Big wall turn 1

Big wall turn 1, allowed to wallfuck it if not entering enemies land? And ofcourse if this wallfuck works, dont hit the actual cap.. For instance in a CW today, I sent a bomber outside turkeys water. not to wallfuck big wall, wasnt even thinking about that, but to break his wall t2 since didnt take RS. I ended up accidentally fucking his big wall.

Big wall meets its maker?

discuss..

No no please no. just no.

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NOT THIS AGAIN NO NO NO NO NO

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO


13 pages issue NOT AGAIN NO NO NO NO NO NON ON NO NO NO NO NO

bye: NO
ewe: NO
Epic_win: NO
suka1812: NO


So let me add the most constructive post to this thread.... JUST NO.

Napisano od clovis1122, 11.04.2015 at 16:30

No no please no. just no.

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NOT THIS AGAIN NO NO NO NO NO

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO


13 pages issue NOT AGAIN NO NO NO NO NO NON ON NO NO NO NO NO

bye: NO
ewe: NO
Epic_win: NO
suka1812: NO


So let me add the most constructive post to this thread.... JUST NO.

It's not about the big wall really, shoulda been more in dephth.. It's about what I did with the bomber. I didn't enter your land, so I did nothing wrong.

"Oh thats like wfing london t1 from france" Sure it is, but i'm not going to hit someone cap turn 2.

I wanted to make a theme about redefining WF..........

Napisano od Mr_Own_U, 11.04.2015 at 16:28

it if not entering enemies land?

Like you tell,you wfed with no entering enemy land,but YOU CAN DO SAME TO LONDON,PARIS,rome......
So i will explain:
I go set bomber in front of rome(water)
He will start to talking that im wfer and idk what,i will say:"my units no in your territory,no wfed",like you did.
So this theme pls to be deleted or locked and make about redefining WF,it will be more useful than this.

Ask illyrians

Notice how he failed to wall in the southeast anyways
While I personally do not support the use of big wall, I do not condone purposely WFing a wall on someone else's land either, whether you enter the land or not.

Napisano od clovis1122, 11.04.2015 at 16:30

No no please no. just no.

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NOT THIS AGAIN NO NO NO NO NO

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO


13 pages issue NOT AGAIN NO NO NO NO NO NON ON NO NO NO NO NO

bye: NO
ewe: NO
Epic_win: NO
suka1812: NO


So let me add the most constructive post to this thread.... JUST NO.

yes

Napisano od Guest, 11.04.2015 at 16:38

Ask illyrians

hahaha

Napisano od Guest, 11.04.2015 at 16:38

Ask illyrians

lol

The Rome example should make clear why it has to be a no. Generally any move in turn 1 that affects the walls in the opponent's home country isn't sportsmanlike.

*Waiting for Goblin to see this*

Napisano od clovis1122, 11.04.2015 at 16:30

No no please no. just no.

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NOT THIS AGAIN NO NO NO NO NO

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO


13 pages issue NOT AGAIN NO NO NO NO NO NON ON NO NO NO NO NO

bye: NO
ewe: NO
Epic_win: NO
suka1812: NO


So let me add the most constructive post to this thread.... JUST NO.

Napisano od Steve Aoki, 11.04.2015 at 17:24

Fock you xD

Napisano od clovis1122, 11.04.2015 at 17:36

Napisano od Steve Aoki, 11.04.2015 at 17:24

Fock you xD

Don't use my name in vain.

Napisano od 1GodofWar1, 11.04.2015 at 16:31

Napisano od clovis1122, 11.04.2015 at 16:30

No no please no. just no.

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NOT THIS AGAIN NO NO NO NO NO

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO


13 pages issue NOT AGAIN NO NO NO NO NO NON ON NO NO NO NO NO

bye: NO
ewe: NO
Epic_win: NO
suka1812: NO


So let me add the most constructive post to this thread.... JUST NO.

Who walls like that?

Napisano od Guest, 11.04.2015 at 20:57

Who walls like that?

noobs.

Nice wf, no support

XAXAXAXAXA MEMORIES. THIS DISCUSSION CAUSED LAOCHRA TO DUMP ME. Anyways no laochra is no life, so I decided to accept ;_;

Anyways u are wallfucking him.

I think people use the "term" of wallfuck as they want or like.

Wallfuck is not only break the wall in the enemy cap wall, wallfuck is some kind of action in first turn like:

- u can´t break enemy walls, cap or cities first turn.
- u can´t join enemy land first turn.
- u can´t put your units near enemy land joinining in the enemy sea, all countries have his part of the sea and you have to respect the supossed limits.

