To the retards who buffed ra

Go fuck yourself you don't know how to play the fucking game

good job giving 3 buffs to one of the most potentially cancerous strats on the game

someone tell me why you would give a +1 def bonus against infantry for tanks?
someone tell me why anyone would give +3 atk to bombers

all ra needed was militia range you fucking retards
everyone just wanted the god damn militia range not a cancerous buff to tanks so that you have a 90 cost 8/5 cancer unit.

can someone who made this choice please explain to me why you would make these god awful changes.
and please don't tell me a west plzing turd sandwich made these changes that destroy the whole ukr meta

how many times do people have to tell you that bringing an offensive meta kills all notion of skill on this game
did you retards learn nothing from ds?

I SAID DS WAS OP 4 YEARS AGO AND IT TOOK 2 YEARS FOR YOU MORONS TO REALIZE IT WAS OP

SO SNIP THIS RETARD DRAG AND DROP STRAT IN BUD AND REMOVE THESE RETARD BUFFS

RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Napisano od boywind2, 17.05.2020 at 02:19

how many times do people have to tell you that bringing an offensive meta kills all notion of skill on this game

Finally u say something smart

Napisano od Froyer, 17.05.2020 at 02:37

Napisano od boywind2, 17.05.2020 at 02:19

how many times do people have to tell you that bringing an offensive meta kills all notion of skill on this game

Finally u say something smart

u are one the retards who said ok to these changes ding dong

I feel bad now

Napisano od boywind2, 17.05.2020 at 02:42

Napisano od Froyer, 17.05.2020 at 02:37

Napisano od boywind2, 17.05.2020 at 02:19

how many times do people have to tell you that bringing an offensive meta kills all notion of skill on this game

Finally u say something smart

u are one the retards who said ok to these changes ding dong

Yes I am one of the guy that said ok to these changes, but I only most 2 times agaisnt ra Ukraine since his buff, and he didn't even needed the tank buff or used bombers to rape me so hard, he just outplayed me with skills, skills something that u don't have, stay retarded and make crythread so u stay the noob that u are bro.

Napisano od Froyer, 17.05.2020 at 03:12

Napisano od boywind2, 17.05.2020 at 02:42

Napisano od Froyer, 17.05.2020 at 02:37

Napisano od boywind2, 17.05.2020 at 02:19

how many times do people have to tell you that bringing an offensive meta kills all notion of skill on this game

Finally u say something smart

u are one the retards who said ok to these changes ding dong

Yes I am one of the guy that said ok to these changes, but I only most 2 times agaisnt ra Ukraine since his buff, and he didn't even needed the tank buff or used bombers to rape me so hard, he just outplayed me with skills, skills something that u don't have, stay retarded and make crythread so u stay the noob that u are bro.

says the guy who dodges me when i ask for 10 ukr vs turk duels
call me when you don't have your tail behind legs

RA is still weak and just not viable tbh, stop complaining, and if you have a problem with any strategy changes contact eagle, he leads that department, no need to make it a big deal like that

4 BUFFS NOT 3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

milita range buff
infantry range buff
+1 vs infs for tanks
9att bombers....

its unheard of, what most people agreed was a simple milita range buff, inf buff is also OK. the 2 others need to go, tanks roll better in defense then the infantry due to the +1...

Call me a retard huh

Gonna regret that brO


PS.

The RA update is something all previous people who have done strat updates do. You need to first release it and get a test run in. As said before it's being worked on and nothing was permanent.

If the bombers are buffed, then the helicopters should get buffs too, + 3 attack and + 3 range

Napisano od Lion Sin Escanor, 17.05.2020 at 03:03

I feel bad now

now i know why ur tanks and bombers were so strong xD

Napisano od Alois, 17.05.2020 at 09:19

Call me a retard huh

Gonna regret that brO


PS.

The RA update is something all previous people who have done strat updates do. You need to first release it and get a test run in. As said before it's being worked on and nothing was permanent.

ARE U RETARDED STOOPID OR DUMB !

Napisano od sirivann, 17.05.2020 at 13:56

Napisano od Alois, 17.05.2020 at 09:19

Call me a retard huh

Gonna regret that brO


PS.

The RA update is something all previous people who have done strat updates do. You need to first release it and get a test run in. As said before it's being worked on and nothing was permanent.

