Hate Peach

5/5 thread unlocking strong

I'm a man of my word.

Napisano od tophat, 15.04.2014 at 20:48

Religion is real, its concepts are not.

That makes no sense.

Napisano od tophat, 15.04.2014 at 20:48

Because not all of the Bible's content is fictional, have you read it? Or have you only watched Conspiracy documentaries, George Carlin, Bill Maher or memes saying religion and its construct is bullshit? You say it's bullshit, lies and fiction, where are the reasons?

Why would I waste my time trying to read a piece of bad fiction, when there are so many amazing books out there? I honestly tried, but I just couldn't stand the contradictions. I read one paragraph, then the next paragraph completely contradicted what the previous one said. Mindfucked, I threw it away. God is against killing, but he kills the entire planet. He is loving but he will send people in a jet-fuel firing hell for eternity. He is all-knowing, so he already knows what is going to happen in the future. So he already knows that Eve will take a bite out of the fruit, yet he tells her not to, in order to test her? Test what, exactly? HE ALREADY KNOWS that she will fail the test. Why is he doing this? Fun? Amusement? Or could it perhaps be, that all of this stuff is just a bunch of made-up, imaginary crap? He is all powerful so that means he has the power to do anything. "If the all powerful God controls Satan, he is an accomplice; and if he doesn't, he is not an all powerful God." He created galaxies, yet he can't give that child dying in africa a banana? How could a god like this possibly exist? Why would you worship this sick creature? If he was real, would you cower and submit under his threats and be indifferent about this stuff? Have you no heart?
If pointing out these things, and caring about the suffering of these people, and standing by what I see and feel means I'm going to be put in hell, well goddamn it, put me in fucking hell then. I will never worship you.

Napisano od tophat, 15.04.2014 at 20:48

The only one you gave was that man created it and religion, which is obviously true, we all know this.

If everyone knew this, you wouldn't hear one single complaint from me, ever. Clearly, most people have no idea about this.

Napisano od tophat, 15.04.2014 at 20:48

If you do believe the bible and religion are bullshit, lies and fiction, I'd like to see your opinion on a few notions, if you care to answer.
1) What is your opinion on the evolution of thought after the book of Jobs, in accordance to the chronology of the Holy Bible. Would you be willing to accept that the notion of retribution was broken? And do you think it still manifested itself in the following books of the Bible. If you haven't read the book of Jobs, I suggest you take at look it. Your views will improve, or you might just find it interesting, I'm not sure.

2) Do you think the Deuteronomy passages actually promote rape or do you think the pre-modern conception of people affected the laws imposed in this text?

3) Lastly, do you think the Bible was created initially with the purpose to control people? Or, do you think religion was created with the purpose to control people? Or, do you think they were both created with the right intention to teach the morality of the era, and the "purpose of control" was thus incidental because of man's egotistical beliefs and wanting of power?

Unlike religious people, I am not arrogant enough to claim that I know everything. I don't know what the book of Jobs is. I admit that I have no idea what you are talking about here, so I cannot answer. I don't have all the answers.
As for paragraph no. 3), I think it's both. It has been and still is, a mass control tool. I am mainly reffering to Christianity and Islam here. Back in time the church (priests) owned vast amounts of land while dozens of other people were crowded, each family, into some small shithole they called their home. Whenever one of them came up to the priest to ask "when will we have some of this land, we are so crowded". The answer was always: "You will have yours later/after". In the afterlife, of course.
Whoever came up first with this immediately rose to the top of the chain (kings and priests). The elites lied to the masses about the afterlife so they can keep all the good stuff.
As for morality, it most likely played a part in civilizing the population. But that's no longer necessary. You don't need religion to know it's bad to steal and kill. Your conscience and the law should be enough.

Napisano od tophat, 15.04.2014 at 20:48

You are right Unleashed that rights are, in essence, imaginary; [...]
You need to specify the rights you're talking about Unleashed.

