Revamping Relentless Attack

Napisano od Azula., 10.07.2015 at 05:02

Make a poll and lets see what the community wants to nerf.

Napisano od Goblin, 10.07.2015 at 07:12

Napisano od Azula., 10.07.2015 at 05:02

Make a poll and lets see what the community wants to nerf.

Remove -10 cost for tanks in all strategies... its cost is ridiculous compared to bombers and helicopters.

Napisano od Goblin, 10.07.2015 at 07:12

Napisano od Azula., 10.07.2015 at 05:02

Make a poll and lets see what the community wants to nerf.

Remove -10 cost for tanks in all strategies... its cost is ridiculous compared to bombers and helicopters.

Napisano od minusSeven, 10.07.2015 at 10:37

No support. Sorry but I don't think ra is that OP.

Napisano od Waffel, 10.07.2015 at 11:28

I think the biggest problem is that the RA tanks cost 90, which is the same amount as IMP tanks. We all know RA nails IMP in any single way, no denying that. Especially since 90% of the RA players pick countries like ukraine/poland etc. Low cost countries with decent reinforcements. That combo is just heartbreaking. If you are saying RA isn't op right now, than thats probably on you, but the strategy RA compared to almost all strategies is straight out OP.

RA basically made GC as a strategy useless, while alot of people made threads about strategies that needed boosts which included GC. Well this is certainly not how to make it.
As for saying we should make a poll to see what the ''community'' wants. Will be 100% unfair. Especially the people who came with the idea about a poll etc, always knew a way to kind of scam that poll. They will most likely pr their clanmembers and probably random people just to vote ''RA is fine right now'' and then use that as ''voice of community''.
(spoken out of experience)

I think blitz should've never got boosted and nerfed after that at all. Same goes for RA right now, I think after RA gets boosted/nerfed (whatever floats your boat) you guys should stop changing every couple months the strategies and maybe look at the strategies which havent been changed for years.. like GC/LB/DS/ (HW new).

For those who say ''RA is fine right now, stop complaining'' are plain straight hypocrites. They are afraid of losing their strategy that gives them a slight advantage so skills aren't really needed. (directed to the players who play RA 24/7, bcs otherwise they cant win)

inb4 clovis quoting me with bullshit again

Napisano od Waffel, 10.07.2015 at 11:28

I think the biggest problem is that the RA tanks cost 90, which is the same amount as IMP tanks. We all know RA nails IMP in any single way, no denying that. Especially since 90% of the RA players pick countries like ukraine/poland etc. Low cost countries with decent reinforcements. That combo is just heartbreaking. If you are saying RA isn't op right now, than thats probably on you, but the strategy RA compared to almost all strategies is straight out OP.

RA basically made GC as a strategy useless, while alot of people made threads about strategies that needed boosts which included GC. Well this is certainly not how to make it.
As for saying we should make a poll to see what the ''community'' wants. Will be 100% unfair. Especially the people who came with the idea about a poll etc, always knew a way to kind of scam that poll. They will most likely pr their clanmembers and probably random people just to vote ''RA is fine right now'' and then use that as ''voice of community''.
(spoken out of experience)

I think blitz should've never got boosted and nerfed after that at all. Same goes for RA right now, I think after RA gets boosted/nerfed (whatever floats your boat) you guys should stop changing every couple months the strategies and maybe look at the strategies which havent been changed for years.. like GC/LB/DS/ (HW new).

For those who say ''RA is fine right now, stop complaining'' are plain straight hypocrites. They are afraid of losing their strategy that gives them a slight advantage so skills aren't really needed. (directed to the players who play RA 24/7, bcs otherwise they cant win)

inb4 clovis quoting me with bullshit again

Napisano od Permamuted, 10.07.2015 at 15:20

Napisano od Waffel, 10.07.2015 at 11:28

I think the biggest problem is that the RA tanks cost 90, which is the same amount as IMP tanks. We all know RA nails IMP in any single way, no denying that. Especially since 90% of the RA players pick countries like ukraine/poland etc. Low cost countries with decent reinforcements. That combo is just heartbreaking. If you are saying RA isn't op right now, than thats probably on you, but the strategy RA compared to almost all strategies is straight out OP.

RA basically made GC as a strategy useless, while alot of people made threads about strategies that needed boosts which included GC. Well this is certainly not how to make it.
As for saying we should make a poll to see what the ''community'' wants. Will be 100% unfair. Especially the people who came with the idea about a poll etc, always knew a way to kind of scam that poll. They will most likely pr their clanmembers and probably random people just to vote ''RA is fine right now'' and then use that as ''voice of community''.
(spoken out of experience)

I think blitz should've never got boosted and nerfed after that at all. Same goes for RA right now, I think after RA gets boosted/nerfed (whatever floats your boat) you guys should stop changing every couple months the strategies and maybe look at the strategies which havent been changed for years.. like GC/LB/DS/ (HW new).

