Strategies

Napisano od Lord G, 03.04.2011 at 08:39

Would it be possible to give each strategy a 'unique' unit, or be able to build specific rare units...

say,
Heavy tank = tank commander
Light tank = blitzkrieg
partisan = guerilla warfare
anti tank infantry for perfect defense


You get the idea.

Napisano od DeathPox, 11.05.2013 at 21:42

I was thinking of a strategy that was...very different from how strategies have been ran.

Strategy: Eavesdrop
You can see what everyone is saying in private message and ally chat.

The down sides? Well, not sure yet. Any suggestions for those?

Napisano od GOD 2.0, 08.05.2013 at 09:20

There should be a strategy that's makes air and naval powerful but land units are weak, air units cant be more powerful then SM and naval cant be more powerful than NC

also this strategy
-4 hp for all units but -30 cost and +2 range for all units and every time u buy a unit u get a extra 2 free units. EX:u press the button to buy a bomber u get 3

Napisano od Guest, 12.08.2013 at 19:09

Napisano od EpicRice, 28.05.2013 at 23:15

I was watching the movie Downfall/Der Untergang recently and I was wondering if we could have a scorched earth tactic, maybe more collateral population/economic damage to cities the enemy takes from us and/or more damage to cities we take from the enemy? Just an idea that I think would be interesting, the point would be to give the enemy less resources to use against you, at the cost of it backfiring on you too.

I like this

attack units +4-6 collateral

+1 attack +20 cost

Napisano od Selow, 10.04.2013 at 11:49

I like the original idea that was posted. I give it my support.

I also know that many people here were considering a stealth detection strat, which I also think is good.

I'd say at least (obviously there will be more detail to it than just this):

+Side
-110 cost for Sentries
+4 to all types of detection/ranges for Sentries
+2 detection/ranges for all primarily defensive units (Militia, Inf, Anti-Air, and anything else which USUALLY has a higher def than att)
-10 cost to all defensive units
+5 detection/ranges to General
+1 def to all units against attacking stealth units (while enemy units remain in stealth- as such unhidden stealth bombers will not suffer after the first attack

-Side
+15 cost for all primarily offensive units (this way they can cost more initially, but maintenance may only go up by 1 XD)
-1 movement for tanks, bombers, and other primarily offensive units
-3 movement for all stealth units (with the exception of Sentries)
+20 cost for all stealth units (except for Sentries)

Oh, and maybe something about battleships being turned into defensive units, to counter subs?

Napisano od Tundy, 11.05.2013 at 22:24

Napisano od DeathPox, 11.05.2013 at 21:42

I was thinking of a strategy that was...very different from how strategies have been ran.

Strategy: Eavesdrop
You can see what everyone is saying in private message and ally chat.

The down sides? Well, not sure yet. Any suggestions for those?

Strategy: Eavesdrop
You can see what everyone is saying in ally chat.

Down sides: All units will 0 Critical, and -4 view Range.

Napisano od Klabauter, 13.10.2013 at 06:03

I too think that Relentless Attack should get improved, or at least it should get made more interesting. Same goes for strategies like Great Combinator for example.
I really would like to have a strat with strong tanks, but like said, RA is just... boring... since it barely affects anything compared to other strats.

Suggestions for Relentless Attack:

+2 HP for Panzer

-1 Range for Infantry

+1 Attack for Destroyers

-1 Defence for Militia

+2 Attack for Bombers

-1 Defence for Anti-aircraft

Anti-aircraft cost +20

This would make it definitely more interesting and would still fit in the strat theme.

Other points:

Perfect Defence should have an Anti-aircraft bonus

the Stealth Detection Strategy idea pretty good, especially since MoS is pretty overpowered

make Hybrid Warfare somehow better please, thx.

Napisano od Xenosapien, 13.10.2013 at 07:47

If these are in addition to how it is normally then I agree with RA points

Napisano od Xenosapien, 13.10.2013 at 07:47

PD SHOULD NOT HAVE ANY MORE BONUSES, THE BONUS AGAINST TANKS IS OP AS IT IS.

Napisano od Xenosapien, 13.10.2013 at 07:47

Stealth detection strat is useless, only able to use against stealth and would be weak against everything else.

Napisano od Klabauter, 13.10.2013 at 10:38

Napisano od Xenosapien, 13.10.2013 at 07:47

PD SHOULD NOT HAVE ANY MORE BONUSES, THE BONUS AGAINST TANKS IS OP AS IT IS.

But it would fit perfectly to the strategy theme and would give it more character. Of course, you also can make other units weaker for it. I thought about making Stealth planes or helicopters a bit weaker for it.

Napisano od Klabauter, 13.10.2013 at 10:38

Napisano od Xenosapien, 13.10.2013 at 07:47

Stealth detection strat is useless, only able to use against stealth and would be weak against everything else.