Rights are not rights if they can be taken away. In another thread, I already gave the example of the 100.000 + Japanese American citizens being moved away and locked up "just because" in 1942. In 2012, a country in the European Union had a referendum which called for the firing of its current president who repeatedly did things that contradicted the constitution. 80% of the votes were for YES, kick him out of the office. After the State Secretary of the USA together with the ambassador, and some EU and German politicians expressed their disagreement toward this, a quick masquerade was made up which claimed that not enough percentage of the total population voted (which is ridiculous), and the vote was ignored. The rights, the WILL of that population, was thrown into trash. You have no rights. Your rights apply when it is convenient to those in power. The right to vote is an illusion. The outcome will be decided at a much higher level.

Napisano od tophat, 16.04.2014 at 10:29

You call others ignorant, when you are yourself. You're right that religion is fictional and can be bad forpeople. I agree as well, but PROVE IT.

What more proof do I need than my own experience and that of many others? The proof is all around us. Open your eyes. Threatening children with eternal hell is abusive. It is bad to have people living in fear of eternal hell for something natural like sexual thoughts. It is bad to teach people that god is looking out for them. They need to rely on themselves. No result is because of god. If you achieved something, YOU did it. It was you who did that amazing thing, not god.
It is bad to avoid the good that this life has to offer, just because you hope you'll have something better when you get to heaven. You will waste your life.

Napisano od tophat, 16.04.2014 at 10:29

You're not trying to convert anyone? So you're just being an ass hole on purpose? Look, when I discover a new notion, or a philosophical view or an approach or any political position that I find to be the truth or reality, I seek to teach people what I discovered, or perhaps learn from others. You do the opposite, you go off calling people idiots for their beliefs and that they're full of shit. No one will ever agree with you or accept that you're correct if you behave this way. But again, you said you're not looking to convert anyone, so you're just calling them idiots for the sole purpose of flaunting your so-called superiority.

Everyone in the forum is against you because you put them down, and because you're ignorant.

Excuse my allergy to immense stupidity. But I think trying to reason with some people is a waste of time. Insults is what they ask for when they display such gullibility, and WORSE, when they impose this shit on others. I do not impose. I am not threatening you. I am just pointing things out, and if they're painful, so be it. I will not censor myself to appease the hypocritical masses.

Napisano od Khal.eesi, 15.04.2014 at 10:02

No its actually not.Its government and not diversity.Black people developed a culture of ganglife in Usa because the government wanted it that way.They fed them with guns and drugs and isolated them from the rest.And dont get me started about rascist white cops and what they been doing to blacks for so many years.Only from the recorded videos that have leaked over the years you can see infuriating and disgusting injustice, done to these people.My point being,you reap what you saw..

As usual, my arguments aren't broken down. You merely deliver another emotional, buzzword driven rebuttal. Black crime exploded AFTER the civil rights movement. That is a key issue here. Black Abortion, Unemployment, Single Parent families were all very low before the 1960s. They rapidly increased post 1960s. So if it were a discriminatory state which created these issues, they would have existed before the 60s. They didn't. Black behavior has always verged in criminality compared to European culture. Look at the arab scholars of the Dark Ages and their views upon African peoples. They are identical. If Slavery and Racialist states caused these issues, why did they exist in 800-1400AD? Quoted by Arab Geographers and Scholars? Dominant White Culture had a very positive influence on Black Americans. It wasn't until that dominance ended in the 1960s when Black issues became a major concern.

I have explained this numerous times and all you have done is deny it. Look up Thomas Sowell, a Black Libertarian or Dr. William Pierce, a White Nationalist. Both share similar views on the causes of the current state of black society. Its not down to white policeman or a 'racist' state. Police treat most people in a similar manner, which is usually terrible. Racial profiling in crime makes perfect sense. Is there any point profiling old East Asian women? No. Their crime rates are rock bottom so there is no needed. Blacks commit most of the crime in the USA so they get most of the focus.

Napisano od Khal.eesi, 15.04.2014 at 10:02

Also i dont get how feminism destroyed the family structure.

I'm not explaining this. I have done it before in very long posts.

Napisano od Khal.eesi, 15.04.2014 at 10:02

But i can provide a positive argument for multiculturalism.How about the survival of human species?Because as long as nationalism is a thing, countries will go to war and eventually use nukes and eventually, we are gonna eradicate all life on this planet..

