Reduce sp multiper for 50k games

The numbers of 50k games are too damn high, but the main reason is: You dont need skill because you can just spam units (tactics arent necessary)

You don't to manage your money immediately, but you need skill nonetheless. No.

Napisano od notserral, 06.08.2015 at 11:30

You don't to manage your money immediately, but you need skill nonetheless. No.

50k is too much. you can easy spam 500 units without skill.

Napisano od Lemonade, 06.08.2015 at 11:34

Napisano od notserral, 06.08.2015 at 11:30

You don't to manage your money immediately, but you need skill nonetheless. No.

50k is too much. you can easy spam 500 units without skill.

Predicting your opponent is a skill too. Regardless, we can't change the SP multiplier for game funds.

Napisano od notserral, 06.08.2015 at 11:37

Napisano od Lemonade, 06.08.2015 at 11:34

Napisano od notserral, 06.08.2015 at 11:30

You don't to manage your money immediately, but you need skill nonetheless. No.

50k is too much. you can easy spam 500 units without skill.

Predicting your opponent is a skill too. Regardless, we can't change the SP multiplier for game funds.

Why not? I think everybody noticed the amount of people playing 50k worldgames since the SP multiplier reduce on most of the SP farm maps.
Acq had proposed to make the 50k games premium and like maximum 25k for non premiums. Maybe thats a great way to start with and maybe we could work further or it could be good like that.

I won't say 50k doesnt take skills, but choosing india or japan and just spam shit tons of tanks is pretty OP, especially if RA.
The thing with this is most of those people in 50k don't really ''predict'' any moves, they just spam tanks and see who win, if they lose, they spam more tanks and more and more. Its like an endless spam, they will conquer more countries and won't get in negative income.

Napisano od Waffel, 06.08.2015 at 11:42

Napisano od notserral, 06.08.2015 at 11:37

Napisano od Lemonade, 06.08.2015 at 11:34

Napisano od notserral, 06.08.2015 at 11:30

You don't to manage your money immediately, but you need skill nonetheless. No.

50k is too much. you can easy spam 500 units without skill.

Predicting your opponent is a skill too. Regardless, we can't change the SP multiplier for game funds.

Why not? I think everybody noticed the amount of people playing 50k worldgames since the SP multiplier reduce on most of the SP farm maps.
Acq had proposed to make the 50k games premium and like maximum 25k for non premiums. Maybe thats a great way to start with and maybe we could work further or it could be good like that.

I won't say 50k doesnt take skills, but choosing india or japan and just spam shit tons of tanks is pretty OP, especially if RA.
The thing with this is most of those people in 50k don't really ''predict'' any moves, they just spam tanks and see who win, if they lose, they spam more tanks and more and more. Its like an endless spam, they will conquer more countries and won't get in negative income.

thx for you opinion

Napisano od Lemonade, 06.08.2015 at 11:44

Napisano od Waffel, 06.08.2015 at 11:42

Napisano od notserral, 06.08.2015 at 11:37

Napisano od Lemonade, 06.08.2015 at 11:34

Napisano od notserral, 06.08.2015 at 11:30

You don't to manage your money immediately, but you need skill nonetheless. No.

50k is too much. you can easy spam 500 units without skill.

Predicting your opponent is a skill too. Regardless, we can't change the SP multiplier for game funds.

Why not? I think everybody noticed the amount of people playing 50k worldgames since the SP multiplier reduce on most of the SP farm maps.
Acq had proposed to make the 50k games premium and like maximum 25k for non premiums. Maybe thats a great way to start with and maybe we could work further or it could be good like that.

I won't say 50k doesnt take skills, but choosing india or japan and just spam shit tons of tanks is pretty OP, especially if RA.
The thing with this is most of those people in 50k don't really ''predict'' any moves, they just spam tanks and see who win, if they lose, they spam more tanks and more and more. Its like an endless spam, they will conquer more countries and won't get in negative income.

thx for you opinion

Don't know if sarcastic or just real, either way thanks

It's fine just the way it is.

Dont change sp multiplier depending on game funds, I used to play 50k world, u need to use skill to win, most people blow out of their 50k in 8 turns then only have 5-10k cash left to spend with decreasing income, its either u kill ur main threats before they spam more than u or u die.