That's true, but I personally have the feeling that MoS is pretty overpowered and could need such a counter strategy.
I just think it would be an interesting strategy, and a good addition to the other "useless" ones. I for one, would use it from time to time, especially if I know a strong player in the room uses MoS a lot.

Citat:

Napisano od Klabauter, 13.10.2013 at 10:38

But it would fit perfectly to the strategy theme and would give it more character. Of course, you also can make other units weaker for it. I thought about making Stealth planes or helicopters a bit weaker for it.

No, that is nerfing units that aren't used very much at all, it is a negligible nerf.

Napisano od Xenosapien, 13.10.2013 at 07:47

Stealth detection strat is useless, only able to use against stealth and would be weak against everything else.

That's true, but I personally have the feeling that MoS is pretty overpowered and could need such a counter strategy. I just think it would be an interesting strategy, and a good addition to the other "useless" ones. I for one, would use it from time to time, especially if I know a strong player in the room uses MoS a lot.

Citat:

Napisano od EndsOfInvention, 13.10.2013 at 10:43

Napisano od Klabauter, 13.10.2013 at 10:38

Napisano od Xenosapien, 13.10.2013 at 07:47

PD SHOULD NOT HAVE ANY MORE BONUSES, THE BONUS AGAINST TANKS IS OP AS IT IS.

But it would fit perfectly to the strategy theme and would give it more character. Of course, you also can make other units weaker for it. I thought about making Stealth planes or helicopters a bit weaker for it.

You can make other units as bad as you like, but pd players only need infantry and transports if there's water between the infantry and where they can be op. You can make other units as bad as you like, but it will not stop those infantry.

Napisano od Xenosapien, 13.10.2013 at 07:47

Stealth detection strat is useless, only able to use against stealth and would be weak against everything else.

That's true, but I personally have the feeling that MoS is pretty overpowered and could need such a counter strategy.
I just think it would be an interesting strategy, and a good addition to the other "useless" ones. I for one, would use it from time to time, especially if I know a strong player in the room uses MoS a lot.

MoS is not op, and is generally regarded as fairly bad for everything except intercontinental warfare. It needs high cost and despite not really being bad in any area, doesn't excel anywhere either.

Napisano od EndsOfInvention, 13.10.2013 at 10:43

pd players only need infantry and transports

Napisano od EndsOfInvention, 13.10.2013 at 10:43

MoS is not op, and is generally regarded as fairly bad for everything except intercontinental warfare.

Citat:

Napisano od Klabauter, 13.10.2013 at 10:57

Napisano od EndsOfInvention, 13.10.2013 at 10:43

pd players only need infantry and transports

Well, then making Anti-aircraft a bit better, won't change their game a lot, anyway, if they only need Infantry. It would still make the strategy look more original, to me, though.

Do you even logic?

Napisano od EndsOfInvention, 13.10.2013 at 10:43

MoS is not op, and is generally regarded as fairly bad for everything except intercontinental warfare.

I know where it has its strengths, but MoS is also an alround strategy and can be used almost everywhere, plus it even has better planes than SM, for example (Stealth planes at least). And that it excels in high funds is not a problem, since most people here rather play 50k world games, anyway.

Napisano od Xenosapien, 13.10.2013 at 12:01

Do you even logic?

Napisano od Klabauter, 13.10.2013 at 12:04

Napisano od Xenosapien, 13.10.2013 at 12:01

Do you even logic?

If you wanna troll, go back to /b/ or whatever, dipshit.

Napisano od Klabauter, 13.10.2013 at 06:03

I too think that Relentless Attack should get improved, or at least it should get made more interesting. Same goes for strategies like Great Combinator for example.
I really would like to have a strat with strong tanks, but like said, RA is just... boring... since it barely affects anything compared to other strats.

Suggestions for Relentless Attack:

+2 HP for Panzer

-1 Range for Infantry

+1 Attack for Destroyers

-1 Defence for Militia

+2 Attack for Bombers

-1 Defence for Anti-aircraft

Anti-aircraft cost +20

This would make it definitely more interesting and would still fit in the strat theme.

Other points:

Perfect Defence should have an Anti-aircraft bonus

the Stealth Detection Strategy idea pretty good, especially since MoS is pretty overpowered

make Hybrid Warfare somehow better please, thx.

Napisano od Klabauter, 13.10.2013 at 12:04

Napisano od Xenosapien, 13.10.2013 at 12:01

Do you even logic?

If you wanna troll, go back to /b/ or whatever, dipshit.

Napisano od Mauzer Panteri, 10.12.2013 at 04:48

Nerf Blitz with :

- 1 attack for militia.

Napisano od Prey, 15.12.2013 at 09:27

Napisano od Klabauter, 13.10.2013 at 12:04

Napisano od Xenosapien, 13.10.2013 at 12:01

Do you even logic?

If you wanna troll, go back to /b/ or whatever, dipshit.

If that's trolling for you, then I guess you are a retard with no clue what you're talking about