Cyprus is turk?

?

Edit: Cyprus is Turk.

Russian

Greek because turkey is gay

You and Andartes are trying to start flamewars with those kind of posts or what?

%90 Turk
%9 Serbian
%1 Arab

Napisano od Mobster, 22.02.2021 at 16:44

%90 Turk
%9 Serbian
%1 Arab

Wheres Greeks?

It's russian

Kurd

Napisano od Mauzer Panteri, 22.02.2021 at 16:55

Napisano od Mobster, 22.02.2021 at 16:44

%90 Turk
%9 Serbian
%1 Arab

Wheres Greeks?

What is Greeks?

UK and France

More British than Greek or Turk

Albanian.

Napisano od Alex, 22.02.2021 at 16:44

You and Andartes are trying to start flamewars with those kind of posts or what?

Are you trying to spread covid with that gif?

Turkey invaded Cyprus at 1974 and committed genocide against the Greek civilian population of the island. Since then he has been illegally occupying the northern part of the island. The legal owner of the island is its Greek inhabitants. Turkey has stolen much of Hellenism, from the Kurds, from the Assyrians from the Armenians. It is ridiculous to become such a gallop Turkey has no history has a criminal record!
Long live free Cyprus!!
we don't forget..

Napisano od Bella Ciao, 23.02.2021 at 12:16

Turkey invaded Cyprus at 1974 and committed genocide against the Greek civilian population of the island. Since then he has been illegally occupying the northern part of the island. The legal owner of the island is its Greek inhabitants. Turkey has stolen much of Hellenism, from the Kurds, from the Assyrians from the Armenians. It is ridiculous to become such a gallop Turkey has no history has a criminal record!
Long live free Cyprus!!
we don't forget..

Exactly, Turkey invaded EU country, younger brother of Greece which is NATO!

This is why Turkey can't join EU for 30 years, Germany blocks it due to Turkish unsettled conflict with Kipros, although France also sabotage Turkey in EU via Armenian Genocide Recognition.

But all this aside... most important question is: why United States, leader of NATO, didn't interfere or say anything in 1974 when its member invaded Kipros? This 'incident' created large instability in eastern NATO, which was bordering Warsaw Pact at the time.

Citat:

Exactly, Turkey invaded EU country, younger brother of Greece which is NATO!

This is why Turkey can't join EU for 30 years, Germany blocks it due to Turkish unsettled conflict with Kipros, although France also sabotage Turkey in EU via Armenian Genocide Recognition.

But all this aside... most important question is: why United States, leader of NATO, didn't interfere or say anything in 1974 when its member invaded Kipros? This 'incident' created large instability in eastern NATO, which was bordering Warsaw Pact at the time.

Because they allowed themselves to invade, Turkey would in no way enter the process of invading if it did not have the green light from the great powers, after all, at that time Greece was more weak than ever because there was a coup on the coup and brought a big crisis to the country's armed forces , so it was a good opportunity for Turkey to invade Cyprus with a weakened Greece, for which NATO is also responsible because it used its agents for the second coup in Greece for all this there are interviews and documents. Many say that it was a lesson to Greece because in 1969 when military leadership fell in Greece the full control of their country was exclusively from Greeks and not from the great powers.

Napisano od Bella Ciao, 24.02.2021 at 08:48

Because they allowed themselves to invade, Turkey would in no way enter the process of invading if it did not have the green light from the great powers, after all, at that time Greece was more weak than ever because there was a coup on the coup and brought a big crisis to the country's armed forces , so it was a good opportunity for Turkey to invade Cyprus with a weakened Greece, for which NATO is also responsible because it used its agents for the second coup in Greece for all this there are interviews and documents. Many say that it was a lesson to Greece because in 1969 when military leadership fell in Greece the full control of their country was exclusively from Greeks and not from the great powers.

Yeah and i don't understand why are they doing that, logical thing is to support both your allies, not support one and harm the other. That's illogical.

I remember when i lived in Greece, being pissed off every time when Turkish planes enter Greek airspace uninvated. I lived in Thraki which borders Turkey and almost every night Turks troll in the airspace, everyone was talking about that, pilots themselves said those who get night shifts always have to fly and intercept turkish raiders.

Citat:

Napisano od Bella Ciao, 24.02.2021 at 08:48

Exactly, Turkey invaded EU country, younger brother of Greece which is NATO!

This is why Turkey can't join EU for 30 years, Germany blocks it due to Turkish unsettled conflict with Kipros, although France also sabotage Turkey in EU via Armenian Genocide Recognition.

But all this aside... most important question is: why United States, leader of NATO, didn't interfere or say anything in 1974 when its member invaded Kipros? This 'incident' created large instability in eastern NATO, which was bordering Warsaw Pact at the time.

Because they allowed themselves to invade, Turkey would in no way enter the process of invading if it did not have the green light from the great powers, after all, at that time Greece was more weak than ever because there was a coup on the coup and brought a big crisis to the country's armed forces , so it was a good opportunity for Turkey to invade Cyprus with a weakened Greece, for which NATO is also responsible because it used its agents for the second coup in Greece for all this there are interviews and documents. Many say that it was a lesson to Greece because in 1969 when military leadership fell in Greece the full control of their country was exclusively from Greeks and not from the great powers.

