Who want more upgrade (rank 9+)

I want t0 know for all the rank 9+ player think about getting new upgrade

I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need

+1 to Main Attack

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 18.09.2014 at 22:35

I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need

who cares about low rank they should be put back to begginer room, we need more upgrade that what makes most strategy game fun. improvement upon improvement

Napisano od Htin, 24.09.2014 at 19:47

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 18.09.2014 at 22:35

I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need

who cares about low rank they should be put back to begginer room, we need more upgrade that what makes most strategy game fun. improvement upon improvement

That's the thing, if it's truly a strategy game then the only benefit one should get from playing for a long time is experience and a better sense for the game. But the more upgrades you add, the harder it is for a rank 5 or 6 with no premium to beat a rank 10 or 11 with premium, as there's not a whole lot of strategy involved in having faster units, luckier, cheaper, etc.

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 24.09.2014 at 20:31

Napisano od Htin, 24.09.2014 at 19:47

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 18.09.2014 at 22:35

I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need

who cares about low rank they should be put back to begginer room, we need more upgrade that what makes most strategy game fun. improvement upon improvement

That's the thing, if it's truly a strategy game then the only benefit one should get from playing for a long time is experience and a better sense for the game. But the more upgrades you add, the harder it is for a rank 5 or 6 with no premium to beat a rank 10 or 11 with premium, as there's not a whole lot of strategy involved in having faster units, luckier, cheaper, etc.

technology plus why would a low rank play with a high rank if he r she know she will lose and rank doesn't matter

Napisano od Htin, 24.09.2014 at 20:51

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 24.09.2014 at 20:31

Napisano od Htin, 24.09.2014 at 19:47

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 18.09.2014 at 22:35

I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need

who cares about low rank they should be put back to begginer room, we need more upgrade that what makes most strategy game fun. improvement upon improvement

That's the thing, if it's truly a strategy game then the only benefit one should get from playing for a long time is experience and a better sense for the game. But the more upgrades you add, the harder it is for a rank 5 or 6 with no premium to beat a rank 10 or 11 with premium, as there's not a whole lot of strategy involved in having faster units, luckier, cheaper, etc.

technology plus why would a low rank play with a high rank if he r she know she will lose and rank doesn't matter

Low ranks play with high ranks often enough, not so much in 3v3, but even there we see r8 vs r10 or 11, but more in world games or ancients. Why shouldn't we play with lower ranked players? The more upgrades have an affect on the game, the more lower ranks will play high sp games like rp to get to a higher rank for them upgrades.

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 24.09.2014 at 21:01

Napisano od Htin, 24.09.2014 at 20:51

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 24.09.2014 at 20:31

Napisano od Htin, 24.09.2014 at 19:47

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 18.09.2014 at 22:35

I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need

who cares about low rank they should be put back to begginer room, we need more upgrade that what makes most strategy game fun. improvement upon improvement

That's the thing, if it's truly a strategy game then the only benefit one should get from playing for a long time is experience and a better sense for the game. But the more upgrades you add, the harder it is for a rank 5 or 6 with no premium to beat a rank 10 or 11 with premium, as there's not a whole lot of strategy involved in having faster units, luckier, cheaper, etc.

technology plus why would a low rank play with a high rank if he r she know she will lose and rank doesn't matter

Low ranks play with high ranks often enough, not so much in 3v3, but even there we see r8 vs r10 or 11, but more in world games or ancients. Why shouldn't we play with lower ranked players? The more upgrades have an affect on the game, the more lower ranks will play high sp games like rp to get to a higher rank for them upgrades.

once you get all upgrade , aw becomes boring and repetitive. plus low rank are rp, this isn't good for player of higher rank since it took a long time to earn their sp. With rp it takes you 4 month to get all upgrade, whereas a non-rp player it takes about 2 year to get all upgrade