So you cant provide a single legitimate positive to Multiculturalism other than the unprovable fear of nuclear war? Do you really think that the world will ever reach that point of social cohesion? Firstly, Multiculturalism is ONLY enforced upon White European cultures. Nowhere else in the world is this enforce. NOWHERE. Why should Europeans sacrifice their territory and culture for this idea of a species which has no intention of committing to the same social unity? A social unity which is literally impossible.

I asked for a SINGLE positive argument for multiculturalism. Your only benefit was the prevention of nuclear war which you cant even guarantee. You cannot provide a single benefit so why do you support it? Nations, Borders and Tribes are not arbitrary. They are networks of similar genetic tribes that work in mutual interest built over thousands of years.

Napisano od Khal.eesi, 15.04.2014 at 10:02

p.s. you are blaming the wrong people, exactly the way golden dawn is doing.All your points and all your arguments, when broken down, are clearly a fault of the government and not the people.

I asserted no blame. You haven't explained how I am wrong and you haven't broken down any arguments. You cannot provide a single benefit to my tribe to take part in the social experiment of multicult which has been PROVEN to not work and only hurt communities.

http://www.amren.com/news/2014/01/the-downside-of-diversity/

The original source is a Harvard Liberal Sociologist study on the affects of Diversity. Everything I said and have said is full backed by this. You cannot provide a single benefit but I can provide a laundry list of negatives. You fully support a policy proven to be detrimental to European peoples with no realistic reason. I earlier posted economic and social reasoning. It was a very long post and noone dared quote it and break it down. Because you cant.

You are brainwashed.

Napisano od tophat, 15.04.2014 at 10:48

This. Tik tok i suggest you read this several times to learn your that arguments are false. The reason why in some countries multiculturalism doesn't work properly, leads to criminal activity, stealing of employment from the natives of the country etc, is because they are marginalized and are treated with either racism , neophobia or any other form of discrimination. Thus, social conflict arises, and all the issues that you argue FOR in your argument, arise as well.

I live in a very multicultural country, and although some issues occasionally arise, we treat newcomers fairly and we don't have racist or neophobic prejudices for the most part (some do of course). If you're an immigrant, and you're moving to another country, you're doing it for a better life, not to steal the jobs of the natives or ruin their political or social structure. lol THOSE issues are incidental

Painful to read. I couldnt type out a long post to this. It required vocal input.
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0xqywsl2K35

It's the tophat way of winning arguments. His posts paralyze you with the ignorance they contain to the point where you can't even bother to respond.

That, or locking threads up.

Napisano od Unleashed, 17.04.2014 at 11:07

It's the tophat way of winning arguments. His posts paralyze you with the ignorance they contain to the point where you can't even bother to respond.

That, or locking threads up.

No. You're the one who quoted religious people, while calling them idiots. You call the fathers of science idiots. Shut up please. You use AH in your arguments more than Windy on meth or Jesse back when he was on pot on Breaking Bad.

I made a mistake. I meant toptraps*

Napisano od Tik-Tok, 17.04.2014 at 10:52

Painful to read. I couldnt type out a long post to this. It required vocal input.
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0xqywsl2K35

>Dat Voice

On a serious note: I never actually saw multiculturalism in that light. Your closing comment, "...where you adapt to the foreigner, other than the foreigner adapting to you" is something I wholeheartedly agree with in every sense. Take a long drawn-out look at Sweden, for example; It's multiculturalism has failed immensely, and once it spills over into neighboring countries, it will be chaos.

Napisano od Tik-Tok, 17.04.2014 at 10:47

Black crime exploded AFTER the civil rights movement. That is a key issue here. Black Abortion, Unemployment, Single Parent families were all very low before the 1960s. They rapidly increased post 1960s. So if it were a discriminatory state which created these issues, they would have existed before the 60s. They didn't. Black behavior has always verged in criminality compared to European culture.