So, Makarios and junta did nothing to trigger Cyprus War, as the first didn't try to abuse rights of Turkish Cypriots and the latter didn't push for Enosis

Greek junta tried to interfir in Cyprus with a coup and military invasion and turkey reacted to protect the Turkish minority rest is history.

Napisano od JUGERS2, 24.02.2021 at 12:44

Greek junta tried to interfir in Cyprus with a coup and military invasion and turkey reacted to protect the Turkish minority rest is history.

A'ight, same as Ukraine junta tried to instigate a coup and Russia reacted to protect russian minority, the rest is history. Or when Albania tried to break Kosovo from Serbia and Serbia interfered to protect citizens.

Napisano od JUGERS2, 24.02.2021 at 12:44

Greek junta tried to interfir in Cyprus with a coup and military invasion and turkey reacted to protect the Turkish minority rest is history.

Stop talking bulshits, also stop lick turkey's balls..
That's not history never happened idk what are you doing, I hope you trolling.

Napisano od Bella Ciao, 24.02.2021 at 13:23

Napisano od JUGERS2, 24.02.2021 at 12:44

Greek junta tried to interfir in Cyprus with a coup and military invasion and turkey reacted to protect the Turkish minority rest is history.

Stop talking bulshits, also stop lick turkey's balls..
That's not history never happened idk what are you doing, I hope you trolling.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1974_Cypriot_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat

The 1974 coup d'état in Cyprus was a military coup d'état by the Greek Army in Cyprus, the Cypriot National Guard and the Greek military junta of 1967-1974. On 15 July 1974 the coup plotters ousted President Makarios III and replaced him with pro-Enosis (Greek irridentist) nationalist Nikos Sampson as replaced president, only for 2 days.[1][2][3] The Sampson regime was described as a puppet state, whose ultimate aim was the annexation of the island by Greece;[4][5][6] in the short term, the coupists proclaimed the establishment of the "Hellenic Republic of Cyprus".[7][8] The coup was viewed as illegal by the United Nations and violated human rights laws.

Citat:

Napisano od Metyu, 24.02.2021 at 12:43

Napisano od Bella Ciao, 24.02.2021 at 08:48

Exactly, Turkey invaded EU country, younger brother of Greece which is NATO!

This is why Turkey can't join EU for 30 years, Germany blocks it due to Turkish unsettled conflict with Kipros, although France also sabotage Turkey in EU via Armenian Genocide Recognition.

But all this aside... most important question is: why United States, leader of NATO, didn't interfere or say anything in 1974 when its member invaded Kipros? This 'incident' created large instability in eastern NATO, which was bordering Warsaw Pact at the time.

Because they allowed themselves to invade, Turkey would in no way enter the process of invading if it did not have the green light from the great powers, after all, at that time Greece was more weak than ever because there was a coup on the coup and brought a big crisis to the country's armed forces , so it was a good opportunity for Turkey to invade Cyprus with a weakened Greece, for which NATO is also responsible because it used its agents for the second coup in Greece for all this there are interviews and documents. Many say that it was a lesson to Greece because in 1969 when military leadership fell in Greece the full control of their country was exclusively from Greeks and not from the great powers.

So, Makarios and junta did nothing to trigger Cyprus War, as the first didn't try to abuse rights of Turkish Cypriots and the latter didn't push for Enosis

First of all Makarios was an traitor he never wants enosis with the Greece ,he just wanted Cyprus independent country.
Now about junta, in Greece the junta started in 1967 with Georgios Papadopoulos as leader. After the Polytechnic uprising in November 1973 and its violent repression, a new coup under Ioannidis overthrew Papadopoulos. Ioannidis was an instigator of the USA government, his goal was to overthrow the junta and re-create a new one, but completely different from the previous one, in short, he was a traitor.
In Greece, when the junta took place, Papadopoulos cut off all cooperation with the United States because he did not trust it in any case, this had the strong reaction of the United States, where it began to have a friendly -Turkish direction. For 7 years the USA operated dirty and aimed at the fall of the dictatorship of papadopoulos, so it used ioannidis to supply him with weapons and agents.
Ioannidis in November 1973 led the new coup, Turkey invaded in Cuprus at 1974 20 july It was the right time for Turkey to invade Cyprus, because Greece had all kinds of political problems and a crisis prevailed, and most importantly with a dictator who acted in the interests of the USA.
The attitude of USA could be characterized as a good lesson in Greece, because it does not obey at USA orders.
Ιn 1974 turkey committed a crime in which all the great powers were spectators.

Calling Makarios a traitor is very dangerous, shows pro junta ideology. He was a man ahead of his time, saw a way that both Greeks and Turks could live together like brothers with respect and equality bewteen eachother. We need a Makarios in both sides of the island nowdays so this divide stops. If he was of what you call him a "traitor" they wouldn't give his name to biggest hospital of Nicosia. For the Cyprus people, Greek or Turk, he was the father of the nation, respected from both,loved from both, something noone else has and will achieve. I wish we had more leaders like him in every country.

