|
Didn't read the comments but custom strategies for custom maps would be 6/5.
As an immediate solution though, the fix is in our hands as a community. Pay more attention to the map making forum, even if you don't make maps. Leave a comment for a map if you like it, etc. More map making contests (cough competitive map contest meester cough) would be great, and perhaps PC rewards for making maps, reaching milestone plays etc
----
We are not the same - I am a Martian.
We are not the same - I am a... divided constellation?
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
But who doesnt want to be reminded of the UN cancer? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Joking aside, I think this is a good idea.
Omg your Portuguese too <3
LOL, I thought we established that when we played yesterday.
Didn't pay attention to the chat
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
Napisano od artsinis, 08.02.2016 at 21:50
Just stop with the Rome and WWII fetish, don't fall in RP-UN-bore-traps and all be fine.
And I'm reforming RP to decancerise it, does it count? ;(
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
Citat:
As an immediate solution though, the fix is in our hands as a community. Pay more attention to the map making forum, even if you don't make maps. Leave a comment for a map if you like it, etc. More map making contests (cough competitive map contest meester cough) would be great, and perhaps PC rewards for making maps, reaching milestone plays etc
Plus getting more map reviews, systematic use of "map feature" tool, better utilization of SP multiplier (not only to reduce SP reward, but also to enhance SP reward for specific map/scenario)....
----
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
I don't have time to do anything more complicated at the moment, but for now I've changed default order ("Featured") to rating, with 50 plays minimum. That should make things a bit more dynamic.
Later I hope to implement some kind of "Hot" sorting, as been suggested in this thread.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
Sounds good for now. If you guys have any map worthy of feature aside from the standard World War/competitive custom map do send a mod a PM.
----
We are not the same - I am a Martian.
We are not the same - I am a... divided constellation?
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
Finish the map editor and I'll pump out a map an month this year.
----
We are not the same- I am a Martian.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
Napisano od Helly, 10.02.2016 at 04:36
Finish the map editor and I'll pump out a map an month this year.
Me too i hope the feature to increase map size would be implemented.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
I am going to actualize this data again soon and use it as evidence that the custom map market is flawed, If you have any suggestion/question/idea regarding this data you should raise your concern now.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
Well for me , i like colonial age maps, like ggg worlds, but u need much time to play that, plus its hard to find 20 ppl, so ppl play mostly smaller maps with few players, or maps that boost sp
----
It's scary how many possible genocidal war lords play this game, and i could be one of them
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
Support. Let's make it happen.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
Napisano od Tundy, 12.05.2016 at 20:39
I am going to actualize this data again soon and use it as evidence that the custom map market is flawed, If you have any suggestion/question/idea regarding this data you should raise your concern now.
I can find two crippling issues with your statistical analysis in about one minute of thinking.
1. It is not possible to justify that new maps tend to have less plays than older maps simply by showing that a higher proportion of top-played maps are old. You have tried to show that top-played maps tend to be old maps, and not that old maps tend to be top-played maps. Those are not the same thing.
2. If you are attempting to disprove a null hypothesis, then you should do an analysis on the sampling distribution assuming the null hypothesis and find a p-value, as it is possible that older maps are played more than newer maps due to sheer chance, and not because the age of the map has an impact on the number of plays.
Also, an issue that has nothing to do with your statistical analysis, but does have much to do with the conclusion you're drawing:
3. In order to demonstrate that new maps are played less often than old maps, you need to show that the rate of change over time in the number of plays is higher for old maps, not just simply demonstrate that the number of plays is higher for old maps. Thus, even if your null hypothesis is disproven, that does not necessarily mean that newer maps are played less often. Even if newer maps are played much more often, they will still have less plays than old maps, simply because they haven't had time to accumulate plays.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
Only map that is made in 2015-16 is RP,thats why this all is happening.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
Support
----
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
Napisano od Oleg, 16.05.2016 at 05:12
Only map that is made in 2015-16 is RP,thats why this all is happening.
Hi
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
Napisano od Oleg, 16.05.2016 at 05:12
Only map that is made in 2015-16 is RP,thats why this all is happening.
Hi
not your map xd
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
Napisano od Oleg, 17.05.2016 at 04:16
Napisano od Oleg, 16.05.2016 at 05:12
Only map that is made in 2015-16 is RP,thats why this all is happening.
Hi
not your map xd
I still influence the current map xd
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|