Kupite Premium da sakrijete sve reklame
Objave: 460   Posjećeno od: 147 users

Orginalna objava

Objavljeno od KYBL, 11.01.2015 - 13:03
In light of Martell announcing that he is going to take down his RP map, it brings up another important issue, that of how much power a mapmaker should have.

Martell is taking down his map because his ban list is not being respected. The children who played his map would go to moderators because they think that their bans were "unfair" or "unjust" and the moderators would then step in and threaten Martell.

This is a disgusting abuse of moderator's powers. Moderators are here to enforce the AtWar basic rules so that AtWar can be a safe environment and free from spam and trolls. They are not here to regulate mapmakers. Mapmakers are the people who keep this game running, as without their maps, far less people would play AtWar. It is the hard work and creativity of the mapmakers that makes this game special. Moderators stepping in and regulating does not make the game any safer or better, it only causes mapmakers to close down their maps, feel bullied by "big government", and sometimes even flee from the game as the outcome of their hard work is not worth the effort.

Mapmakers should be able to ban people from their maps for whatever reason they want. If the mapmaker is truly abusing his power on banning people, the market will take its course, and the map will not be played as often as there are either too many bans or people do not think highly of the mapmaker. It is not like the maps made are the only ones available, all of them are easily substituted with another map of similar value. If you really think your ban was unjustified, go play another, similar map. The people bitching about being banned from Martell's map can easily go to Tempted's map. If they are banned from both, then my assumption would be that they truly deserved it.

Also, my map is my work and my property. Forcing me to allow people to use my map who I don't want is forcing me to work hard on creating these maps for certain people who I did not voluntarily agree to work for or suffer consequences, which is essentially slavery. You cannot force me to allow people to use my property.

Mapmakers, it's time to stand up for yourselves.

[EDITED BY CTHULHU]: Martell's thread has been deleted by Martell
19.01.2015 - 09:29
Napisano od clovis1122, 19.01.2015 at 09:28

Napisano od Quantum027, 19.01.2015 at 09:26

so i make a map and the rule is that you cant talk bad about my map or my skills, its a map rule, is it allowed to ban a person who disrespects my map? according to mods it is


Srry you are not going into relevance!

I've posted the idea in the other post first than u.GG no re



what are you talking about?
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 09:30
Napisano od Quantum027, 19.01.2015 at 09:26

Napisano od Milton Friedman, 19.01.2015 at 08:59

Napisano od Goblin, 19.01.2015 at 08:53

Napisano od Milton Friedman, 19.01.2015 at 08:40

http://prntscr.com/5ue2xi

> showing me that poor made rule that isnt actually giving map makers the reasons on what is considered offence on which they can ban someone
> rules made so they can be interpreted widely by does who enforce them




I hope this makes it clearer for you.

Offenses:

Leaving early
Breaking map rules

Mapmakers can't ban:

For personal reasons
For breaking rules not listed on map

Also players are innocent until proven guilty.

And it doesn't matter if you think the rules are bad, the moderators are allowed to set rules.
So you either follow them or quit.

so i make a map and the rule is that you cant talk bad about my map or my skills, its a map rule, is it allowed to ban a person who disrespects my map? according to mods it is


You will have to ask the mods, as it is their job to interpret the rules and enforce them as they think is best for the game.
----
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 09:35
Napisano od Milton Friedman, 19.01.2015 at 09:30

Napisano od Quantum027, 19.01.2015 at 09:26

Napisano od Milton Friedman, 19.01.2015 at 08:59

Napisano od Goblin, 19.01.2015 at 08:53

Napisano od Milton Friedman, 19.01.2015 at 08:40

http://prntscr.com/5ue2xi

> showing me that poor made rule that isnt actually giving map makers the reasons on what is considered offence on which they can ban someone
> rules made so they can be interpreted widely by does who enforce them




I hope this makes it clearer for you.

Offenses:

Leaving early
Breaking map rules

Mapmakers can't ban:

For personal reasons
For breaking rules not listed on map

Also players are innocent until proven guilty.

And it doesn't matter if you think the rules are bad, the moderators are allowed to set rules.
So you either follow them or quit.

so i make a map and the rule is that you cant talk bad about my map or my skills, its a map rule, is it allowed to ban a person who disrespects my map? according to mods it is


You will have to ask the mods, as it is their job to interpret the rules and enforce them as they think is best for the game.

no no no no no, you can not say that atwar runs on a good government where the mods make the rules, then interpret the rules then execute the rules, if mods do not make the rules clear they can not interpret it to their advantage, since they have total control over the rules they should just simply make clear statements and not leave it for interpretation because I will find any loophole they leave
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 09:41
Napisano od Milton Friedman, 19.01.2015 at 09:26

No, you can't ban from maps for personal reasons, but you are free to ban people from your games, or gtfo of atWar since you agreed to follow the rules of atWar when you signed up. Doesn't matter if you like it or not, but one of the rules are that you can't ban for personal reasons.