First of all dont ever put "abortion rate" as a point of relevance in any debate if you want to be taken seriously.I dont care about it and it doesnt serve any point whatsoever.lol.
Second do you know about the people you are talking about and the conditions of their life before the civil rights moovement?Black crime could not even exist before this moovement, because blacks were still semi-slaves, especially in the South.Conditions before civil rights moovement include racial segregation, disfranchisement, economic/employment exploitation and violence,abuse,intimidation. Crime rapidly increased (havent checked but i believe you), because they started to being treated like actual human beings maybe and human beings commit crimes.And even after the civil rights moovement and the laws that followed, blacks still faced discrimination on so many levels like housing,voting,education,employment and even violence.
So comparing whites and blacks in terms of criminality, without taking all these factors into account is unacceptable.We are talking about people who were murdered,exploited in every way and denied education, for hundreds of years.
Also the 13th,14th and 15th ammendmend dont mean shit in reality if the goverment AND its people, cant fully support it and abide by it.Both, sabotaged the black community's progress and shaped its future and now blame them for the monster they created.
The way i see it, after slavery was abolished, there was only two viable choices.Either ship them ALL back to Africa,apologizing for all the crimes you have commited to their race for hundreds of years and compensate them somewhat.Or keep them in your country and offer them education and equal oppurtunities to rise and be helpfull,civilized members of society.The white society decided to pick option number 3, providing their communities with an abundancy of weapons and drugs (government) and at the same time denying them education, honest employment and fair social treatment (government and the people).

Napisano od Tik-Tok, 17.04.2014 at 10:47

Look at the arab scholars of the Dark Ages and their views upon African peoples. They are identical. If Slavery and Racialist states caused these issues, why did they exist in 800-1400AD? Quoted by Arab Geographers and Scholars? Dominant White Culture had a very positive influence on Black Americans. It wasn't until that dominance ended in the 1960s when Black issues became a major concern.

You seriously think that admitting you share the same beliefs with people that lived in the middle ages, is good for your case?Yes there is proof, that Africans (namely blacks) lived in underdeveloped and primitive societies in comparison to Western (whites).I will even agree if you conclude that based on this evidence, whites are smarter than blacks.There is not scientific evidence (i think) but there is historical evidence, i will give you that.But i dont care.Because i dont believe in the culling of the weak.Not only moraly but i also dont think, this is the best way to aproach this situation, even if the only things you care about is wealth,economy and social stability and order.Having provided these people with basic civil rights,education,employment,a fair and kind social treatment and im sure they could transform from a "burden" to an "asset" to any society.

Napisano od Tik-Tok, 17.04.2014 at 10:47

Its not down to white policeman or a 'racist' state. Police treat most people in a similar manner, which is usually terrible.

Actually this serves my point more than yours.As we know,genetics play a small and insignificant role, compared to the external influnces an individual has from its enviroment (family,school,society,other people,government and etc).Therefore, African American cops that show values of violence,hate,domination and corruption,every day, even against their fellow racial brothers, is proof, that you can shape an individual, however you want.If you grow up in the ghetto with no way out, you will most probably become a gang member, because that is the only way to survive,the only thing you see, the only way you know..

Napisano od Tik-Tok, 17.04.2014 at 10:47

So you cant provide a single legitimate positive to Multiculturalism other than the unprovable fear of nuclear war? Do you really think that the world will ever reach that point of social cohesion? Firstly, Multiculturalism is ONLY enforced upon White European cultures. Nowhere else in the world is this enforce. NOWHERE. Why should Europeans sacrifice their territory and culture for this idea of a species which has no intention of committing to the same social unity? A social unity which is literally impossible.

I did provide one..the most importand one actually.I think in the end the survival of our species, is the more importand thing.And yes i do believe the world is gonna end this way.And my opinion is based on facts, namely the increasing rate of nuclear weapons and the increasing tension between the "big" powers.
Also the advancement of our species, is another one.Because if you discriminate people, based on race,culture,religion,sexual orientation and etc you are keeping people and societies traped in little boxes and setting up for a backward society.
Multiculturalism is enforced to Europeans and Americans for a very simple reason.Because people like to live there.I dont know a lot of Europeans/Americans that want to relocate to Middle East,China or Russia.Unless alot of money is involved.And that is simply because,these societies dont provide them a happy life.And i dont mean only economically.They deny them basic civil rights that our society doesnt.And your suggestion is that we become more like them, so people will stop wanting to come here.Lol.
Well i have real suggestions in mind that would solve a lot of the problems that multiculturalism creates (if i can do it im pretty sure the governments can also.They simply dont want to, for whatever reasons) and i would go ahead and post them if it interests you.Some include, making "english" a requirement for anyone wanting to migrate to a country (or if you think thats globalization then change it to english for english speaking countries and for the rest the main language of that country), do something about religions (im not sure what, that needs extensive thinking and planning) because i think they are bigger reason for tension between races, than even the colour of ones skin, or where they come from.And border control (real control,that means no more allowing millions of mexicans and indians so they can work for 1 dollar an hour).

