Gard wants to play AtWar more! Point and laugh!

Hello AtWar.

My name is Gard, and this is my thread dedicated to figuring out a way for me to enjoy playing AtWar again. Yes yes, I've been a total and utter whiny bitch ever since I set foot on this game in 2010, but hey, when have you ever seen me in-game? Exactly. I don't know why I personally never like to play, but I sincerely want to now. Will it be worth it? I'd like to also get going on the maps I've promised over the past few months (I stopped working when the Crashes and Tunderb&s started), so is anyone interested in laughing at me trying to play, and supporting my ever-increasing cartography love and skills? Or should I just, y'know, stay in Off-Topic and keep shitposting whenever possible?

To Mods: I felt this belonged in GenDisc, due to it being about AtWar, but if you feel it's more Off-Topic, I'll be more than happy to move it over there.

Time to point and laugh.

Play competitive. Everything else is for SP haha.

XAXAXAXAXAXAXA

Napisano od Guest, 18.03.2014 at 16:07

More crap

Hurry up and commit Sepukku please.

Napisano od Guest, 18.03.2014 at 16:16

Play competitive. Everything else is for SP haha.

Not true, I play world games for fun. (they still do give good sp though )

Gard, glad you've decided to start playing more. Hope to see you in game and play you a few times. Good luck with your maps too.

Napisano od TheRiddler, 18.03.2014 at 17:43

Napisano od Guest, 18.03.2014 at 16:16

Play competitive. Everything else is for SP haha.

Not true, I play world games for fun. (they still do give good sp though )

Gard, glad you've decided to start playing more. Hope to see you in game and play you a few times. Good luck with your maps too.

World games are considered competitive

Napisano od Guest, 18.03.2014 at 17:48

Napisano od TheRiddler, 18.03.2014 at 17:43

Napisano od Guest, 18.03.2014 at 16:16

Play competitive. Everything else is for SP haha.

Not true, I play world games for fun. (they still do give good sp though )

Gard, glad you've decided to start playing more. Hope to see you in game and play you a few times. Good luck with your maps too.

World games are considered competitive

Then how come nobody CWs with them?

Napisano od TheRiddler, 18.03.2014 at 17:54

Napisano od Guest, 18.03.2014 at 17:48

Napisano od TheRiddler, 18.03.2014 at 17:43

Napisano od Guest, 18.03.2014 at 16:16

Play competitive. Everything else is for SP haha.

Not true, I play world games for fun. (they still do give good sp though )

Gard, glad you've decided to start playing more. Hope to see you in game and play you a few times. Good luck with your maps too.

World games are considered competitive

Then how come nobody CWs with them?

because people are resistant to changes and new ideas

Napisano od TheRiddler, 18.03.2014 at 17:54

Napisano od Guest, 18.03.2014 at 17:48

Napisano od TheRiddler, 18.03.2014 at 17:43

Napisano od Guest, 18.03.2014 at 16:16

Play competitive. Everything else is for SP haha.

Not true, I play world games for fun. (they still do give good sp though )

Gard, glad you've decided to start playing more. Hope to see you in game and play you a few times. Good luck with your maps too.

World games are considered competitive

Then how come nobody CWs with them?

Too long..That's why.
Still competitive. Competitive is when teams or players are balanced. Both have chances to win, and players aren't unskilled.

Napisano od Cthulhu, 18.03.2014 at 17:57

Napisano od TheRiddler, 18.03.2014 at 17:54

Napisano od Guest, 18.03.2014 at 17:48

Napisano od TheRiddler, 18.03.2014 at 17:43

Napisano od Guest, 18.03.2014 at 16:16

Play competitive. Everything else is for SP haha.

Not true, I play world games for fun. (they still do give good sp though )

Gard, glad you've decided to start playing more. Hope to see you in game and play you a few times. Good luck with your maps too.

World games are considered competitive

Then how come nobody CWs with them?

because people are resistant to changes and new ideas

are you for real?

ppl dont cw on world maps because its quite hard for 4+ people to have 4 hours to spare to play a cw.

ppl however, do play eurasia cws, although they can quite often become long games too.

anyways on topic, gard lest forum posting more playing

Napisano od Guest, 18.03.2014 at 18:05

Napisano od TheRiddler, 18.03.2014 at 17:54

Napisano od Guest, 18.03.2014 at 17:48

Napisano od TheRiddler, 18.03.2014 at 17:43

Napisano od Guest, 18.03.2014 at 16:16

Play competitive. Everything else is for SP haha.

Not true, I play world games for fun. (they still do give good sp though )

Gard, glad you've decided to start playing more. Hope to see you in game and play you a few times. Good luck with your maps too.

World games are considered competitive

Then how come nobody CWs with them?

Too long..That's why.
Still competitive. Competitive is when teams or players are balanced. Both have chances to win, and players aren't unskilled.