That bomber is already wallfucking.

Why don´t you put it in your land or in romania or another neutral land, what´s the problem about do that if u have enough range?

Napisano od Mr_Own_U, 11.04.2015 at 16:28

Big wall turn 1, allowed to wallfuck it if not entering enemies land? And ofcourse if this wallfuck works, dont hit the actual cap.. For instance in a CW today, I sent a bomber outside turkeys water. not to wallfuck big wall, wasnt even thinking about that, but to break his wall t2 since didnt take RS. I ended up accidentally fucking his big wall.

Big wall meets its maker?

discuss..

You are wallfucking cause joining in his sea.

If this is not allowed, then UK must rush denmark without leaving its boats by hamburg which causes it to wf hamburg wall. Blitz spain must rush austria and czech without leaving it's boats in a position that could wf france city wall. And so on...

I would like to discuss about that kind of wall, cause in my opinion, that´s rewalling.

You are making a wall in fisrt turn for making another one in the second turn with diferent units and diferent position.

That is not a double wall as some players call it.

Double wall is make double wall, so two walls, and enemy needs to break first one ofe them and later the second one.

But this is simply 1 wall changing it with different units and place, but is still the first and only wall.

Napisano od hormigaatomica, 12.04.2015 at 09:02

I would like to discuss about that kind of wall, cause in my opinion, that´s rewalling.

You are making a wall in fisrt turn for making another one in the second turn with diferent units and diferent position.

That is not a double wall as some players call it.

Double wall is make double wall, so two walls, and enemy needs to break first one ofe them and later the second one.

But this is simply 1 wall changing it with different units and place, but is still the first and only wall.

You are like 3 months to late to discuss about it. Therefore this thread is pretty much copy of mine.

Napisano od Waffel, 12.04.2015 at 10:24

Napisano od hormigaatomica, 12.04.2015 at 09:02

I would like to discuss about that kind of wall, cause in my opinion, that´s rewalling.

You are making a wall in fisrt turn for making another one in the second turn with diferent units and diferent position.

That is not a double wall as some players call it.

Double wall is make double wall, so two walls, and enemy needs to break first one ofe them and later the second one.

But this is simply 1 wall changing it with different units and place, but is still the first and only wall.

You are like 3 months to late to discuss about it. Therefore this thread is pretty much copy of mine.

Is there already a thread about it?

Napisano od hormigaatomica, 12.04.2015 at 10:29

Napisano od Waffel, 12.04.2015 at 10:24

Napisano od hormigaatomica, 12.04.2015 at 09:02

I would like to discuss about that kind of wall, cause in my opinion, that´s rewalling.

You are making a wall in fisrt turn for making another one in the second turn with diferent units and diferent position.

That is not a double wall as some players call it.

Double wall is make double wall, so two walls, and enemy needs to break first one ofe them and later the second one.

But this is simply 1 wall changing it with different units and place, but is still the first and only wall.

You are like 3 months to late to discuss about it. Therefore this thread is pretty much copy of mine.

Is there already a thread about it?

A 500 posts thread is about it yes. Link is here but dont start it, just read it and you can see how it is: http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=16005

Napisano od Fockmeeard, 12.04.2015 at 08:57

If this is not allowed, then UK must rush denmark without leaving its boats by hamburg which causes it to wf hamburg wall. Blitz spain must rush austria and czech without leaving it's boats in a position that could wf france city wall. And so on...

This is different, that´s not a transport, is a bomber set there on purpose.

U need the transports to atack denmark or austria as u say.

And if you wallfuck with them , then just be fair and don´t atack next turn.

Napisano od Waffel, 12.04.2015 at 10:30

Napisano od hormigaatomica, 12.04.2015 at 10:29

Napisano od Waffel, 12.04.2015 at 10:24

Napisano od hormigaatomica, 12.04.2015 at 09:02

I would like to discuss about that kind of wall, cause in my opinion, that´s rewalling.

You are making a wall in fisrt turn for making another one in the second turn with diferent units and diferent position.

That is not a double wall as some players call it.

Double wall is make double wall, so two walls, and enemy needs to break first one ofe them and later the second one.

But this is simply 1 wall changing it with different units and place, but is still the first and only wall.

You are like 3 months to late to discuss about it. Therefore this thread is pretty much copy of mine.

Is there already a thread about it?

A 500 posts thread is about it yes. Link is here but dont start it, just read it and you can see how it is: http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=16005

Thanks, not going to read that so long, neither copy that link