Fix the game

PD vs PD, cost us the CW, remove rolls alltogether if you must, but fix it.

Did i understand game mechanics wrong? What is odd about the rolls?

Same as above. I played as Turkey and I lost in Romania with 7 infantries and a tank against 6 militia, which eventually cost us the cw.

This is a 3 way battle?

Support, down with lotto rolls!

Make them as an option like sf saied ....dont remove the fun.

Send more units. BOTH of you could have won if you sent 1 more unit.

Napisano od Abraham, 01.12.2017 at 14:27

Same as above. I played as Turkey and I lost in Romania with 7 infantries and a tank against 6 militia, which eventually cost us the cw.

I faild in duel with 8 infs and a tanks

Napisano od Witch-Doctor, 01.12.2017 at 15:34

Send more units. BOTH of you could have won if you sent 1 more unit.

If both of them sent 1 more?

Napisano od Witch-Doctor, 01.12.2017 at 15:34

Send more units. BOTH of you could have won if you sent 1 more unit.

I sent 14 because i expected him to send 10 or 11, by all logic me sending 4 units more than him should guaratee me a win with both of us being same strat.

Cry

Napisano od Acquiesce, 01.12.2017 at 20:13

Cry

WOW MEAN

Napisano od Acquiesce, 01.12.2017 at 20:13

Cry

Booooooooooooooo.

While we're at rolls.. Not sure if sad or hilarious, but the left one lost.

Compliments to CC for ss.

Napisano od Steve Aoki, 02.12.2017 at 00:32

While we're at rolls.. Not sure if sad or hilarious, but the left one lost.

Compliments to CC for ss.

Found Chuck Norris.

Napisano od Steve Aoki, 02.12.2017 at 00:32

While we're at rolls.. Not sure if sad or hilarious, but the left one lost.

Compliments to CC for ss.

1 ferluci militia > any 6 units D

Napisano od Evic, 01.12.2017 at 13:27

PD vs PD, cost us the CW, remove rolls alltogether if you must, but fix it.

nice cry after every loss D
you make every small loss a huge tragic disaster

ghost raped u D

Napisano od Steve Aoki, 02.12.2017 at 00:32

While we're at rolls.. Not sure if sad or hilarious, but the left one lost.

Compliments to CC for ss.

2 gc tanks 3 infantry 1 at lost vs 2 infantry...didnt take ss

Napisano od AlBoZzZ, 02.12.2017 at 05:14

Napisano od Evic, 01.12.2017 at 13:27

PD vs PD, cost us the CW, remove rolls alltogether if you must, but fix it.

nice cry after every loss D
you make every small loss a huge tragic disaster

ghost raped u D

Are you implying that taking rome first turn + sucking up 10 of the enemy troops and a free defensive fortress that will grant advantage over the opponent + the only possible expansion for a spain doesn't effect the game by anyway?
good job MR hypocrite make it more obvious please

Napisano od Witch-Doctor, 01.12.2017 at 15:34

Send more units. BOTH of you could have won if you sent 1 more unit.

you do not know whether the militia had 1-2-3-4-5-6-7 HP so lets say purple added 1(that we do not know if it got the shock from the last unit attack or not lets claim full hp) and battle was ended and turned to 1 inf vs 1 militia who will win? 75%~ same results considering the defender tie
come on who are you convincing with this....... if 14 cannot beat 10 then there is a problem there is a big problem there is a dice throwing not a little part of skills , oh come on a city like rome lost for some kind of bullshit wtf is this... all of people claim they want the bigger numbers to win and here i do not see the bigger numbers winning i just see the bigger number units are doing worse by 40% considering the amount of units advantage
so deal with it and throw 10 inf 10 inf in everywhere and pray for rolls what ever your enemy send thats how the retards want the game to be you weren't there yesterday to see the LB rolls a IMP germany got against my IF uk/france 1dreanaught rolled 34 critical hit and killed 3 of them and at defending so it got another hit because they couldnt kill it and it finished off the 5 dreadnaught vs 1 battle
+3art imp at turkey side killed 3 IF inf defending too
doesn't the critical make the game already none predictable? even rolls?

