What is the best or top Strategies?

GW/MoS can shit all over SM.
Impi can shit all over SM.
GC can shit all over SM.

The player is more important than the strat. If you're getting beaten consistantly by SM it's because you're not very good.

Napisano od Barrymore, 16.06.2012 at 11:11

GW/MoS can shit all over SM.
Impi can shit all over SM.
GC can shit all over SM.

The player is more important than the strat. If you're getting beaten consistantly by SM it's because you're not very good.

but some times,the OP strategy makes the player
i mean seriously? when you can make marines with 8 attack and 3 defence,you can make EXTREMLY overpowered bombers,with the same attack and 6 defence points,it makes the strategy balanced on asia or something,but it messes it up when europe is using it on the middle east or another europe player

Well because the Marines are invisible? You don't seem to factor that into your calculations.

A marine player can and should attack anywhere. If you've got walls broken on the turn before reinforcements you can't afford to not respond to the threat. The difference is that if an SM player attacks your walls you know exactly where and how many places he can attack. A marines player could break every wall in East Asia. You can't defend properly against an attack by an unknown amount of enemies that may not even happen. The player could have just broken every wall to cost you all your reinforcements and money for one turn.

Now I won't deny that a bad SM player will beat a bad player of any other strat because the skill cap is non existant. That's more to do with the strat being based around one super unit because no one uses the Stealth Bombers. It's not overpowered though. SM can beat and can be beaten by pretty much every working strat in the game... naturally LB doesn't count.

I would say, 2 Players with the Same Skill are playing, then the SM Player had advantages. SM is not unbeatable, but easy to play and strong enougth to make the Win easier.

For the Example Mos vs SM, to crush a stack of 100 Bombers, i need round about 70 Marines. to destroy a Stack of 100 Marines 50 Bombers make the Job...
When i (as MoS) capture a Enemy City, i need to build something to defend it, because Marines had no defence, When a SM Player takes a City, it is Walleed and full of well defending Bombers...

Of Cause, like Barrymore said as MoS i had my advantages too, but with Sentrys you could take my Advantages Away, and How can i take away the High Defence of SM Bombers?

I use MoS, SM, GW and IMP

Napisano od Hugosch, 16.10.2011 at 15:15

Useless strategy's:
- MoS (it needs a boost, at this moment GW is a better alternative)

GW better alternative?

-Infantry ruined and completly useless:
Militia only 5 defence and 4 range, Infantry in normal state including master of stealth have 6 defence and 6 range
Meanwhile Master of Stealth have a good defence, Guerrilla warfare dont have a decent unit of defence in land.

-Transports are expensive:
Yes marines are really cheap, but all the money you save in marines you are going to waste it for 2 or 3 times in transports and air transports.

-Master of Stealth improvements are better than Guerrilla warfare improvements:
GW only have a bit better militia, and marines in the 50% of prize (but with a high prize in transports).
Master of Stealth have a bit better marine with 80%-85% of prize, have better submarines of any other strategy except naval commander with the 80% of prize, have amazing Stealth with the 66% of prize, and only with worst tanks and destroyers.

You can replace tanks for marines in both strategies but you cant replace infantry for militia in GW.
If you need make in one turn defence in one city you can send your infantry and some units in transports in MoS.
With GW you maybe cant do it because militia and infantry have a shit range and transports is not an option if you dont want bankrupt, and of course def of militia and infantry arent enough for any, bombers probably better option for GW but they are a bit expensive.
The bad side of Master of Stealth are Destroyers, they are a bit worst than normal and you cant replace they at all with submarines.

Now say me how can be GW better option than MoS.

Napisano od raetahcodeupon, 08.07.2012 at 04:51

Now say me how can be GW better option than MoS.

Are you serious? -> Written by Hugosch on 16.10.2011 at 16:15. A lot of things have changed since then.....

Napisano od Hugosch, 08.07.2012 at 05:15

Napisano od raetahcodeupon, 08.07.2012 at 04:51

Now say me how can be GW better option than MoS.

Are you serious? -> Written by Hugosch on 16.10.2011 at 16:15. A lot of things have changed since then.....

Im never serious.

To be honest, desert storm is the greatest strategy ever, it just isn't used as much because people think helicopters pollute the air more than SM bombers.



The greatness of desert storm alaska must never be known/

MoS is good with faster marines upgrade... With MoS +2 Movement for them...
SM is good,fast and powerfull...
GW is very good with 5k or 3k games
I hate Blitz

Napisano od raetahcodeupon, 09.07.2012 at 10:10

Napisano od Hugosch, 08.07.2012 at 05:15

Napisano od raetahcodeupon, 08.07.2012 at 04:51

Now say me how can be GW better option than MoS.

Are you serious? -> Written by Hugosch on 16.10.2011 at 16:15. A lot of things have changed since then.....

