The new Elo-based CW rankings - are they good?

Totally support CLANS NEED AT LEAST 5-10 CWS TO BE UP AT LEADERBOARD.
syrian shut it, your noob troll clan plays 4 cws and somehow is top 5?are we serious now? and other clans who have 20 and 30 cws are below? go delete fake clan.

Yes. I said in my thread about the CW system that we needed a minimum CW requirement.

I had advised 40+ CW's to be listed on the leader boards, but some seem resistant to it. 30+ games seem to give a decent enough sample size.

Please make seasons require 30 Coalition Wars minimum to be listed.

Yas_yas_yas

Napisano od Diaa_E_k, 12.04.2015 at 15:17

Yas_yas_yas

yes*

Hmm i voted at the start of the season that i like it but now at the end of the season i would like to change my vote it does not seem like it can evaluate ranking of clans correctly maybe a possibility is to have the elo go no less than 950 than it can show more accurately.

I find it funny almost 1k voted but we don't even have 100 comp player xD

Napisano od Helly, 17.07.2015 at 14:50

I find it funny almost 1k voted but we don't even have 100 comp player xD

Napisano od Helly, 17.07.2015 at 14:50

I find it funny almost 1k voted but we don't even have 100 comp player xD

I agree but the above image might explain why, if it is on the home page of every aw player