Define me a personal reason?

Me being an asshole is not justifiable ...but if someone tells me "fuck off you retarded piece of fuckin shit i hope your mother dies from fuckin cancer you fuckin idiot!!!!!"

I ...have to let this person, play on the fruits of my hard work? Who gave this person rights to insult me and enjoy my work?


I want that in the rules aswell, rules that mods didnt give, but insulted everyone with pathetic 23. that they made ...when Columna said they are working on rules i thougth they will give us rules too follow.

What we got is: "fuck you, we made a rule that give us the ability to decide what the rule is". ...and first sentence "map makers can ban anyone bla bla ..." should make it fine.

Dont make me laugh.
----
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 09:47
Napisano od Goblin, 19.01.2015 at 09:41

Napisano od Milton Friedman, 19.01.2015 at 09:26

No, you can't ban from maps for personal reasons, but you are free to ban people from your games, or gtfo of atWar since you agreed to follow the rules of atWar when you signed up. Doesn't matter if you like it or not, but one of the rules are that you can't ban for personal reasons.

Define me a personal reason?

Me being an asshole is not justifiable ...but if someone tells me "fuck off you retarded piece of fuckin shit i hope your mother dies from fuckin cancer you fuckin idiot!!!!!"

I ...have to let this person, play on the fruits of my hard work? Who gave this person rights to insult me and enjoy my work?


I want that in the rules aswell, rules that mods didnt give, but insulted everyone with pathetic 23. that they made ...when Columna said they are working on rules i thougth they will give us rules too follow.

What we got is: "fuck you, we made a rule that give us the ability to decide what the rule is". ...and first sentence "map makers can ban anyone bla bla ..." should make it fine.

Dont make me laugh.

Goblin is still right. Why could I not get the strike to say this, smh this is why things like the Senate and these strikes fail, people arent as smart as Goblin and instead are retarded.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 09:54
Napisano od Goblin, 19.01.2015 at 09:41

I ...have to let this person, play on the fruits of my hard work? Who gave this person rights to insult me and enjoy my work?


You did when you decided to publish the map

btw, if he insults you, screenshot & send to the mods, yadda yadda yadda
----
Napisano od Mahdi, 23.11.2013 at 20:30

I don't consider the phrase "massive fag" to be an insult. Mods did.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 10:20
Napisano od notserral, 19.01.2015 at 09:54

btw, if he insults you, screenshot & send to the mods, yadda yadda yadda

Thats what i want ...screenshot it send it too mods and to be allowed to ban this person from playing on my map. Deal.

Give us rules for bans ...dont give us crap 23. guideline.

And i certanly didnt give anyone right to insult me pulse.
----
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 10:33
Napisano od Goblin, 19.01.2015 at 10:20

And i certanly didnt give anyone right to insult me pulse.


yep, but you still can't ban someone from your maps because they insulted you
----
Napisano od Mahdi, 23.11.2013 at 20:30

I don't consider the phrase "massive fag" to be an insult. Mods did.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 10:36
Napisano od Quantum027, 19.01.2015 at 08:47

last time i talked to admins about an issue with mods, ivan told me to leave the mods alone and let them do work without player interference, safe to say admins do not give a shit

Ofc, if the issue you're talking about is non-sense, as admin I'd ask you to gtfo politely. If we're talking about mods not doing their job properly and having provided solid evidence, then admins would take your words seriously. If it were true that mods were biased, you would have done plenty more than you've been doing untill now about it, and you would have proofs as well. Each time that you guys talk I seem to have clearer that you've got the "power" flu. Anyhow, the only persons to give you such power are admins and as far as I see... they dont give a shit about you. They must have their reasons for sure though...
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.

Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 10:45
Napisano od notserral, 19.01.2015 at 10:33

Napisano od Goblin, 19.01.2015 at 10:20

And i certanly didnt give anyone right to insult me pulse.


yep, but you still can't ban someone from your maps because they insulted you

Oh, and why is that ...give me an explanation, a good one?

and still no answer on why rule 23. is so lamely made.
----
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 10:47
Napisano od notserral, 19.01.2015 at 10:33

Napisano od Goblin, 19.01.2015 at 10:20

And i certanly didnt give anyone right to insult me pulse.


yep, but you still can't ban someone from your maps because they insulted you

What if he joined your map just to insult that map and yourself? Wouldn't that be a fair enough ban? He's actually affecting the game in a negative way and being disrespectful on purpose against the map maker.
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.

Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 10:49
You can hire 50% of map makers to kill the other 50%
Call in the union busters, let there be no concessions
Map makers should be so lucky to work for our grand society

you guys kinda fucked up the game I honestly hope you get less power
----
Napisano od Amok, 31.08.2012 at 03:10
Fruit's theory is correct
Napisano od tophat, 30.08.2012 at 21:04
Fruit is right

Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 10:55
Napisano od Goblin, 19.01.2015 at 10:45

Napisano od notserral, 19.01.2015 at 10:33

yep, but you still can't ban someone from your maps because they insulted you

Oh, and why is that ...give me an explanation, a good one?

and still no answer on why rule 23. is so lamely made.


quoting rule 23

Citat:
23.The mapmakers have the privilege to ban a player from playing on their map/scenario for breaking map/scenario rule's or leaving early in games that could potentially jeopardize the development of a game on their map/scenario; however, the mapmakers are not allowed to ban a player on a map/scenario for personal reasons or reasons not listed. The mapmakers must provide proof, because players are assumed innocent until proven guilty. Any player can ban a player from joining the games they host for any reason.

Simplified:
- Players may ban other players from games they host for any reason.
- Map makers, when called upon, must justify the act of banning players from playing their maps/scenarios by including information/screen shots in the "Comments" spot on their ban lists.


If you are insulted, that's an offense and you should screenshot it and report it to the mods.

IMO this whole problem would be averted if there were Terms of Service to be accepted when publishing a map. The consensus with user created content on games is that the content's rights are usually given to the game when the content is published. The banlist rules were made on the basis that the map you create, once published, ceases to be yours and becomes AW's content, therefore we should seek that the playerbase has access to it.

If it were up to me, banlists wouldn't even exist or in a very limited manner (i.e. banning people from games you host).
----
Napisano od Mahdi, 23.11.2013 at 20:30

I don't consider the phrase "massive fag" to be an insult. Mods did.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 10:57
Napisano od RaulPB, 19.01.2015 at 10:47

What if he joined your map just to insult that map and yourself? Wouldn't that be a fair enough ban? He's actually affecting the game in a negative way and being disrespectful on purpose against the map maker.


That's a perfectly good reason for adding the player to your personal ban list, screen shot the insult and report to the mods.
----
Napisano od Mahdi, 23.11.2013 at 20:30

I don't consider the phrase "massive fag" to be an insult. Mods did.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 11:11
Napisano od notserral, 19.01.2015 at 10:55

quoting rule 23

Why would you respond to me by quoting a rule i called bullshit.

And terms and conditions you mention is something i said somewhere ...well at the start of this debate.

And i also said ...you cant retroactively make me sign terms and conditions now.
----
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 11:19
Napisano od Goblin, 19.01.2015 at 11:11
And i also said ...you cant retroactively make me sign terms and conditions now.


You'd be able to remove your maps from the game if you don't agree with the changes. I'm not saying they'll come, but it's something that would be useful. Remember: ban list is not a right it's a privilege.

How can you possibly not understand rule #23 though. It's simple: you can't ban someone from your maps for personal reasons or if you don't supply a reason. That's it. That's all there is to it.
----
Napisano od Mahdi, 23.11.2013 at 20:30

I don't consider the phrase "massive fag" to be an insult. Mods did.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 11:22
Napisano od notserral, 19.01.2015 at 11:19

How can you possibly not understand rule #23 though. It's simple: you can't ban someone from your maps for personal reasons or if you don't supply a reason. That's it. That's all there is to it.

What reason? where did you give us a list of justifiable reasons? ...what is it you dont understand?

I dont want you to tell me and decide what does reasons might be ...i want an exact rule that i can follow on.

And define me a personal reason? ...see, your rules are so wide and open for looking at them as anyone see fit that we can discuss over and over whenever a new shit comes up or a new appeal.
----
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 11:29
Napisano od notserral, 19.01.2015 at 10:55

IMO this whole problem would be averted if there were Terms of Service to be accepted when publishing a map. The consensus with user created content on games is that the content's rights are usually given to the game when the content is published. The banlist rules were made on the basis that the map you create, once published, ceases to be yours and becomes AW's content, therefore we should seek that the playerbase has access to it.