Napisano od Khal.eesi, 15.04.2014 at 10:02

Also i dont get how feminism destroyed the family structure.

That's because you didn't see what shit kind of shit happens in the USA. It's mainly in the west for now. Anyway corey is glad to help a lil, I know u luv him

Hitler's been bad to us. HEY GUYS, I KNOW. Let's take the same thing that has happened to us, and do it to other people!

Napisano od Unleasheds altt, 23.04.2014 at 13:54

Hitler's been bad to us. HEY GUYS, I KNOW. Let's take the same thing that has happened to us, and do it to other people!

Propaganda. The first map isn't Palestinian land, it is merely land not owned by Jews. At least half of it is public land owned by the British colonial government.

Second map was never an actual Palestine, it was proposed by the UN, accepted by the majority of members, and accepted by the Jews. Sadly, the Arabs, including the Palestinians, declined the deal and invaded the state instead.

The third map is not Palestine, the Gaza Strip is owned by Egypt and the West Bank (from which the Jews living there were expelled from) is owned by Jordan. Again, not Palestinian land or "Palestine".

The final map is the first time Palestine has been sovereign ever. Jews are not allowed to live in this land and Israeli citizens are forbidden from entering it. Meanwhile, 20% of Israel is Muslim Arab.

Hmm no reply from unleashed

Napisano od KYBL, 28.04.2014 at 08:28

Hmm no reply from unleashed

You are jewish, and a zionist.

Napisano od Unleashed, 28.04.2014 at 08:44

Napisano od KYBL, 28.04.2014 at 08:28

Hmm no reply from unleashed

You are jewish, and a zionist.

Wow what a great argument 10/10 you beat me

Napisano od KYBL, 28.04.2014 at 11:21

Napisano od Unleashed, 28.04.2014 at 08:44

Napisano od KYBL, 28.04.2014 at 08:28

Hmm no reply from unleashed

You are jewish, and a zionist.

Wow what a great argument 10/10 you beat me

It's pointless to argue you, because your opinions are decisively instilled within you, and there's no logical reason to even attempt to topple them. Your stance will never, ever change on this subject.

Napisano od Guest, 28.04.2014 at 13:48

Napisano od KYBL, 28.04.2014 at 11:21

Napisano od Unleashed, 28.04.2014 at 08:44

Napisano od KYBL, 28.04.2014 at 08:28

Hmm no reply from unleashed

You are jewish, and a zionist.

Wow what a great argument 10/10 you beat me

It's pointless to argue you, because your opinions are decisively instilled within you, and there's no logical reason to even attempt to topple them. Your stance will never, ever change on this subject.

I am a lot more pro- Palestinian than I was two years ago. Not that I am particularly pro-Palestinian, but I used to be very radical and I would never criticize Israel for their actions. Over time, my opinion developed debate after debate, research after research and I now support Palestinian independence and recognize that Netanyahu is a tyrannical fascist who is destroying the reputation of Israel.

Napisano od KYBL, 28.04.2014 at 14:03

Napisano od Guest, 28.04.2014 at 13:48

Napisano od KYBL, 28.04.2014 at 11:21

Napisano od Unleashed, 28.04.2014 at 08:44

Napisano od KYBL, 28.04.2014 at 08:28

Hmm no reply from unleashed

You are jewish, and a zionist.

Wow what a great argument 10/10 you beat me

It's pointless to argue you, because your opinions are decisively instilled within you, and there's no logical reason to even attempt to topple them. Your stance will never, ever change on this subject.

I am a lot more pro- Palestinian than I was two years ago. Not that I am particularly pro-Palestinian, but I used to be very radical and I would never criticize Israel for their actions. Over time, my opinion developed debate after debate, research after research and I now support Palestinian independence and recognize that Netanyahu is a tyrannical fascist who is destroying the reputation of Israel.

