Sucking up.

I noticed ALOT of people who mostly ''trolled'' in this game (still do, but not in front of mods) trying to ''ímprove AW'' as they call it.
I kinda get annoyed by all this ''fakyness'' I mean, if you have a great idea to improve, great!
But dont spam and spam and spam about it in global. If its worth looking, people will take a look at it. It shouldn't be (as you guys call it) ''advertised'' since it isn't.
And then people with like even a bigger 'history' then mine (example), get ''qualified'' for mod. And after they become mod, all of sudden they couldn't care less about improvements of AW and just mute mute mute ban ban ban people.
I think being a mod isn't about this at all...


This isn't ''attacking'' as many of you guys will call it. Or flamewar/trashtalk etc. So there is no reason to delete/lock it.
P.S. Didn't know better title. So dont come with the title is ''offensive''

Agreed

I don't suck up to mods I spam global right in front of mods!

Napisano od KYBL, 09.10.2014 at 07:24

I don't suck up to mods I spam global right in front of mods!

That sounds like clovis

Napisano od Tundy, 09.10.2014 at 07:47

That sounds like clovis

Napisano od KYBL, 09.10.2014 at 07:24

I don't suck up to mods I spam global right in front of mods!

Indeed you do. You're a royal pain in the ass! JK.

Napisano od Waffel, 09.10.2014 at 04:49

...and just mute mute mute ban ban ban people.
I think being a mod isn't about this at all...

Being Mod is about channeling efforts/contributions and hindering/mitigating negative impacts on the convivial community called atWar.

Napisano od Columna Durruti, 09.10.2014 at 08:03

Napisano od Waffel, 09.10.2014 at 04:49

...and just mute mute mute ban ban ban people.
I think being a mod isn't about this at all...

Being Mod is about channeling efforts/contributions and hindering/mitigating negative impacts on the convivial community called atWar.

In other words: banning people, specially tunder. While allowing RP to be a sp farm.

Napisano od Tundy, 09.10.2014 at 08:33

Napisano od Columna Durruti, 09.10.2014 at 08:03

Napisano od Waffel, 09.10.2014 at 04:49

...and just mute mute mute ban ban ban people.
I think being a mod isn't about this at all...

Being Mod is about channeling efforts/contributions and hindering/mitigating negative impacts on the convivial community called atWar.

In other words: banning people, specially tunder. While allowing RP to be a sp farm.

Stop whining and fiddling your belly button.
You behave well, we don't mute or ban. You get back to your old pattern, we ban or mute you the same way we did before.
Already told in forum: SP retribution per (type of) game is an issue being worked on. Will it be out soon? Probably not. But it will!

I think mods have close to enough sense to see when someone is just kissing ass or making a real effort ( or both!)

Napisano od The Tactician, 09.10.2014 at 08:46

I think mods have close to enough sense to see when someone is just kissing ass or making a real effort ( or both!)

no, some mods are biased. Im not gonna give names, but even some of the mods told me about other mods.
And if they are biased, that also means their choices arent 100% neutral.

Napisano od Waffel, 09.10.2014 at 09:10

Napisano od The Tactician, 09.10.2014 at 08:46

I think mods have close to enough sense to see when someone is just kissing ass or making a real effort ( or both!)

no, some mods are biased. Im not gonna give names, but even some of the mods told me about other mods.
And if they are biased, that also means their choices arent 100% neutral.

Well ya I doubt picks will at any time be 100% neutral. They aren't 100% biased either. Not much to do about that.

The title say a lot...

Napisano od The Tactician, 09.10.2014 at 09:30

Napisano od Waffel, 09.10.2014 at 09:10

Napisano od The Tactician, 09.10.2014 at 08:46

I think mods have close to enough sense to see when someone is just kissing ass or making a real effort ( or both!)

no, some mods are biased. Im not gonna give names, but even some of the mods told me about other mods.
And if they are biased, that also means their choices arent 100% neutral.

Well ya I doubt picks will at any time be 100% neutral. They aren't 100% biased either. Not much to do about that.

Didnt say they were 100% biased <3 i still like most of them. especially CD's quote spam

Napisano od Permamuted, 09.10.2014 at 10:16

Lol subtle waffel... poor clovis =/

you know you love me

Waffle is right though, but still i mean players can evolve and change, especially if you are comparing their behavior from years ago, however yeah clovis hasnt changed much, but he still does have good chance of being mod cause yolo

Napisano od Quantum027, 09.10.2014 at 11:52

Waffle is right though, but still i mean players can evolve and change, especially if you are comparing their behavior from years ago, however yeah clovis hasnt changed much, but he still does have good chance of being mod cause yolo

Napisano od Permamuted, 09.10.2014 at 10:16

Lol subtle waffel... poor clovis =/

Idk why you guys start about clovis? I didnt even mention his name at all? like wow?

