30 max players

Napisano od Black Vortex, 25.07.2016 at 11:14

Napisano od Htin, 22.07.2016 at 17:56

Napisano od Mister Mister, 22.07.2016 at 14:13

Atwar would definatly need to do something about the servers before this happens.

The sever is alright we need more

We don't need 30 player maximum games, before we even go into bringing that up we need more players in general. When you can't even fill up a 6 player game(excluding 3v3s) in atwar nowadays then you know there's an issue.

easy. stop the sp multiplier= more players
or play casual games

If there will be increasing, why stop at 30, make it 50!

Admins should totally consider this... It would be great for scenario players as well as for the rest, imagine 30 player world game 5k/10k at peak hours...

Petition to eliminate player caps. scenario makers absolutely need infinite players.

Done

I ask, Admins deliver.

We had a 60 player game today that was fucking fun as fuck!! we all thought would crash for sure hell no it loaded.. the lag was kinda bad and at the beginning if you clicked player list it would freeze up .. Allso we found out that when you run out of colors the default color is red lol we had like 40 ppl in red it was really fun though..

Napisano od Eagle, 31.07.2016 at 07:49

It would be great for scenario players

>Aetius and Pyrrhus are struggling to keep their maps' player number around 10 because we can't fill anything else

Napisano od Zephyrusu, 01.08.2016 at 16:58

Napisano od Eagle, 31.07.2016 at 07:49

It would be great for scenario players

>Aetius and Pyrrhus are struggling to keep their maps' player number around 10 because we can't fill anything else

thats nice, it means that scenario community is dying

Napisano od Oleg, 05.08.2016 at 05:30

Napisano od Zephyrusu, 01.08.2016 at 16:58

Napisano od Eagle, 31.07.2016 at 07:49

It would be great for scenario players

>Aetius and Pyrrhus are struggling to keep their maps' player number around 10 because we can't fill anything else

thats nice, it means that scenario community is dying

Not really, it's just that they all play WW1

Napisano od Zephyrusu, 05.08.2016 at 05:35

Napisano od Oleg, 05.08.2016 at 05:30

Napisano od Zephyrusu, 01.08.2016 at 16:58

Napisano od Eagle, 31.07.2016 at 07:49

It would be great for scenario players

>Aetius and Pyrrhus are struggling to keep their maps' player number around 10 because we can't fill anything else

thats nice, it means that scenario community is dying

Not really, it's just that they all play WW1

not true, same 20 players are playing ww1 for whole day just making pauses.

Napisano od Oleg, 05.08.2016 at 05:45

Napisano od Zephyrusu, 05.08.2016 at 05:35

Napisano od Oleg, 05.08.2016 at 05:30

Napisano od Zephyrusu, 01.08.2016 at 16:58

Napisano od Eagle, 31.07.2016 at 07:49

It would be great for scenario players

>Aetius and Pyrrhus are struggling to keep their maps' player number around 10 because we can't fill anything else

thats nice, it means that scenario community is dying

Not really, it's just that they all play WW1

not true, same 20 players are playing ww1 for whole day just making pauses.

I've seen 3 full WW1 games on at the same time, not even joking

Napisano od Zephyrusu, 05.08.2016 at 05:46

Napisano od Oleg, 05.08.2016 at 05:45

Napisano od Zephyrusu, 05.08.2016 at 05:35

Napisano od Oleg, 05.08.2016 at 05:30

Napisano od Zephyrusu, 01.08.2016 at 16:58

Napisano od Eagle, 31.07.2016 at 07:49

It would be great for scenario players

>Aetius and Pyrrhus are struggling to keep their maps' player number around 10 because we can't fill anything else

thats nice, it means that scenario community is dying

Not really, it's just that they all play WW1

not true, same 20 players are playing ww1 for whole day just making pauses.

I've seen 3 full WW1 games on at the same time, not even joking

4 in each game were same players, gg.