Napisano od Abraham, 01.12.2017 at 14:27

Same as above. I played as Turkey and I lost in Romania with 7 infantries and a tank against 6 militia, which eventually cost us the cw.

by saying a tank i suppose you were imp and thats legit for a imp 3att inf your tank wont last too long and you can never be sure it will even kill 1 militia before it dies/die after two hits

Napisano od SyrianDevil, 02.12.2017 at 06:22

Napisano od Abraham, 01.12.2017 at 14:27

Same as above. I played as Turkey and I lost in Romania with 7 infantries and a tank against 6 militia, which eventually cost us the cw.

by saying a tank i suppose you were imp and thats legit for a imp 3att inf your tank wont last too long and you can never be sure it will even kill 1 militia before it dies/die after two hits

It's still annoying. Most of the times when I do this I win 80 if not 90 percent of the time and most of the time with 2 or more soldiers who stay alive.
Here's a screenshot of the result I had when I tried it again:






I didn't fail any of these battles with the same number of units I sent in the cw game, which means that the amount I sent was supposed to be close to 100 percent sure I would succeed, but I failed...

Just for clarification. None of us want the rolls system removed or anything. We are just asking for a little more consistency. 9 sm bombers 3 inf failing an 8 inf neutral is not ok. Skills, strategy and good decision making should decide a game. Not lotto rolls. Is this such an outrageous thing to ask for?

Napisano od Acquiesce, 01.12.2017 at 20:13

Cry

Lmao this is how the games always been , its funny when ppl start QQing just cuz its a CW and not on their favor xD

Napisano od Permamuted, 02.12.2017 at 09:30

Just for clarification. None of us want the rolls system removed or anything. We are just asking for a little more consistency. 9 sm bombers 3 inf failing an 8 inf neutral is not ok. Skills, strategy and good decision making should decide a game. Not lotto rolls. Is this such an outrageous thing to ask for?

Well actually u can consider that, thanks to those loto rolls, u are closer to reality than with mathematics.

Maybe your troops had gastroenteritis ?

More seriously even if it fuck your strategy sometimes, the fact that rolls aren't always conform to your expectations are a good thing. 1st it contributes to equality between pro players and noobies (who don't know the rules) ; 2nd. As i said it add something based on reality : humans, wars aren't maths, aren't logics, u can put on on the spirit of the troops for example.

+ the rolls never exceed a certain rate of inconsistency (except in a few occasions, ok).

Napisano od Guest, 02.12.2017 at 10:48

Napisano od Permamuted, 02.12.2017 at 09:30

Just for clarification. None of us want the rolls system removed or anything. We are just asking for a little more consistency. 9 sm bombers 3 inf failing an 8 inf neutral is not ok. Skills, strategy and good decision making should decide a game. Not lotto rolls. Is this such an outrageous thing to ask for?

Well actually u can consider that, thanks to those loto rolls, u are closer to reality than with mathematics.

Maybe your troops had gastroenteritis ?

then we demand:
1- ranks for troops and experience to decide their roll/states
2- support units to boost the army's rolls
3- weather in each country
4- difference rolls for attackers in turn 4 (winter)
5- Option of withdrawal of units when they seem they are going to lose a battle based upon player's commands (quit battle on 50% lose etc)
that would get us closer to real world rather then syria declares war on isreal and gets nice rolls to win

Citat:

Citat:

then we demand:
1- ranks for troops and experience to decide their roll/states
2- support units to boost the army's rolls
3- weather in each country
4- difference rolls for attackers in turn 4 (winter)
5- Option of withdrawal of units when they seem they are going to lose a battle based upon player's commands (quit battle on 50% lose etc)
that would get us closer to real world rather then syria declares war on isreal and gets nice rolls to win

+ 1k

It should actually be possible to buy (very high cost) field officer, or air marshall, on 1 city for example, and 1 every reinf turn. Easy to do.

Napisano od Guest, 02.12.2017 at 10:48

Napisano od Permamuted, 02.12.2017 at 09:30

Just for clarification. None of us want the rolls system removed or anything. We are just asking for a little more consistency. 9 sm bombers 3 inf failing an 8 inf neutral is not ok. Skills, strategy and good decision making should decide a game. Not lotto rolls. Is this such an outrageous thing to ask for?

Well actually u can consider that, thanks to those loto rolls, u are closer to reality than with mathematics.

Maybe your troops had gastroenteritis ?

More seriously even if it fuck your strategy sometimes, the fact that rolls aren't always conform to your expectations are a good thing. 1st it contributes to equality between pro players and noobies (who don't know the rules) ; 2nd. As i said it add something based on reality : humans, wars aren't maths, aren't logics, u can put on on the spirit of the troops for example.

+ the rolls never exceed a certain rate of inconsistency (except in a few occasions, ok).

Its a strategy game not an rl simulation. When was the last time you halted an entire army with a 3 man wall over a city

Citat:

Citat:

Its a strategy game not an rl simulation. When was the last time you halted an entire army with a 3 man wall over a city

Well i always considered that it was trench and fort, with anti-air protection.

I'm just saying that hazard is important too (and sometimes it takes u down really badly, that's life). U cannot dissociate strategy from hazard., there is always a part of it.