Hybrid warfare Not so great

How to use this strategy in a tight space? Also how to play with it in a 3 vs 3 situation. The strategy weakness is high. Marine are weak and cost like a gureilla warfare; also, it loses bonus against infantry. Tanks its strong offense. Sky Menance, the holy sky strategy, Bombers will cleanse the HW tanks easily and plus its expensive. Infantry is weak but strong defence and its expensive. Once your tanks are wipe out your HW infantry can just hide in the corner weeping, while your enemy expand. Playing this strategy makes me think of going offense. Militia have no significant value
Money: If you like money you to north- western Europe. Problems: Expensive transport.
submarine is like mos: umm, its stealth is useless in tight close fight.
HW vs Sky Menance: good luck reaching his cap.

Its Bonuses is spread wide and thin.
its has weakness everywhere.
Marine/ infantry combination weak- Epensive infantry, weak offense
Marine/ tank combination- no defenses good luck
tank/infantry- lose of of them you die or you suffocate of money.


AT_war battle system: make this strategy weak .
Conclusion: Don't buy this strategy unless you have no more upgrade to spend with your sp.

You clearly don't know how to use it, i seen Ctulhu DOMNIATE in scenarios with it.

Napisano od Cpt.Magic, 29.03.2014 at 17:21

You clearly don't know how to use it, i seen Ctulhu DOMNIATE in scenarios with it.

He needs to make a video making moves i that scenarios and wining. I need help with this strategy

Hybrid warfare is somehow combination of PD and other strategies.

Napisano od THE_Militia, 30.03.2014 at 04:00

Hybrid warfare is somehow combination of PD and other strategies.

Its hard to control it because its income hungry. 5k game its dies fast. your miltia have low defence. The strategy make it more of an offensive strategy.

Transport is expensive .
France is bad with this. Germany needs transport for scanadavia, submarine if used, will get annihilated by a sky menance's bomber of a Ukraine player.
Iron fist vs. HW - you get equivalent of a 2 attack and 2 defence, but you get a chance to roll the dices twice if the enemy unit can't kill the IF unit.
Hw dunno yet but i know it can be beaten by IF.
Sky menance vs. Hw - SM's range is too strong for HW. Walling is expensive for Hw. if you can't wall you die and sky menance can break as may wall as they can.

HW is just bad Can't fit anywhere. It is like GC + GW, but the expensive cost of infantries makes you unable to spam them (infantries are main unit in most strats), the tanks cost is also hard to manage, you cannot properly use marines since they have -1 attack and militias can't defend. There is lack of both, offensive and defensive units use.

For me, HW only works in World Games..
But like alex said, "its just bad". ^^

Napisano od hedinho, 01.04.2014 at 14:23

For me, HW only works in World Games..
But like alex said, "its just bad". ^^

I have to agree. Miltias, infantries, marines, and tanks all get bonuses and nerfs which is fine. However, bombers and stealth bombers become terrible. Transports become terrible because their range is awful and they cost more. Subs become terrible for attacking. I just can't see myself picking this over Sky Menace or Blitzkrieg.

Don't forget that submarines get 1+ defense against bombers.Also this may work for militias.Since they have same attack as infantry's which is good.and 1+ range well this may cause problem maybe 2+ range would be better.Also infantry's are so expensive to buy and good in defese.Tanks? 1+attack -3 defence? Really this is like GC so bad. Let's go on next one... Marines well you can put them off the list for attacking they are useless so cheap but nor attack and defense are good.Submarines they are also cheap but too poor.Transports are like in GW Bombers and Stealth airplanes are so weak no for use.

So HW have more bad sides then good sides, it needs to be upgraded!

I agree that it isn't good enough to use in games where other people are using Sky Meance, Blitz and Master of Stealth.