!!

Napisano od Waffel, 09.10.2014 at 09:10

Napisano od The Tactician, 09.10.2014 at 08:46

I think mods have close to enough sense to see when someone is just kissing ass or making a real effort ( or both!)

no, some mods are biased. Im not gonna give names, but even some of the mods told me about other mods.
And if they are biased, that also means their choices arent 100% neutral.

Neutrality (like objectivity) is an illusion.

Napisano od Columna Durruti, 10.10.2014 at 16:55

Napisano od Waffel, 09.10.2014 at 09:10

Napisano od The Tactician, 09.10.2014 at 08:46

I think mods have close to enough sense to see when someone is just kissing ass or making a real effort ( or both!)

no, some mods are biased. Im not gonna give names, but even some of the mods told me about other mods.
And if they are biased, that also means their choices arent 100% neutral.

Neutrality (like objectivity) is an illusion.

Napisano od Waffel, 09.10.2014 at 07:31

Napisano od KYBL, 09.10.2014 at 07:24

I don't suck up to mods I spam global right in front of mods!

I spam mods xaxa

Napisano od Waffel, 09.10.2014 at 09:47

Napisano od The Tactician, 09.10.2014 at 09:30

Napisano od Waffel, 09.10.2014 at 09:10

Napisano od The Tactician, 09.10.2014 at 08:46

I think mods have close to enough sense to see when someone is just kissing ass or making a real effort ( or both!)

no, some mods are biased. Im not gonna give names, but even some of the mods told me about other mods.
And if they are biased, that also means their choices arent 100% neutral.

Well ya I doubt picks will at any time be 100% neutral. They aren't 100% biased either. Not much to do about that.

Didnt say they were 100% biased <3 i still like most of them. especially CD's quote spam

I only dislike 1 mod, and i don't care of these new mods i do not think any of them are bad yet.

Waffel for mod 2015

Napisano od Guest14502, 11.10.2014 at 09:44

Waffel for mod 2015

Im starting to like you

Napisano od Waffel, 11.10.2014 at 10:26

Napisano od Guest14502, 11.10.2014 at 09:44

Waffel for mod 2015

Im starting to like you

Napisano od chill, 11.10.2014 at 10:36

Napisano od Waffel, 11.10.2014 at 10:26

Napisano od Guest14502, 11.10.2014 at 09:44

Waffel for mod 2015

Im starting to like you

If mods had to be 100% neutral (objective) most of the high ranks would be permanently muted, some banned for life and eventually wouldn't be able to find new replacements.

Napisano od RaulPB, 16.10.2014 at 18:53

If mods had to be 100% neutral (objective) most of the high ranks would be permanently muted, some banned for life and eventually wouldn't be able to find new replacements.

Not necessarily. Like abusing once or twice global a day, isn't really a ''BIGG reason'' to permanently mute, and rude chatting either.
I see people who say Hi everybody nice day or something on global, getting muted when there is a guy called tik-tok saying 'fk all africas they need to die so we dont get ebola or aids or whatever' getting nothing?

Napisano od Waffel, 17.10.2014 at 04:00

Not necessarily. Like abusing once or twice global a day, isn't really a ''BIGG reason'' to permanently mute, and rude chatting either.
I see people who say Hi everybody nice day or something on global, getting muted when there is a guy called tik-tok saying 'fk all africas they need to die so we dont get ebola or aids or whatever' getting nothing?

Well, if you do that daily... and you play every day of the week... for like 11-12 months a year... it really is a lot of spamming XD If i were mod i'd have it difficult to not mute at least 10 people per day and even have the temptation of banning some others, like in this case you said banning this tik-tok guy...

Napisano od RaulPB, 17.10.2014 at 04:21

Napisano od Waffel, 17.10.2014 at 04:00

Not necessarily. Like abusing once or twice global a day, isn't really a ''BIGG reason'' to permanently mute, and rude chatting either.
I see people who say Hi everybody nice day or something on global, getting muted when there is a guy called tik-tok saying 'fk all africas they need to die so we dont get ebola or aids or whatever' getting nothing?

Well, if you do that daily... and you play every day of the week... for like 11-12 months a year... it really is a lot of spamming XD If i were mod i'd have it difficult to not mute at least 10 people per day and even have the temptation of banning some others, like in this case you said banning this tik-tok guy...

Tik-tok is op
Tik-tok for mod