We need 30sec turn option

For world games

Да (ukrainian for yes)

Napisano od opi, 08.08.2015 at 09:47

In

we need 30 sec turns

Napisano od Skanderbeg, 18.08.2015 at 13:00

Да (russian for yes)

agreed

Da-da-ism ...cuz you both fucked up. xD

It takes 30 seconds for a turn to load for me

Napisano od Skanderbeg, 18.08.2015 at 13:00

Да (Croatian for yes)

N.

Good luck if you d/c

Absolutely no!!!

Sport

No think about the people with lag, just excluding a whole group of players from games...

Napisano od The Tactician, 18.08.2015 at 16:39

No think about the people with lag, just excluding a whole group of players from games...

don't like it don't play it

Napisano od Guest, 18.08.2015 at 20:53

Napisano od The Tactician, 18.08.2015 at 16:39

No think about the people with lag, just excluding a whole group of players from games...

don't like it don't play it

dont like the comment, dont read it

Napisano od Your Monkey, 18.08.2015 at 15:37

Napisano od Guest, 18.08.2015 at 20:53

Napisano od The Tactician, 18.08.2015 at 16:39

No think about the people with lag, just excluding a whole group of players from games...

don't like it don't play it

im going to emphasize on the most important part of the quote because apparently you cant/didnt read

Napisano od The Tactician, 18.08.2015 at 16:39

just excluding a whole group of players from games...

Citat:

Citat:

im going to emphasize on the most important part of the quote because apparently you cant/didnt read

Napisano od The Tactician, 18.08.2015 at 16:39

just excluding a whole group of players from games...

If you understand what an option is, you will also know that you will be able to pick out of a number of possible turn times. a 30s option will be a very niche thing that only people who are interested in will use, its not like 3v3 will transition to this time setting. its narcissistic to say that the players who want to be able to try something like this should be excluded just because you wouldn't be able to hypothetically use something that you would never want to try anyway since you don't play fast games

opi is sexy

The point is just having that 30 sec turn option for players excludes a bigger group of players than the ones with fast connections and are willing to test it. There is a lack of 1 min games in the first place, why go to the extreme if it will prove a burden rather than a perk. Yes I won't be able to play it, and every other player with lag. While you will be able to, and every other player without lag and willing to experiment with 30 sec turns (about 2(?)% of AW community?).

Napisano od The Tactician, 19.08.2015 at 14:52

The point is just having that 30 sec turn option for players excludes a bigger group of players than the ones with fast connections and are willing to test it. There is a lack of 1 min games in the first place, why go to the extreme if it will prove a burden rather than a perk. Yes I won't be able to play it, and every other player with lag. While you will be able to, and every other player without lag and willing to experiment with 30 sec turns (about 2(?)% of AW community?).

this wouldn't exclude anybody, it would add another option to the game. if you aren't able to use it, that's your problem, the purpose is to allow for a more fast-paced playing option. i don't see your being jealous about others' superior internet to be a valid argument against implementing this, as your gameplay experience wouldn't be otherwise affected.

Napisano od Guest, 19.08.2015 at 16:54

Napisano od The Tactician, 19.08.2015 at 14:52

The point is just having that 30 sec turn option for players excludes a bigger group of players than the ones with fast connections and are willing to test it. There is a lack of 1 min games in the first place, why go to the extreme if it will prove a burden rather than a perk. Yes I won't be able to play it, and every other player with lag. While you will be able to, and every other player without lag and willing to experiment with 30 sec turns (about 2(?)% of AW community?).

this wouldn't exclude anybody, it would add another option to the game. if you aren't able to use it, that's your problem, the purpose is to allow for a more fast-paced playing option. i don't see your being jealous about others' superior internet to be a valid argument against implementing this, as your gameplay experience wouldn't be otherwise affected.

It would exclude a lot of people by adding this new game option. It gives people with superior internet an option others don't. tbh u should be arguing why the exclusion is fine not blatantly stating it wouldn't exclude anybody. As I stated it wouldn't do a high majority of the community, therefore it would be useless to implement especially with the admins working on HTML5 and everything. And I'm fine with a fast paced game option if the community will play it, but think about these words that i'll end this useless argument with; we already have 1 min and its underplayed compared to everything else (5 min and under), and players with lag still struggle with that. Now these are my last words here because you aren't really providing any points except ''dont be jealous'' and '' its your own problem'' .

Citat:

Citat:

It would exclude a lot of people by adding this new game option. It gives people with superior internet an option others don't. tbh u should be arguing why the exclusion is fine not blatantly stating it wouldn't exclude anybody. As I stated it wouldn't do a high majority of the community, therefore it would be useless to implement especially with the admins working on HTML5 and everything. And I'm fine with a fast paced game option if the community will play it, but think about these words that i'll end this useless argument with; we already have 1 min and its underplayed compared to everything else (5 min and under), and players with lag still struggle with that. Now these are my last words here because you aren't really providing any points except ''dont be jealous'' and '' its your own problem'' .

you're the one who hasn't provided any points to support your argument apart from stating that you'll be butthurt that u can't play something that others can. this would take little effort to implement and would be beneficial to those who play fast games while at the same time not negatively affecting anybody else's experience. with your logic one could say that world games should be removed because they take too long to play and "exclude" those who can't spend as much time on atwar

People who are comfortable and thrive in 60 second turns are the freaky lightning fast exceptions and not the norm like us mere mortals who suffer from lag and disconnection issues. Ixnay to the the 30 seconds move thing. It would probably be the most underused feature of atWar.