ARE U RETARDED STOOPID OR DUMB !

All I guess

Napisano od sirivann, 17.05.2020 at 13:56

Napisano od Alois, 17.05.2020 at 09:19

Call me a retard huh

Gonna regret that brO


PS.

The RA update is something all previous people who have done strat updates do. You need to first release it and get a test run in. As said before it's being worked on and nothing was permanent.

ARE U RETARDED STOOPID OR DUMB !

None of the above, alois is a "cartographer"

Napisano od Witch-Doctor, 17.05.2020 at 14:58

Napisano od sirivann, 17.05.2020 at 13:56

Napisano od Alois, 17.05.2020 at 09:19

Call me a retard huh

Gonna regret that brO


PS.

The RA update is something all previous people who have done strat updates do. You need to first release it and get a test run in. As said before it's being worked on and nothing was permanent.

ARE U RETARDED STOOPID OR DUMB !

None of the above, alois is a "cartographer"

This

Everyone should play RA more often and see how it goes, give some time before raging about it. People spent hours of discussion figuring out these changes, that shouldn't go unnoticed. But as I said behind the scenes: it's way more easy to buff a weak strategy than nerf an OP strat.

If RA is really broken (like it already seems to be), Implementors will have even more trouble to fix it than they had to buff it.

Napisano od sirivann, 17.05.2020 at 13:54

Napisano od Lion Sin Escanor, 17.05.2020 at 03:03

I feel bad now

now i know why ur tanks and bombers were so strong xD

i was blitz against u xd

Napisano od Estus, 17.05.2020 at 17:00

Everyone should play RA more often and see how it goes, give some time before raging about it. People spent hours of discussion figuring out these changes, that shouldn't go unnoticed. But as I said behind the scenes: it's way more easy to buff a weak strategy than nerf an OP strat.

If RA is really broken (like it already seems to be), Implementors will have even more trouble to fix it than they had to buff it.

why would it be hard removing some of the recently added buffs lol

Napisano od Witch-Doctor, 17.05.2020 at 14:58

Napisano od sirivann, 17.05.2020 at 13:56

Napisano od Alois, 17.05.2020 at 09:19

Call me a retard huh

Gonna regret that brO


PS.

The RA update is something all previous people who have done strat updates do. You need to first release it and get a test run in. As said before it's being worked on and nothing was permanent.

ARE U RETARDED STOOPID OR DUMB !

None of the above, alois is a "cartographer"

YES, PREACH! ALOIS IS A "CARTOGRAPHER"!!!!

Why dont you just buff tank attack with RA, and not the plane one there is already a strategy for planes lmao, also stop making every strategy buff militia in some way or another its getting tiresome.

Napisano od boywind2, 17.05.2020 at 18:56

Napisano od Estus, 17.05.2020 at 17:00

Everyone should play RA more often and see how it goes, give some time before raging about it. People spent hours of discussion figuring out these changes, that shouldn't go unnoticed. But as I said behind the scenes: it's way more easy to buff a weak strategy than nerf an OP strat.

If RA is really broken (like it already seems to be), Implementors will have even more trouble to fix it than they had to buff it.

why would it be hard removing some of the recently added buffs lol

Imagine an OP strategy (and everyone knows it is OP) beign overplayed, basically ruining every game. How would you, as a Implementor, find the right thing that must be changed? You need to intentionally keep the game broken in order to get more feedbacks and let people play it at will with a huge advantage over the others. If you just nerf right away, players will stop playing it and you will find yourself unable to gather data. If you start giving it small nerfs one after another, then you will have a ton of work to do (that could be avoided) in order to fix the issue.

Now imagine releasing a small buff for RA, people will start playing it of curiosity and you can analyze all feedback. If it still seems weak, you can release another small buff and see how it goes. If the latest release made the strategy OP, then erase it and stick with the first buffs. You should'nt just add tons of things and expect it to work fine.

With that said, I must ask again to you and the others: be more understanding and patient. It ain't simple.

Napisano od Estus, 18.05.2020 at 00:34

Napisano od boywind2, 17.05.2020 at 18:56

Napisano od Estus, 17.05.2020 at 17:00

Everyone should play RA more often and see how it goes, give some time before raging about it. People spent hours of discussion figuring out these changes, that shouldn't go unnoticed. But as I said behind the scenes: it's way more easy to buff a weak strategy than nerf an OP strat.

