British Colonialism

Napisano od ulvi., 23.03.2018 at 11:32

Serbian dog should understand that big part of this causlities happened after russian backed coup in Azerbaijan. Also russia and armenian lobby funded that war. If you want to compare Azerbaijan and Armenian go search for 4 days war which happened in 2016. While Azerbaijan army pushing armenians were begging to russia and russia stopped our advancemnt with their lies so stfu fucking slav/.

Switch to christianity, you might stop losing so much and be weak in combat.

Napisano od Wheelo, 23.03.2018 at 15:56

When you have a crusader knight as your avatar you automatically lose all credibility for what you say afterwards.
Honestly mate there's always a negative vibe from your forum posts, take up a sport, its a good way to vent out all that edgy-ness you have built up.

Does that apply to me as well? My avatar is a terrorist expert in biochemical mass destruction warfare.

I like weapons of mass destruction which does not leave trace afterwards like nuclear fallout does, am i baddie?

Napisano od Viruslegion, 23.03.2018 at 17:33

Napisano od Franz, 23.03.2018 at 15:29

Nice, and thanks. Good healing to you!

Thank you,

So the reason I say colonialism is inherently good is because when it comes down to it in order for a people to be colonized they need to be inferior in some way (such as technologically) to the colonizer. This isn't meant to be racist or insulting at all, it's just simply true, in order to be colonized you need to be somehow inferior to the one colonizing you. Therefore, since the area and the people will now be under the control of the superior people, they will begin to improve the area and people that have been colonized. In Africa this is evident by the infrastructure, schools, hospitals, and other improvements that Europeans made when they colonized the area. Because of this the people that have been colonized benefit, and the colonizer benefits as well, economically and through the use of the land for things like bases and sometimes fueling stations. From history we also see that given enough time the colonizers tend to release their colonies and give the people there control again. Even though there are examples of colonizing powers being abusive towards the native people, the Belgians in the Congo for example, we can also see other countries, many of whom are also colonizers, speaking up for the people that are being abused so that the abuses are stopped. To sum this up both the colonizers and the people being colonized stand to benefit, the people being colonized by getting more advanced infrastructure, schools, etc. and the colonizer through economic advantages and also sometimes military stations.

Don't you think improvement came after colonization was over (1960's), because all we've seen before that time was resource exploitation and drafting locals for local and world wars? How is chopping off hands, rape, slavery progress for both colonialists and colonized? Or is that part of colonisation side effect like saying great purge and gulag was for USSR?

Because the way i see it, they made slight improvement only by copying european way (infrastructure, laws) after 1950/60s.