New Option Game : Choose what turn (2-6) we can attack others players

Thank you to let your opinion also

WE need an option for sure !

Yes I think so. i'm tired to repeat everytimes same things to players to dont attack (until turn 4) for RP ....

I have no idea what this is about but my vote still counts!!!

Lollz turn 2 for all games it shud be
DELETE RP

Usually we can attack turn 2 any players, it's why we can still have option to use turn 2 for others maps and not rp. It's why I say turn 2 (for normal game) and more turn for RP and MapMakers. MapMakers make many efforts to have new maps to enjoy our community but it's could be ruined the game if players rogue and don't respect the rules of the map. It happening often...

I don't see "Rimuv RP" option here. Shit poll.

Yes Rogues just destroy the Environemt of RP

Napisano od Guest, 19.05.2016 at 04:46

I don't see "Rimuv RP" option here. Shit poll.

Njab, this poll is for RP players and mapmakers.
If you dont want play RP, just ignore this poll ;-)

Napisano od your_PROUD, 19.05.2016 at 04:46

Yes Rogues just destroy the Environemt of RP

Exactly and can destroy also the pleasure to play a good RP map.

Em..... it certainly is not a priority but you could have it as an option for map makers.

The 'Yes' option is going to win, because of the sheer number of RP fa- players on this game.

Voted 'No', although this poll really needs a 'Hell Naw!' option.

Napisano od RaulPB, 19.05.2016 at 08:09

Em..... it certainly is not a priority but you could have it as an option for map makers.

Having it as an option for custom map-makers, is AW speak for: 'Its useless, and a lot of people don't want it, but we're too fed-up to argue about it, so let's compromise'

Lol NO NO NO

Napisano od Darth., 19.05.2016 at 08:51

Having it as an option for custom map-makers, is AW speak for: 'Its useless, and a lot of people don't want it, but we're too fed-up to argue about it, so let's compromise'

Well.... kinda...

I simply don't want to argue about this which has already been sugggested before. If you say yes, you're admitting it's useful, which it doesn't really is; and if you say no, RP fa - players will think you're a RP hater and a bad person because there's no reason whatsoever for not having such feature as an option since it would not harm us in any way directly, which also is a bit untrue since that would enable lots of narb map makers to make "no war maps"...

Only way I see this being useful would be so Russia and Japan don't attack each other right away in ww2