Wrong, World game is just not balanced. there would have to be set rules such as each continent needs a balanced number of players to make it fair and even then, which ever team gets 2 of the three continents wins.

Napisano od nonames, 18.03.2014 at 18:18

Napisano od Guest, 18.03.2014 at 18:05

Napisano od TheRiddler, 18.03.2014 at 17:54

Napisano od Guest, 18.03.2014 at 17:48

Napisano od TheRiddler, 18.03.2014 at 17:43

Napisano od Guest, 18.03.2014 at 16:16

Play competitive. Everything else is for SP haha.

Not true, I play world games for fun. (they still do give good sp though )

Gard, glad you've decided to start playing more. Hope to see you in game and play you a few times. Good luck with your maps too.

World games are considered competitive

Then how come nobody CWs with them?

Too long..That's why.
Still competitive. Competitive is when teams or players are balanced. Both have chances to win, and players aren't unskilled.

Wrong, World game is just not balanced. there would have to be set rules such as each continent needs a balanced number of players to make it fair and even then, which ever team gets 2 of the three continents wins.

Nah, it's like Europe+ but bigger. Anyways, you pick where you want to pick. It's up to you where you pick.
If the map is "unbalanced" (even though it isn't), it can still be competitive.

Stay on-topic, minions. Also@those posting negatively: Why?

Napisano od Guest, 18.03.2014 at 16:16

Play competitive. Everything else is for SP haha.

really? i mean of course, The hexagon and UN games aren't good, but waht about something like WW2?
many good players play that and it's fun...

Yes i will be happy to train you gard.huehuehue

To increase your skill, I reccomend playing LoN and UN and roleplays. 3v3 is just for SP farming, mods should ban it.

Napisano od Guest, 19.03.2014 at 01:42

I reccomend playing LoN and UN and roleplays. 3v3 is just for SP farming, mods should ban it.

Napisano od Khal.eesi, 19.03.2014 at 02:16

Napisano od Guest, 19.03.2014 at 01:42

I reccomend playing LoN and UN and roleplays. 3v3 is just for SP farming, mods should ban it.

img

Someone doesn't get jokes.

HAHAHAHAHA *points*

Oh I forgot: HAHA! *points*

Napisano od Tirpitz406, 18.03.2014 at 18:56

Napisano od Guest, 18.03.2014 at 16:16

Play competitive. Everything else is for SP haha.

really? i mean of course, The hexagon and UN games aren't good, but waht about something like WW2?
many good players play that and it's fun...

People should stop the "fun" thing lol it's absurd.
WW2 is not balanced nor competitive at all. They are made by bad players, that's the only proof I can give because mostly people will make bullshit or disagree with me xD

this is pointless.

Napisano od Guest, 19.03.2014 at 08:40

People should stop the "fun" thing lol it's absurd.
WW2 is not balanced nor competitive at all. They are made by bad players, that's the only proof I can give because mostly people will make bullshit or disagree with me xD

fun is the reason why you play this, some can only have fun by winning something (you probably)
others have fun playing something different, and maybe a bit unbalanced, they don't have to win...
well, i mostly want to win, but i don't need to win, to have fun.

i don't know who you mean with 'bad players', are unleashed, tito and SQUARRED all 'bad players'? i think i once saw Aquise in an WW2 too...

and look at it this way: WW2 can be played like a world game too...

EDIT: secretly i like scenarios because they are easier to win than normal europe FFAs (2 vs 5) and 3 vs 3s with 7 rank limit

Napisano od Tirpitz406, 19.03.2014 at 08:51

Napisano od Guest, 19.03.2014 at 08:40

People should stop the "fun" thing lol it's absurd.
WW2 is not balanced nor competitive at all. They are made by bad players, that's the only proof I can give because mostly people will make bullshit or disagree with me xD

fun is the reason why you play this, some can only have fun by winning something (you probably)
others have fun playing something different, and maybe a bit unbalanced, they don't have to win...
well, i mostly want to win, but i don't need to win, to have fun.

i don't know who you mean with 'bad players', are unleashed, tito and SQUARRED all 'bad players'? i think i once saw Aquise in an WW2 too...

and look at it this way: WW2 can be played like a world game too...

Fun is when you know you have a chance to win and you know you played well. Not needed to win, that's optional. It's not fun when you go play a scenario, and stack RA tanks because you have unlimited money (Common situation for newbies xD) or unbalanced, that makes it not fun since if you win or lose, you know it was unbalanced. I doubt someone can have fun by this, it's like using cheats in a game.
And yes they are. All 3. I don't even know tito since he's not Andartes tbh, but still.

Sure WW2 can be played as a world game but not the same, unbalanced like I said and that is not the only bad thing. It's a huge game based on teams, so most of times you have people who ruin the game or a team. Coordination is also harder.