Than I retract my argument, but given that you never once told me this, I had no way to base my statement in a manner that suits your claim.

Napisano od Guest, 28.04.2014 at 14:54

Napisano od KYBL, 28.04.2014 at 14:03

Napisano od Guest, 28.04.2014 at 13:48

Napisano od KYBL, 28.04.2014 at 11:21

Napisano od Unleashed, 28.04.2014 at 08:44

Napisano od KYBL, 28.04.2014 at 08:28

Hmm no reply from unleashed

You are jewish, and a zionist.

Wow what a great argument 10/10 you beat me

It's pointless to argue you, because your opinions are decisively instilled within you, and there's no logical reason to even attempt to topple them. Your stance will never, ever change on this subject.

I am a lot more pro- Palestinian than I was two years ago. Not that I am particularly pro-Palestinian, but I used to be very radical and I would never criticize Israel for their actions. Over time, my opinion developed debate after debate, research after research and I now support Palestinian independence and recognize that Netanyahu is a tyrannical fascist who is destroying the reputation of Israel.

Than I retract my argument, but given that you never once told me this, I had no way to base my statement in a manner that suits your claim.

Respect for that

Napisano od Khal.eesi, 15.04.2014 at 07:01

Napisano od Tik-Tok, 15.04.2014 at 06:50

Napisano od Khal.eesi, 15.04.2014 at 06:11

Well i disagree with almost everything Tik believes and we are kind of the opposites in the political and social spectrum,but i believe he should be able to post his thoughts freely.For the "little kids are here" i think kids should be prepared to hear alot worst stuff than what Tik is saying.Real life is a lot harsher than this.Its not good to surround the young ones in a protective bubble.

Off topic isn't a safe for work forum. Let alone safe for kids. If Jizz covered photographs and endless streams of people calling one another faggots while posting 'loli' is allowed, why aren't crime statistics of ethnic groups?

I posted pictures of convicted anti-white criminals who shot and murdered white people for simply being white. They smiled for the photos, proud of their deeds. Imo, children should be more aware that there are ethnic groups that will target them.

Regardless, the posts broke no rules and they cant even quote me where I supposedly did. The definition of hate speech clearly outlines a call for violence. My posts spoke against the violence.

Well rascism is right next door,especially in Usa where this is literal.But not only white to black or the opposite.Los Angeles is under racial war, Latinos versus blacks.I remember a black mother,saying that she mooved to a better neighborhood for her son.Only she didnt research enough to know that this was a Latino owned neighborhood.Her teenage son was shot down,by Latinos, shortly after..

I have lived in both Los Angeles and Detroit.
To say Los Angeles is in a 'racial war' is untrue, but the media might portray it this way.
If it were a war, it is a small-scale, low-intensity conflict, AT BEST.

Detroit had 411 homicides in 2012 and Los Angeles had 294.
Detroit has about 700k people. Los Angeles has about 3.8 MILLION people.
In Detroit the person dying and the person pulling the trigger is overwhelmingly African American, and 82% of Detroit self-identifies as African American.
In Los Angeles, I don't claim to know the racial breakdown of killers and victims. But the population is >5 times that of Detroit, and the murder rate is tiny compared to Detroit.

(self-identified)
Los Angeles is about 11% Asian-American, 51% Hispanic or Latino, 10% African American, 29% Non-Hispanic White.
If there was a war, and it were race-based, and Hispanic/Latinos were belligerents, the war would be over, or certainly bloodier.

Detroit is a true border city - a half hour of walking takes you from Detroit to Canada.
Los Angeles is a 2-3 hour drive at 1AM to Mexico (and 5-7h on a bad traffic day if the border is jammed).

If one were to look at Los Angeles' violence as Mexico-based, one would need good evidence; I don't think that many would claim Detroit's murder rate is due to 'illegal Canadians' merely due to its border proximity.