For those who say ''RA is fine right now, stop complaining'' are plain straight hypocrites. They are afraid of losing their strategy that gives them a slight advantage so skills aren't really needed. (directed to the players who play RA 24/7, bcs otherwise they cant win)

inb4 clovis quoting me with bullshit again

you do realise gc has been boosted twice this past year. It is actually good now, people havent yet realised.

Napisano od Guest, 10.07.2015 at 20:52

#2: You can all debate about 8 attack or 9 attack. But tanks could get a crit boost, and the collateral of tanks increased or something. That way, when tanks capture cities, it will be harder to add more tanks to your army (it also makes the person fighting ra weaker since they capture the weak cities but :/ i'm not an expert on this stuff, just giving an possibility)

Napisano od Permamuted, 10.07.2015 at 15:20

Napisano od Waffel, 10.07.2015 at 11:28

I think the biggest problem is that the RA tanks cost 90, which is the same amount as IMP tanks. We all know RA nails IMP in any single way, no denying that. Especially since 90% of the RA players pick countries like ukraine/poland etc. Low cost countries with decent reinforcements. That combo is just heartbreaking. If you are saying RA isn't op right now, than thats probably on you, but the strategy RA compared to almost all strategies is straight out OP.

RA basically made GC as a strategy useless, while alot of people made threads about strategies that needed boosts which included GC. Well this is certainly not how to make it.
As for saying we should make a poll to see what the ''community'' wants. Will be 100% unfair. Especially the people who came with the idea about a poll etc, always knew a way to kind of scam that poll. They will most likely pr their clanmembers and probably random people just to vote ''RA is fine right now'' and then use that as ''voice of community''.
(spoken out of experience)

I think blitz should've never got boosted and nerfed after that at all. Same goes for RA right now, I think after RA gets boosted/nerfed (whatever floats your boat) you guys should stop changing every couple months the strategies and maybe look at the strategies which havent been changed for years.. like GC/LB/DS/ (HW new).

For those who say ''RA is fine right now, stop complaining'' are plain straight hypocrites. They are afraid of losing their strategy that gives them a slight advantage so skills aren't really needed. (directed to the players who play RA 24/7, bcs otherwise they cant win)

inb4 clovis quoting me with bullshit again

you do realise gc has been boosted twice this past year. It is actually good now, people havent yet realised.

Napisano od Waffel, 10.07.2015 at 17:01

Napisano od Permamuted, 10.07.2015 at 15:20

Napisano od Waffel, 10.07.2015 at 11:28

you do realise gc has been boosted twice this past year. It is actually good now, people havent yet realised.

Boosted? What exactly? It is not noticeable at all.
There should be really a forum just for only this... http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=19042

I agree with waffel

Napisano od Guest, 11.07.2015 at 15:40

Imp is also useless against RA in duels. I can guarantee players with similar levels of playing, with one playing imp and another RA, that RA will be best of the two - in my experience at least.

RA can slow roll (but really just spam tanks, ahem), easy recap when capped, and just dulls the gameplay because even when imp has higher rein 10 tanks can take ~20 inf if not more. And this is not considering that it is only imp Turk with very high rein: other countries like imp Italy or imp germ is useless because it can't even produce as much as turk

Napisano od clovis1122, 11.07.2015 at 17:44

But when I was playing Don as RA poland, I had all balkans, benelux, scandinavia, but he hold all my wave of tanks until I eventually had no reinf and he capped me...

Napisano od Goblin, 11.07.2015 at 14:10

Just played RA with France, yesterday i played with Germany, day before with UK...
And its fucking hilarious how overpowered it is even with this high cost countries, so you all can stop with your bullshit about it "being fine"... i understand people like to believe its them who are actually raping with their skills, but get real.

Remove both cost boosts for RA tanks... their cost is ridiculous.

EDIT: forgot to say... let's all remember why the boost was made in the first place?

It wasn't made because RA was a weak strategy... it was solely made because it wasn't played much in "competitive games" and tanks were not used as much as infantry.
That was a wrong reason to boost a strategy that was viable and strong on so many different settings.

Napisano od America., 11.07.2015 at 22:05

RA weaker then lots of strats no support

Napisano od Htin, 11.07.2015 at 21:49

it's either they were noob or you was pro

Napisano od Azula., 12.07.2015 at 04:22

Napisano od America., 11.07.2015 at 22:05

RA weaker then lots of strats no support

Napisano od The Tactician, 12.07.2015 at 05:35

Napisano od Azula., 12.07.2015 at 04:22

Napisano od America., 11.07.2015 at 22:05

RA weaker then lots of strats no support

How about instead of posting useless comments and make it seem like a lot of people don't support this revamp (which a lot don't, but just because they can't play anything else [I should say a lot of skilled people, perhaps] ) you give explanations and reasons as to why RA is 'weaker' than lots of strats...

Napisano od The Tactician, 12.07.2015 at 05:35

How about instead of posting useless comments and make it seem like a lot of people don't support this revamp (which a lot don't, but just because they can't play anything else [I should say a lot of skilled people, perhaps] ) you give explanations and reasons as to why RA is 'weaker' than lots of strats...