infected person be able to intentionally wipe their blood, urine and feces on places? Should you be able to murder or steal?

"That wouldn't happen"

Why not? Theft and murder are a common occurrence throughout human history. Why would that suddenly stop without a government?

Hitler actually believed those words and acted them out. Re armed the people by DE REGULATING gun control. Forced companies to raise standards of work. Hilary is the opposite, she would take away your arms and lower standards for profit.

The TPP will strip all states and nations of their power to govern. Your world without states will become a reality and a nightmare as trans national globalists rule unchallenged. None of those pesky states will get in the way anymore.

Napisano od Tik-Tok, 13.07.2015 at 10:34

The TPP will strip all states and nations of their power to govern. Your world without states will become a reality and a nightmare as trans national globalists rule unchallenged. None of those pesky states will get in the way anymore.

How is that bad, states only start wars. While in the other hand, war is bad for business and thus corporations wont fight. You cant make profit while waging war unless you sell weapon, which is not expensive and special anymore so you cant make much profit out of it.

Globalism is good, it open borders thus creating free movement, free economy and standardisation of laws. Of course none should be forced to join Planetary Federation, they can stay isolated like Israel, but then they will have to pay customs prices and get visas to travel.

I disagree with Jedi on that count.

If there is only one government - where lies collective security?

Furthermore, governments are, essentially, collections of people who rule over other collections of people. Right now, if a world government forms, both groups of people will be seething against what they sensibly see as foreign rule.