HYbrid Warfare

This strategy is useless, marine+ infantry combo does not work.

You can't Beat Enemy's large stack. And its not to be played as a defence strategy.
This strategy is only to be use as an offensive Strategy.
marine useless, use it for offense only.
infantry, GC is stronger than this strat. HW= -3 attck, Gc= - 2 attck

Honestly, I'd prefer if it was just removed. I thought the idea for the strategy was bad when it was implemented. You can use infantry/marine combos in MOS just fine. But that is just my opinion. Also, GC infantry have -3 attack and +1 HP. HW infantry have -3 attack and +1 defense with an additional 25 to cost.

This strategy is the most expensive upgrade in the game, so due to that it should be one of the finest/strongest. Would be nice if Amok or Ivan start listening to what players say about upgrades since they wouldn't know that much about the game since they don't play it? That's just my opinion... If not then HW should be like 5k instead of 30k if HW isn't boosted. I think it should be something like -4 attk to inf but +2-3 HP, and -3 defense to marines but +1 HP and +2k Attack... That may sound over exaggerated, but that would make it stronk tbh, and would be played for Ukr in 3on3 tbh.. Maybe even stronger than what I suggested since it's so expensive!

Give HW imperialist militia with no range.

Napisano od Permamuted, 10.04.2014 at 09:49

It needs a boost for sure, expense being the main issue, atm the nerfs far outweigh the boosts

You are correct

Eh idk

As i see Hybrid warfare have more weakness then bonuses.This strategy is almost unplayable.

Boost hybrid warfare please the poll says so

Napisano od Spart, 10.04.2014 at 09:17

Honestly, I'd prefer if it was just removed. I thought the idea for the strategy was bad when it was implemented. You can use infantry/marine combos in MOS just fine. But that is just my opinion. Also, GC infantry have -3 attack and +1 HP. HW infantry have -3 attack and +1 defense with an additional 25 to cost.

In comparison

It should be removed as it is of no use, expensive and cannot be used without prem.

Napisano od Flaming Spaz, 10.05.2014 at 10:36

It should be removed as it is of no use, expensive and cannot be used without prem.

Remove cuz cant be used without prem? that's like saying "remove DS,LB,IF,GC"

Napisano od Guest, 10.05.2014 at 10:38

Napisano od Flaming Spaz, 10.05.2014 at 10:36

It should be removed as it is of no use, expensive and cannot be used without prem.

Remove cuz cant be used without prem? that's like saying "remove DS,LB,IF,GC"

DS, LB, IF, and GC comes for free after buy prem but HW doesn't.

Napisano od Flaming Spaz, 10.05.2014 at 11:16

Napisano od Guest, 10.05.2014 at 10:38

Napisano od Flaming Spaz, 10.05.2014 at 10:36

It should be removed as it is of no use, expensive and cannot be used without prem.

Remove cuz cant be used without prem? that's like saying "remove DS,LB,IF,GC"

DS, LB, IF, and GC comes for free after buy prem but HW doesn't.

Idc, the reason you said "and cannot be used without prem.", which is just pathetic. You're complaining cuz it's for only prem and cuz u cant afford it via sp..

Napisano od Guest, 10.05.2014 at 11:23

Napisano od Flaming Spaz, 10.05.2014 at 11:16

Napisano od Guest, 10.05.2014 at 10:38

Napisano od Flaming Spaz, 10.05.2014 at 10:36

It should be removed as it is of no use, expensive and cannot be used without prem.

Remove cuz cant be used without prem? that's like saying "remove DS,LB,IF,GC"

DS, LB, IF, and GC comes for free after buy prem but HW doesn't.

Idc, the reason you said "and cannot be used without prem.", which is just pathetic. You're complaining cuz it's for only prem and cuz u cant afford it via sp..

I think you know that GC is better than it.

Napisano od Flaming Spaz, 10.05.2014 at 11:26

Napisano od Guest, 10.05.2014 at 11:23

Napisano od Flaming Spaz, 10.05.2014 at 11:16

Napisano od Guest, 10.05.2014 at 10:38

Napisano od Flaming Spaz, 10.05.2014 at 10:36

It should be removed as it is of no use, expensive and cannot be used without prem.

Remove cuz cant be used without prem? that's like saying "remove DS,LB,IF,GC"

DS, LB, IF, and GC comes for free after buy prem but HW doesn't.

Idc, the reason you said "and cannot be used without prem.", which is just pathetic. You're complaining cuz it's for only prem and cuz u cant afford it via sp..

I think you know that GC is better than it.

what does GC have to do with anything?

Napisano od Guest, 10.05.2014 at 11:30

Napisano od Flaming Spaz, 10.05.2014 at 11:26

Napisano od Guest, 10.05.2014 at 11:23

Napisano od Flaming Spaz, 10.05.2014 at 11:16

Napisano od Guest, 10.05.2014 at 10:38

Napisano od Flaming Spaz, 10.05.2014 at 10:36

It should be removed as it is of no use, expensive and cannot be used without prem.

Remove cuz cant be used without prem? that's like saying "remove DS,LB,IF,GC"

DS, LB, IF, and GC comes for free after buy prem but HW doesn't.

Idc, the reason you said "and cannot be used without prem.", which is just pathetic. You're complaining cuz it's for only prem and cuz u cant afford it via sp..

I think you know that GC is better than it.

what does GC have to do with anything?

As critical said,

Napisano od Htin, 05.04.2014 at 14:20

You can't Beat Enemy's large stack. And its not to be played as a defence strategy.
This strategy is only to be use as an offensive Strategy.
marine useless, use it for offense only.
infantry, GC is stronger than this strat. HW= -3 attck, Gc= - 2 attck