Napisano od Htin, 24.09.2014 at 22:04

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 24.09.2014 at 21:01

Napisano od Htin, 24.09.2014 at 20:51

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 24.09.2014 at 20:31

Napisano od Htin, 24.09.2014 at 19:47

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 18.09.2014 at 22:35

I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need

who cares about low rank they should be put back to begginer room, we need more upgrade that what makes most strategy game fun. improvement upon improvement

That's the thing, if it's truly a strategy game then the only benefit one should get from playing for a long time is experience and a better sense for the game. But the more upgrades you add, the harder it is for a rank 5 or 6 with no premium to beat a rank 10 or 11 with premium, as there's not a whole lot of strategy involved in having faster units, luckier, cheaper, etc.

technology plus why would a low rank play with a high rank if he r she know she will lose and rank doesn't matter

Low ranks play with high ranks often enough, not so much in 3v3, but even there we see r8 vs r10 or 11, but more in world games or ancients. Why shouldn't we play with lower ranked players? The more upgrades have an affect on the game, the more lower ranks will play high sp games like rp to get to a higher rank for them upgrades.

once you get all upgrade , aw becomes boring and repetitive. plus low rank are rp, this isn't good for player of higher rank since it took a long time to earn their sp. With rp it takes you 4 month to get all upgrade, whereas a non-rp player it takes about 2 year to get all upgrade

I agree it must become more repetitive after rank 10, and the rp problem is exactly as you said it. Would they rather take time to learn skills in like 1-2 year, or rp for a few months and get all those upgrades which will give them an advantage over most of the community that isn't r10 +?

-10 inf cost +1 range, its just too op. No more upgrades necessary. If I could I would play without upgrades every game but then people would complain.

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 18.09.2014 at 22:35

I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need

i agree with this... however... it would be nice to have something to upgrade... maybe a weak optional unit that can only be given to lower ranks in game. Just to mix it up a bit.

I don't think high ranks need any more upgrades.

We could, however, have some options to spend our SP. That could be done with custom flags, icons, images and colors, for example.

Napisano od Pinheiro, 26.09.2014 at 07:29

I don't think high ranks need any more upgrades.

We could, however, have some options to spend our SP. That could be done with custom flags, icons, images and colors, for example.

Napisano od Pinheiro, 26.09.2014 at 07:29

I don't think high ranks need any more upgrades.

We could, however, have some options to spend our SP. That could be done with custom flags, icons, images and colors, for example.

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 24.09.2014 at 22:08

Napisano od Htin, 24.09.2014 at 22:04

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 24.09.2014 at 21:01

Napisano od Htin, 24.09.2014 at 20:51

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 24.09.2014 at 20:31

Napisano od Htin, 24.09.2014 at 19:47

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 18.09.2014 at 22:35

I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need

who cares about low rank they should be put back to begginer room, we need more upgrade that what makes most strategy game fun. improvement upon improvement

That's the thing, if it's truly a strategy game then the only benefit one should get from playing for a long time is experience and a better sense for the game. But the more upgrades you add, the harder it is for a rank 5 or 6 with no premium to beat a rank 10 or 11 with premium, as there's not a whole lot of strategy involved in having faster units, luckier, cheaper, etc.

technology plus why would a low rank play with a high rank if he r she know she will lose and rank doesn't matter

Low ranks play with high ranks often enough, not so much in 3v3, but even there we see r8 vs r10 or 11, but more in world games or ancients. Why shouldn't we play with lower ranked players? The more upgrades have an affect on the game, the more lower ranks will play high sp games like rp to get to a higher rank for them upgrades.

once you get all upgrade , aw becomes boring and repetitive. plus low rank are rp, this isn't good for player of higher rank since it took a long time to earn their sp. With rp it takes you 4 month to get all upgrade, whereas a non-rp player it takes about 2 year to get all upgrade

I agree it must become more repetitive after rank 10, and the rp problem is exactly as you said it. Would they rather take time to learn skills in like 1-2 year, or rp for a few months and get all those upgrades which will give them an advantage over most of the community that isn't r10 +?