Im never serious.

you're still wrong though. GW is better. You get OP marines for a cheap price and you get good militia for facerolls. Militia comes free with every capped city. In my opinion, GW has some of the easiest expansion after 1st turn, and is indeed a better strat than MoS in most cases. Militia can defend well too, whereas a lot of the time people play MoS by just spamming marines, meaning what they cap is extremely fragile.

I concur with Vagineer.

Im disagree, im the general of generals in marine style.

Napisano od CIA, 12.07.2012 at 10:56

To be honest, desert storm is the greatest strategy ever, it just isn't used as much because people think helicopters pollute the air more than SM bombers.



The greatness of desert storm alaska must never be known/

I agree. Belarus DS is op against Turkey

Napisano od Guest, 18.07.2012 at 11:46

I agree. Belarus DS is op against Turkey

the gorgeous reckoner has proven that no

Napisano od reckoner., 18.07.2012 at 18:59

Napisano od Guest, 18.07.2012 at 11:46

I agree. Belarus DS is op against Turkey

the gorgeous reckoner has proven that no

You've turnblocked me with 1 unit my infantries. You got lucky as shit..

Best strat is NC or Blitz

Napisano od Fruit, 20.07.2012 at 02:55

Best strat is NC or Blitz

Are you kidding me? Best strats are LB, TG, and DS. Or None, if you're into that. None is so OP.

Napisano od Mathdino, 20.07.2012 at 02:57

Napisano od Fruit, 20.07.2012 at 02:55

Best strat is NC or Blitz

Are you kidding me? Best strats are LB, TG, and DS. Or None, if you're into that. None is so OP.

Yfw I'm not even joking, Blitz is good in big maps if nobody is nearby(also very nice for rushing, I'd say it is better than SM at this even) and NC is hilariously powerful on the coasts (pretty much every rich area in the world has a coast too, so this is glorious)

also don't be so down on DS, strat is actually pretty good. TG and LB is a lost hope though, strats will never be good heh.

I thing none strategy is best

Napisano od raetahcodeupon, 08.07.2012 at 04:51

Napisano od Hugosch, 16.10.2011 at 15:15

Useless strategy's:
- MoS (it needs a boost, at this moment GW is a better alternative)

GW better alternative?

-Infantry ruined and completly useless:
Militia only 5 defence and 4 range, Infantry in normal state including master of stealth have 6 defence and 6 range
Meanwhile Master of Stealth have a good defence, Guerrilla warfare dont have a decent unit of defence in land.

-Transports are expensive:
Yes marines are really cheap, but all the money you save in marines you are going to waste it for 2 or 3 times in transports and air transports.

-Master of Stealth improvements are better than Guerrilla warfare improvements:
GW only have a bit better militia, and marines in the 50% of prize (but with a high prize in transports).
Master of Stealth have a bit better marine with 80%-85% of prize, have better submarines of any other strategy except naval commander with the 80% of prize, have amazing Stealth with the 66% of prize, and only with worst tanks and destroyers.

You can replace tanks for marines in both strategies but you cant replace infantry for militia in GW.
If you need make in one turn defence in one city you can send your infantry and some units in transports in MoS.
With GW you maybe cant do it because militia and infantry have a shit range and transports is not an option if you dont want bankrupt, and of course def of militia and infantry arent enough for any, bombers probably better option for GW but they are a bit expensive.
The bad side of Master of Stealth are Destroyers, they are a bit worst than normal and you cant replace they at all with submarines.

Now say me how can be GW better option than MoS.

the price is what matters,with GW,you can still make decent offensive and expensions even in bad areas,and it might be the way to win as africa. i allways use it as israel to TRY and kill europe

Gl winning with gw against sm in 50k while u next to each other omg guys you were quite useless it seems

Napisano od Nations, 29.05.2017 at 03:06

Gl winning with gw against sm in 50k while u next to each other omg guys you were quite useless it seems

well gl winning with sm against gw in 5k while u next to each other

Napisano od LukeTan, 29.05.2017 at 05:38

Napisano od Nations, 29.05.2017 at 03:06

Gl winning with gw against sm in 50k while u next to each other omg guys you were quite useless it seems

well gl winning with sm against gw in 5k while u next to teach other

every strat has its min funds

Every strats has it's niches, its spots, it's leaks and advantage on early/middle/late game.
Sm and Gw can't be compared.
Bye bye

Napisano od Chess, 02.06.2017 at 20:07

It's pretty obvious.

Strategy none!

Napisano od reckoner., 18.07.2012 at 18:59

Napisano od Guest, 18.07.2012 at 11:46

I agree. Belarus DS is op against Turkey

the gorgeous reckoner has proven that no

<333333333333333

Didn't help!!!!!!