Napisano od Tik-Tok, 15.04.2014 at 07:51

Napisano od Khal.eesi, 15.04.2014 at 07:40

well that leads to another discussion really.Because racial gangwars and crime is not a result of multiculturalism but a result of the corrupted government and the elite making money.Government and the elite busines class get alot out of this.Money from guns and weapons, money from drugs and etc Also justification for increased policing and surveilance,the general sense that the average citizen need police and goverment, removal of a very big percentage of "rebelious" population by declaring them outlaws and throwing them in jail and etc etc

Do you really think a nation like USA who is invading countries across the globe, could not stop the gangs if they really wanted to?

Not really, no. Diversity causes these issues. The Police State is a modern creation. It is the result of ineffective policing policies where all peoples are considered equal. Rather than having effective racial profiling and a population which can freely associate, everyone is forced together despite self segregation. The Police are forced to waste time filling quotas rather than tackling issues. They also cant properly enforce the law due to 'racism.' Nor do many communities take responsibility for their criminal youth.

Multi racial and multi ethnic communities always lead to this. The few places that dont like Singapore a Fascist city states that enforce the Law. I posted in another thread the damage that MultiCulturalism causes. There are studies on this that show it causes isolationism in people. It hurts social cohesion and promtoes criminal behaviour. Not to mention how Feminism affects this and destroys the family structure.

There is not a single positive argument for 'diversity' or leftist 'multiculturalism' outside of food, dnace and music. All of which can still be traded without mass immigration and loss of civil liberties.

Ive never heard anyone make a single positive argument for it. Not once.

As I remember, Nazi Germany was a police state, and people were not at all considered equal.
Police States arise in totalitarian/authoritarian governments, irrespective of 'racial profiling'.

In Western-style Societies, detection of crime, assignment of guilt and servicing of sanction are done via the state, not communities.
===
If "Multi racial and multi ethnic communities always lead to this" then why didn't Singapore?
Also, if Singapore is multi-cultural, tell me which countries are mono-cultural?

I think you know where I am going: I will point to a particular state, and if you deem it to be unsuccessful, it will be deemed 'multicultural'.
If it is 'clearly multicultural' AND successful (such as Singapore) you will deem it to be 'fascist' (which it isn't) or successful for some other reason than its multiculturalism.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_state

You're all gay

Napisano od bullet86, 07.06.2014 at 00:21

You're all gay

Yet in another post you said "being gay is cool". Now follow me on this (of course, you need to think so I realize I'm going to put you through a lot of effort)

So ok, we accept that. Being gay is normal. Now if being gay is normal, why do you get offended when people call you gay? So it's normal for others, but if you are called that, it suddenly becomes an insult? By getting offended, aren't you actually contradicting yourself when you said it's "cool, and normal"? Yes you are.

And now you contradict yourself once again by using it as derogatory. So which one is it, idiot? I'll tell you which one: you don't think

Napisano od Unleasheds Wrath, 07.06.2014 at 03:27

Napisano od bullet86, 07.06.2014 at 00:21

You're all gay

Yet in another post you said "being gay is cool". Now follow me on this (of course, you need to think so I realize I'm going to put you through a lot of effort)

So ok, we accept that. Being gay is normal. Now if being gay is normal, why do you get offended when people call you gay? So it's normal for others, but if you are called that, it suddenly becomes an insult? By getting offended, aren't you actually contradicting yourself when you said it's "cool, and normal"? Yes you are.

And now you contradict yourself once again by using it as derogatory. So which one is it, idiot? I'll tell you which one: you don't think

I said they're gay, I didn't say there's anything wrong with that . All you've just said is simple assumptions. I don't really take it as an insult when someone calls me gay,but when it's serious, I deny it, cuz well , it's not true.

You did more than denying it. You got offended

Everyone complains about this games community, but never do anything about it.This game would be much better if everyone just accepted that there a people who look, feel, and think differently then you (you as in all of you). Bringing up random things in the forums directed at ones beliefs or way of thinking will change nothing. They wont change the way they feel. If everyone just got along, this game would be much better.

Napisano od Nero, 07.06.2014 at 10:28

They wont change the way they feel. If everyone just got along, this game would be much better.

*puts philosopher hat on*

Getting along with everyone means you do not exist. You (you as in all of you) are a ghost. Ghosts can pretend to hug eachother, but once someone who is alive shows up the entire room lights up and they hate what they're seeing. They want him out of the room, and the room as dark as possible.