why you even whinning this the decision fr rank 9+

Napisano od Htin, 27.09.2014 at 09:43

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 24.09.2014 at 22:08

Napisano od Htin, 24.09.2014 at 22:04

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 24.09.2014 at 21:01

Napisano od Htin, 24.09.2014 at 20:51

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 24.09.2014 at 20:31

Napisano od Htin, 24.09.2014 at 19:47

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 18.09.2014 at 22:35

I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need

who cares about low rank they should be put back to begginer room, we need more upgrade that what makes most strategy game fun. improvement upon improvement

That's the thing, if it's truly a strategy game then the only benefit one should get from playing for a long time is experience and a better sense for the game. But the more upgrades you add, the harder it is for a rank 5 or 6 with no premium to beat a rank 10 or 11 with premium, as there's not a whole lot of strategy involved in having faster units, luckier, cheaper, etc.

technology plus why would a low rank play with a high rank if he r she know she will lose and rank doesn't matter

Low ranks play with high ranks often enough, not so much in 3v3, but even there we see r8 vs r10 or 11, but more in world games or ancients. Why shouldn't we play with lower ranked players? The more upgrades have an affect on the game, the more lower ranks will play high sp games like rp to get to a higher rank for them upgrades.

once you get all upgrade , aw becomes boring and repetitive. plus low rank are rp, this isn't good for player of higher rank since it took a long time to earn their sp. With rp it takes you 4 month to get all upgrade, whereas a non-rp player it takes about 2 year to get all upgrade

I agree it must become more repetitive after rank 10, and the rp problem is exactly as you said it. Would they rather take time to learn skills in like 1-2 year, or rp for a few months and get all those upgrades which will give them an advantage over most of the community that isn't r10 +?

why you even whinning this the decision fr rank 9+

ok brb playing a rp to get to r9

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 27.09.2014 at 17:26

Napisano od Htin, 27.09.2014 at 09:43

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 24.09.2014 at 22:08

Napisano od Htin, 24.09.2014 at 22:04

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 24.09.2014 at 21:01

Napisano od Htin, 24.09.2014 at 20:51

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 24.09.2014 at 20:31

Napisano od Htin, 24.09.2014 at 19:47

Napisano od OG Pepperoni, 18.09.2014 at 22:35

I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need

who cares about low rank they should be put back to begginer room, we need more upgrade that what makes most strategy game fun. improvement upon improvement

That's the thing, if it's truly a strategy game then the only benefit one should get from playing for a long time is experience and a better sense for the game. But the more upgrades you add, the harder it is for a rank 5 or 6 with no premium to beat a rank 10 or 11 with premium, as there's not a whole lot of strategy involved in having faster units, luckier, cheaper, etc.

technology plus why would a low rank play with a high rank if he r she know she will lose and rank doesn't matter

Low ranks play with high ranks often enough, not so much in 3v3, but even there we see r8 vs r10 or 11, but more in world games or ancients. Why shouldn't we play with lower ranked players? The more upgrades have an affect on the game, the more lower ranks will play high sp games like rp to get to a higher rank for them upgrades.

once you get all upgrade , aw becomes boring and repetitive. plus low rank are rp, this isn't good for player of higher rank since it took a long time to earn their sp. With rp it takes you 4 month to get all upgrade, whereas a non-rp player it takes about 2 year to get all upgrade

I agree it must become more repetitive after rank 10, and the rp problem is exactly as you said it. Would they rather take time to learn skills in like 1-2 year, or rp for a few months and get all those upgrades which will give them an advantage over most of the community that isn't r10 +?

why you even whinning this the decision fr rank 9+

ok brb playing a rp to get to r9

rp is bad

There should be upgrades because I would like to see more respect to higger ranks LeL.
That's gonna bring us more care about ranks in cw games just like in old days were every rank counts...
10,10,10 vs 10,9,7 wouldn't be same before/after this idea.

I like the idea of new upgrades, some of these are decent, but just in general more should be added

This again...


pls just suggest one extra upgrade or something not ''more upgrades'' as not only would it make the difference between ranks bigger, but it would encourage people to rather concentrate on sp rather than skill.