If RA is really broken (like it already seems to be), Implementors will have even more trouble to fix it than they had to buff it.

why would it be hard removing some of the recently added buffs lol

Imagine an OP strategy (and everyone knows it is OP) beign overplayed, basically ruining every game. How would you, as a Implementor, find the right thing that must be changed? You need to intentionally keep the game broken in order to get more feedbacks and let people play it at will with a huge advantage over the others. If you just nerf right away, players will stop playing it and you will find yourself unable to gather data. If you start giving it small nerfs one after another, then you will have a ton of work to do (that could be avoided) in order to fix the issue.

Now imagine releasing a small buff for RA, people will start playing it of curiosity and you can analyze all feedback. If it still seems weak, you can release another small buff and see how it goes. If the latest release made the strategy OP, then erase it and stick with the first buffs. You should'nt just add tons of things and expect it to work fine.

With that said, I must ask again to you and the others: be more understanding and patient. It ain't simple.

it is simple you brainlet just remove the tank defense bomber attack

Napisano od boywind2, 18.05.2020 at 00:53

Napisano od Estus, 18.05.2020 at 00:34

Napisano od boywind2, 17.05.2020 at 18:56

Napisano od Estus, 17.05.2020 at 17:00

Everyone should play RA more often and see how it goes, give some time before raging about it. People spent hours of discussion figuring out these changes, that shouldn't go unnoticed. But as I said behind the scenes: it's way more easy to buff a weak strategy than nerf an OP strat.

If RA is really broken (like it already seems to be), Implementors will have even more trouble to fix it than they had to buff it.

why would it be hard removing some of the recently added buffs lol

Imagine an OP strategy (and everyone knows it is OP) beign overplayed, basically ruining every game. How would you, as a Implementor, find the right thing that must be changed? You need to intentionally keep the game broken in order to get more feedbacks and let people play it at will with a huge advantage over the others. If you just nerf right away, players will stop playing it and you will find yourself unable to gather data. If you start giving it small nerfs one after another, then you will have a ton of work to do (that could be avoided) in order to fix the issue.

Now imagine releasing a small buff for RA, people will start playing it of curiosity and you can analyze all feedback. If it still seems weak, you can release another small buff and see how it goes. If the latest release made the strategy OP, then erase it and stick with the first buffs. You should'nt just add tons of things and expect it to work fine.

With that said, I must ask again to you and the others: be more understanding and patient. It ain't simple.

it is simple you brainlet just remove the tank defense bomber attack

no, keep bomber attack and remove militia range and tank +1 defense, will fix over expending problem and make RA really RA not mini blitz with op tank def

Napisano od SyrianDevil, 18.05.2020 at 21:55

Napisano od boywind2, 18.05.2020 at 00:53

Napisano od Estus, 18.05.2020 at 00:34

Napisano od boywind2, 17.05.2020 at 18:56

Napisano od Estus, 17.05.2020 at 17:00

Everyone should play RA more often and see how it goes, give some time before raging about it. People spent hours of discussion figuring out these changes, that shouldn't go unnoticed. But as I said behind the scenes: it's way more easy to buff a weak strategy than nerf an OP strat.

If RA is really broken (like it already seems to be), Implementors will have even more trouble to fix it than they had to buff it.

why would it be hard removing some of the recently added buffs lol

Imagine an OP strategy (and everyone knows it is OP) beign overplayed, basically ruining every game. How would you, as a Implementor, find the right thing that must be changed? You need to intentionally keep the game broken in order to get more feedbacks and let people play it at will with a huge advantage over the others. If you just nerf right away, players will stop playing it and you will find yourself unable to gather data. If you start giving it small nerfs one after another, then you will have a ton of work to do (that could be avoided) in order to fix the issue.

Now imagine releasing a small buff for RA, people will start playing it of curiosity and you can analyze all feedback. If it still seems weak, you can release another small buff and see how it goes. If the latest release made the strategy OP, then erase it and stick with the first buffs. You should'nt just add tons of things and expect it to work fine.

With that said, I must ask again to you and the others: be more understanding and patient. It ain't simple.

it is simple you brainlet just remove the tank defense bomber attack

no, keep bomber attack and remove militia range and tank +1 defense, will fix over expending problem and make RA really RA not mini blitz with op tank def

no bomber attack is cancer