If it were up to me, banlists wouldn't even exist or in a very limited manner (i.e. banning people from games you host).


this ^^. I have never encountered a game before where published player created content belonged to the player. Not to the extent where finding their content is popular they can withdraw it and make demands.

A terms of service as described should be introduced, itll ruffle some feathers initially and might cause some maps to get pulled down in rage. However over the long run it would prevent a lot of drama.
----
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 11:33
Napisano od Permamuted, 19.01.2015 at 11:29

Napisano od notserral, 19.01.2015 at 10:55

IMO this whole problem would be averted if there were Terms of Service to be accepted when publishing a map. The consensus with user created content on games is that the content's rights are usually given to the game when the content is published. The banlist rules were made on the basis that the map you create, once published, ceases to be yours and becomes AW's content, therefore we should seek that the playerbase has access to it.

If it were up to me, banlists wouldn't even exist or in a very limited manner (i.e. banning people from games you host).


this ^^. I have never encountered a game before where published player created content belonged to the player. Not to the extent where finding their content is popular they can withdraw it and make demands.

A terms of service as described should be introduced, itll ruffle some feathers initially and might cause some maps to get pulled down in rage. However over the long run it would prevent a lot of drama.


So you had never played a mod before? or a game with servers? Fuck, in Battlefield you can get permabanned from a server by having a good K/D ratio.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 11:38
 KYBL
Napisano od Permamuted, 19.01.2015 at 11:29

Napisano od notserral, 19.01.2015 at 10:55

IMO this whole problem would be averted if there were Terms of Service to be accepted when publishing a map. The consensus with user created content on games is that the content's rights are usually given to the game when the content is published. The banlist rules were made on the basis that the map you create, once published, ceases to be yours and becomes AW's content, therefore we should seek that the playerbase has access to it.

If it were up to me, banlists wouldn't even exist or in a very limited manner (i.e. banning people from games you host).


this ^^. I have never encountered a game before where published player created content belonged to the player. Not to the extent where finding their content is popular they can withdraw it and make demands.

A terms of service as described should be introduced, itll ruffle some feathers initially and might cause some maps to get pulled down in rage. However over the long run it would prevent a lot of drama.

I'm not making any maps if they aren't my property.
----

Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 11:41
Napisano od KYBL, 19.01.2015 at 11:38

I'm not making any maps if they aren't my property.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 11:44
Napisano od Tundy, 19.01.2015 at 11:41

Napisano od KYBL, 19.01.2015 at 11:38

I'm not making any maps if they aren't my property.



lewl
----
Napisano od Mahdi, 23.11.2013 at 20:30

I don't consider the phrase "massive fag" to be an insult. Mods did.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 12:04
Napisano od Tundy, 19.01.2015 at 11:33

So you had never played a mod before? or a game with servers? Fuck, in Battlefield you can get permabanned from a server by having a good K/D ratio.


youd be surprised. I played age of empires before, there custom maps were editable by anyone. Someone could publish a new scenario and theyd get credited with it but if they took it down someone else would simply republish it. As it were many versions of the same map would appear if it gained popularity.

On evony which i used to play and i know skitz plays, the terms of service you accepted when you made an account made it so anything you bought with your own real money belonged to the company. Legally you had very little rights if anything happened to the goods/services you were buying. And people were dropping several thousand dollars/euros on that game, so much so that a blackmarket developed and still thrives within the game.

You guys have it so good here, and here you are demanding more rights, rights which are being and will be abused. I believe you have good intentions tunder, but many of the other mapmakers, like adog for example, i do not.

Napisano od Goblin, 19.01.2015 at 11:35

Make me sign does terms and service ...new premium players, go ahead, but im not obliged to sign anything.

And shit like this you guys say its what makes map makers angry ...no respect for their work.


nobody is disrespecting the mapmakers. I have great respect for the works of tiktok, tunder and a handful of others. You can see the time and effort put into making their maps. Anyone with any comprehension of how the mapmaking process on aw works couldnt not respect them. The maps are accredited in their name, that should be enough.

However the ability to make a good/popular map shouldnt give a player the rights to strongarm the admins and the mods to acquiesce to their wishes. Its gonna cause problems, someone of questionable character throwing their weight around because they control the distribution of a popular map.

i know my opinion will be an unpopular one but just putting it out there.
----
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 12:08
Napisano od Permamuted, 19.01.2015 at 12:04

nobody is disrespecting the mapmakers. I have great respect for the works of tiktok, tunder and a handful of others. You can see the time and effort put into making their maps. Anyone with any comprehension of how the mapmaking process on aw works couldnt not respect them. The maps are accredited in their name, that should be enough.