Napisano od Guest, 19.03.2014 at 09:12

Fun is when you know you have a chance to win and you know you played well. Not needed to win, that's optional. It's not fun when you go play a scenario, and stack RA tanks because you have unlimited money (Common situation for newbies xD) or unbalanced, that makes it not fun since if you win or lose, you know it was unbalanced. I doubt someone can have fun by this, it's like using cheats in a game.
And yes they are. All 3. I don't even know tito since he's not Andartes tbh, but still.

Sure WW2 can be played as a world game but not the same, unbalanced like I said and that is not the only bad thing. It's a huge game based on teams, so most of times you have people who ruin the game or a team. Coordination is also harder.

Unbalanced? i saw axis and allies winning in WW2 games.
you maybe should make an statistic showing the wins and looses of different europe+ team combinations to show that even this is balanced,
then you can make an statistic of WW2 games showing if it's unbalanced...

RA tanks spamming...well...on some maps, this really SUCKS BIG BALLS, but on others like (again ) WW2 i would not recommend tank spamming, as these games are close to world games, even WW1s and other games are hard to handle when you have about 1000 income total and tanks cost a lot

Napisano od Tirpitz406, 19.03.2014 at 09:34

Napisano od Guest, 19.03.2014 at 09:12

Fun is when you know you have a chance to win and you know you played well. Not needed to win, that's optional. It's not fun when you go play a scenario, and stack RA tanks because you have unlimited money (Common situation for newbies xD) or unbalanced, that makes it not fun since if you win or lose, you know it was unbalanced. I doubt someone can have fun by this, it's like using cheats in a game.
And yes they are. All 3. I don't even know tito since he's not Andartes tbh, but still.

Sure WW2 can be played as a world game but not the same, unbalanced like I said and that is not the only bad thing. It's a huge game based on teams, so most of times you have people who ruin the game or a team. Coordination is also harder.

Unbalanced? i saw axis and allies winning in WW2 games.
you maybe should make an statistic showing the wins and looses of different europe+ team combinations to show that even this is balanced,
then you can make an statistic of WW2 games showing if it's unbalanced...

RA tanks spamming...well...on some maps, this really SUCKS BIG BALLS, but on others like (again ) WW2 i would not recommend tank spamming, as these games are close to world games, even WW1s and other games are hard to handle when you have about 1000 income total and tanks cost a lot

There are so much WWs I don't know which one you mean, haha.
But from what I saw, germany and some other stuff are full of reinforcements, while UK and some other countries have nothing.
Also, the "walls" are just autistic. The city walls I mean. They shouldn't be put there, AW does not work like that :S
Sure every team can win like you can win with poland belarus hungary in a 3v3 lol. It's about players.
Tank spamming is absurd, yes. But most of newbies think these games like UN, WW etc are fun because they have unlimited money and it's the only way they can play.

Yes play AW more Gard, honestly play what you want and fuck the haters. : )

To the off topic posters: Im not a real fan of scenario's but you can't just go and group them ALL as being bad and for noobs, some are well done and actually fun (not talking about UN) . 3v3 isn't the perfectly balanced as you might think but I still play it because its fun and competitive. Its fun to win when chances are equal and its even more fun to win when the chances aren't in your favor, so in a way perfect balance is boring and the odds being tipped to one side's favor is sometimes more fun. You should play to have (for the millionth time i say this) fun. Start being more open minded people.

Also, *points at Gard* HAHAHHAHAHAHA.

Napisano od Guest, 19.03.2014 at 09:40

Napisano od Tirpitz406, 19.03.2014 at 09:34

Unbalanced? i saw axis and allies winning in WW2 games.
you maybe should make an statistic showing the wins and looses of different europe+ team combinations to show that even this is balanced,
then you can make an statistic of WW2 games showing if it's unbalanced...

RA tanks spamming...well...on some maps, this really SUCKS BIG BALLS, but on others like (again ) WW2 i would not recommend tank spamming, as these games are close to world games, even WW1s and other games are hard to handle when you have about 1000 income total and tanks cost a lot

There are so much WWs I don't know which one you mean, haha.
But from what I saw, germany and some other stuff are full of reinforcements, while UK and some other countries have nothing.
Also, the "walls" are just autistic. The city walls I mean. They shouldn't be put there, AW does not work like that :S
Sure every team can win like you can win with poland belarus hungary in a 3v3 lol. It's about players.
Tank spamming is absurd, yes. But most of newbies think these games like UN, WW etc are fun because they have unlimited money and it's the only way they can play.

well, i mean ultimate WWII, it's fun to play that and it's quite balanced, even though the team thing you sayed is true, i once saw a russia winning against germany but then china died, you should give it a try

well, the walls are there to save time, wich is quite good, as the first turn in scenarios is like the second turn as Ukraine...
but seriosly, i always replace these expansive inf walls with milita walls xD

btw: some scenarios are a good way of bringing noobs in the competitive range, i once played some un games too ...but then i discovered (as a rank 5 or so) the fun of WW1s and europe+, then i became a quite good rank 7 and then i stoped playing europe+'s for a while and became as "meh" skilled as i am today