Napisano od Guest, 06.08.2015 at 12:03

Dont change sp multiplier depending on game funds, I used to play 50k world, u need to use skill to win, most people blow out of their 50k in 8 turns then only have 5-10k cash left to spend with decreasing income, its either u kill ur main threats before they spam more than u or u die.

you doesnt need skill when two rank 4 can overrun an rank 10

Napisano od Lemonade, 06.08.2015 at 12:24

Napisano od Guest, 06.08.2015 at 12:03

Dont change sp multiplier depending on game funds, I used to play 50k world, u need to use skill to win, most people blow out of their 50k in 8 turns then only have 5-10k cash left to spend with decreasing income, its either u kill ur main threats before they spam more than u or u die.

you doesnt need skill when two rank 4 can overrun an rank 10

Well rank 10's or any rank at all doesn't mean something these days tho. Most 3v3 rank 6's play better than average rank 10's from scenario community.

If you're jealous of people getting high sp from 50k games, then play the 50k games. Stop crying about it.

What about the people who like to play with expensive strategies??

No support

Napisano od Lemonade, 06.08.2015 at 12:24

you doesnt need skill when two rank 4 can overrun an rank 10

I doubt that ever happens...

Napisano od Creepy2324_deleted, 06.08.2015 at 13:04

What about the people who like to play with expensive strategies??

No support

You can play expensive strategies well in any funding.....

Napisano od Waffel, 06.08.2015 at 12:46

Well rank 10's or any rank at all doesn't mean something these days tho. Most 3v3 rank 6's play better than average rank 10's from scenario community.

Even in world games. There are a couple rank 6 and 7 players that make me take the game very seriously. Then there are other rank 8 and 9 that are a walk in the park.

We all know that in 50k games its not game 10 turns game.
Skill is starting to be worth after conquering all countries.
No support,you will just reduce number of games.

World games at least encourage expanding. Expanding is a pillar of atwar and expanding efficiently is a skill in itself. So if you were to set a multiplier it would have to higher than all of RPs.

I agree India is an OP country and its cost to buy it should be above 50k thus making it unpickable.

Napisano od Lemonade, 06.08.2015 at 12:24

Napisano od Guest, 06.08.2015 at 12:03

Dont change sp multiplier depending on game funds, I used to play 50k world, u need to use skill to win, most people blow out of their 50k in 8 turns then only have 5-10k cash left to spend with decreasing income, its either u kill ur main threats before they spam more than u or u die.

you doesnt need skill when two rank 4 can overrun an rank 10

Become a Solo player. No support.

[td]
[/td]

Napisano od Fockmeeard, 06.08.2015 at 22:06

World games at least encourage expanding. Expanding is a pillar of atwar and expanding efficiently is a skill in itself. So if you were to set a multiplier it would have to higher than all of RPs.

I agree India is an OP country and its cost to buy it should be above 50k thus making it unpickable.

India is easily defeated from China or Turkey in a 50k game, and high ranks rarely pick India.

Napisano od Lemonade, 06.08.2015 at 11:28

The numbers of 50k games are too damn high, but the main reason is: You dont need skill because you can just spam units (tactics arent necessary)

like spreading like aids and choosing batlles , setting prioritys wich to give up and wich to hold at a certain point aint tactics

U got pussy players on pussymaps and warmongors on world map

Napisano od Fockmeeard, 06.08.2015 at 22:06

World games at least encourage expanding. Expanding is a pillar of atwar and expanding efficiently is a skill in itself. So if you were to set a multiplier it would have to higher than all of RPs.

I agree India is an OP country and its cost to buy it should be above 50k thus making it unpickable.

I agree india is really OP.. but you can still defeat it if you know what you're doing and you're playing with the right strategy.

How ever, I don't think any thing should be changed.

Napisano od Lemonade, 06.08.2015 at 12:24

Napisano od Guest, 06.08.2015 at 12:03

Dont change sp multiplier depending on game funds, I used to play 50k world, u need to use skill to win, most people blow out of their 50k in 8 turns then only have 5-10k cash left to spend with decreasing income, its either u kill ur main threats before they spam more than u or u die.

you doesnt need skill when two rank 4 can overrun an rank 10

Any player getting double teamed like that can fail. Doesn't affect this argument at all.

No way.It must stay like it is and just to know world 50k is more competitive than anything.(if you dont allyfag ofc)