However the ability to make a good/popular map shouldnt give a player the rights to strongarm the admins and the mods to acquiesce to their wishes. Its gonna cause problems, someone of questionable character throwing their weight around because they control the distribution of a popular map.

i know my opinion will be an unpopular one but just putting it out there.


Agreed. The problem with maps are that the mapmakers are themselves trolls and ban people for the most stupid of reasons.
----
Napisano od Mahdi, 23.11.2013 at 20:30

I don't consider the phrase "massive fag" to be an insult. Mods did.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 12:28
Im seriously geting pissed about mods not answering me on why it took them few days to come up with pathetic rule instead of making it clear without the need for anyone to question anything. Bad job.

And no answer to me on why should i be forced to allow someone who bashes my map to play on it (nothing personal, just business).

And i have to say, people who cry to be unbaned from a map they bashed or map maker they insulted are pathetic ...i would be ashamed if i played on a map of a person i insulted.
----
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 12:32
Napisano od Goblin, 19.01.2015 at 12:28
And no answer to me on why should i be forced to allow someone who bashes my map to play on it (nothing personal, just business).


Citat:
The consensus with user created content on games is that the content's rights are usually given to the game when the content is published. The banlist rules were made on the basis that the map you create, once published, ceases to be yours and becomes AW's content, therefore we should seek that the playerbase has access to it.
----
Napisano od Mahdi, 23.11.2013 at 20:30

I don't consider the phrase "massive fag" to be an insult. Mods did.
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 12:33
Rankist Sharck
Račun izbrisan
Napisano od Permamuted, 19.01.2015 at 12:04

Napisano od Tundy, 19.01.2015 at 11:33

So you had never played a mod before? or a game with servers? Fuck, in Battlefield you can get permabanned from a server by having a good K/D ratio.


youd be surprised. I played age of empires before, there custom maps were editable by anyone. Someone could publish a new scenario and theyd get credited with it but if they took it down someone else would simply republish it. As it were many versions of the same map would appear if it gained popularity.

On evony which i used to play and i know skitz plays, the terms of service you accepted when you made an account made it so anything you bought with your own real money belonged to the company. Legally you had very little rights if anything happened to the goods/services you were buying. And people were dropping several thousand dollars/euros on that game, so much so that a blackmarket developed and still thrives within the game.

You guys have it so good here, and here you are demanding more rights, rights which are being and will be abused. I believe you have good intentions tunder, but many of the other mapmakers, like adog for example, i do not.

Napisano od Goblin, 19.01.2015 at 11:35

Make me sign does terms and service ...new premium players, go ahead, but im not obliged to sign anything.

And shit like this you guys say its what makes map makers angry ...no respect for their work.


nobody is disrespecting the mapmakers. I have great respect for the works of tiktok, tunder and a handful of others. You can see the time and effort put into making their maps. Anyone with any comprehension of how the mapmaking process on aw works couldnt not respect them. The maps are accredited in their name, that should be enough.

However the ability to make a good/popular map shouldnt give a player the rights to strongarm the admins and the mods to acquiesce to their wishes. Its gonna cause problems, someone of questionable character throwing their weight around because they control the distribution of a popular map.

i know my opinion will be an unpopular one but just putting it out there.
TBF, Adog isn't part of the strike
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 12:36
Quote ...from who? Written by who and when? ...do you think im an idiot Pulse?
----
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 12:36
Napisano od Tundy, 19.01.2015 at 12:27

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.


thats a bit dramatic... I supported the previous mapmakers strike, it was well intentioned and demanded an issue that needed adressing be noticed. However what you guys seek now is the ability to ban players on your own personal whims.

for example

"i dont like this guy cause hes asian, banned"

"i dont like this guy cause hes friends with an asian, banned"

While you or goblin may not pull this kind of thing, others will.
----
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
19.01.2015 - 12:38
Napisano od Guest, 19.01.2015 at 12:33

TBF, Adog isn't part of the strike


Perhaps, but i mentioned him specifically because of the forum threads he made after the original strike when it was announced a banlist would be implemented.
----
Učitavanje...
Učitavanje...
atWar

About Us
Contact

Privatnost | Uslovi korištenja | Baneri | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

Pridružite nam se

Proširi riječ