|
Napisano od Desu, 08.09.2014 at 15:17
Napisano od Tundy, 08.09.2014 at 10:27
This is a bad idea, because a clan with 1 win and 24 defeats, will beat a coalition that has only played 24 games even if they win all of them.
you need the full 25 CWs to be ranked
i think your summary is wrong then
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
Napisano od Tundy, 08.09.2014 at 17:20
Napisano od Desu, 08.09.2014 at 15:17
Napisano od Tundy, 08.09.2014 at 10:27
This is a bad idea, because a clan with 1 win and 24 defeats, will beat a coalition that has only played 24 games even if they win all of them.
you need the full 25 CWs to be ranked
i think your summary is wrong then
Why you're so negative, every CW system that have been proposed lately including this one in my opinion are better than the one we actually have
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
Napisano od Tundy, 08.09.2014 at 10:27
This is a bad idea, because a clan with 1 win and 24 defeats, will beat a coalition that has only played 24 games even if they win all of them.
Nice reading and math skills
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
Support this idea
BUMP
----
It's not the end.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
Stryko Račun izbrisan |
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
Bump + upvoted
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|
|
Napisano od Desu, 27.08.2013 at 16:03
Summary and Final Solution
- Season limit changed from 10 maximum, to 25 coalition wars minimum
- To create a good sample, you need the full 25 CWs to be ranked
- You can still have more coalition wars to increase ranking/percentage after the 25 are done
- Win percentage out of total games per season used as marker, not competence.
You have a full 4 days, I can only hope changes are made.
[All info is at the time of posting, 27.8.2013]
This
----
intelligence + imagination = extraordinary result
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
|