Its turkish for turks ,greek for greeks but they sold Cyprus to russian oligarchs

Citat:

Napisano od Bella Ciao, 24.02.2021 at 17:40

Napisano od Metyu, 24.02.2021 at 12:43

Napisano od Bella Ciao, 24.02.2021 at 08:48

Exactly, Turkey invaded EU country, younger brother of Greece which is NATO!

This is why Turkey can't join EU for 30 years, Germany blocks it due to Turkish unsettled conflict with Kipros, although France also sabotage Turkey in EU via Armenian Genocide Recognition.

But all this aside... most important question is: why United States, leader of NATO, didn't interfere or say anything in 1974 when its member invaded Kipros? This 'incident' created large instability in eastern NATO, which was bordering Warsaw Pact at the time.

Because they allowed themselves to invade, Turkey would in no way enter the process of invading if it did not have the green light from the great powers, after all, at that time Greece was more weak than ever because there was a coup on the coup and brought a big crisis to the country's armed forces , so it was a good opportunity for Turkey to invade Cyprus with a weakened Greece, for which NATO is also responsible because it used its agents for the second coup in Greece for all this there are interviews and documents. Many say that it was a lesson to Greece because in 1969 when military leadership fell in Greece the full control of their country was exclusively from Greeks and not from the great powers.

So, Makarios and junta did nothing to trigger Cyprus War, as the first didn't try to abuse rights of Turkish Cypriots and the latter didn't push for Enosis

First of all Makarios was an traitor he never wants enosis with the Greece ,he just wanted Cyprus independent country.
Now about junta, in Greece the junta started in 1967 with Georgios Papadopoulos as leader. After the Polytechnic uprising in November 1973 and its violent repression, a new coup under Ioannidis overthrew Papadopoulos. Ioannidis was an instigator of the USA government, his goal was to overthrow the junta and re-create a new one, but completely different from the previous one, in short, he was a traitor.
In Greece, when the junta took place, Papadopoulos cut off all cooperation with the United States because he did not trust it in any case, this had the strong reaction of the United States, where it began to have a friendly -Turkish direction. For 7 years the USA operated dirty and aimed at the fall of the dictatorship of papadopoulos, so it used ioannidis to supply him with weapons and agents.
Ioannidis in November 1973 led the new coup, Turkey invaded in Cuprus at 1974 20 july It was the right time for Turkey to invade Cyprus, because Greece had all kinds of political problems and a crisis prevailed, and most importantly with a dictator who acted in the interests of the USA.
The attitude of USA could be characterized as a good lesson in Greece, because it does not obey at USA orders.
Ιn 1974 turkey committed a crime in which all the great powers were spectators.

You forgot to mention acts of EOKA and EOKA B purposely that shows how biased you are.

Citat:

Napisano od Metyu, 25.02.2021 at 07:33

Napisano od Bella Ciao, 24.02.2021 at 17:40

Napisano od Metyu, 24.02.2021 at 12:43

Napisano od Bella Ciao, 24.02.2021 at 08:48

Exactly, Turkey invaded EU country, younger brother of Greece which is NATO!

This is why Turkey can't join EU for 30 years, Germany blocks it due to Turkish unsettled conflict with Kipros, although France also sabotage Turkey in EU via Armenian Genocide Recognition.

But all this aside... most important question is: why United States, leader of NATO, didn't interfere or say anything in 1974 when its member invaded Kipros? This 'incident' created large instability in eastern NATO, which was bordering Warsaw Pact at the time.

Because they allowed themselves to invade, Turkey would in no way enter the process of invading if it did not have the green light from the great powers, after all, at that time Greece was more weak than ever because there was a coup on the coup and brought a big crisis to the country's armed forces , so it was a good opportunity for Turkey to invade Cyprus with a weakened Greece, for which NATO is also responsible because it used its agents for the second coup in Greece for all this there are interviews and documents. Many say that it was a lesson to Greece because in 1969 when military leadership fell in Greece the full control of their country was exclusively from Greeks and not from the great powers.

So, Makarios and junta did nothing to trigger Cyprus War, as the first didn't try to abuse rights of Turkish Cypriots and the latter didn't push for Enosis

First of all Makarios was an traitor he never wants enosis with the Greece ,he just wanted Cyprus independent country.
Now about junta, in Greece the junta started in 1967 with Georgios Papadopoulos as leader. After the Polytechnic uprising in November 1973 and its violent repression, a new coup under Ioannidis overthrew Papadopoulos. Ioannidis was an instigator of the USA government, his goal was to overthrow the junta and re-create a new one, but completely different from the previous one, in short, he was a traitor.
In Greece, when the junta took place, Papadopoulos cut off all cooperation with the United States because he did not trust it in any case, this had the strong reaction of the United States, where it began to have a friendly -Turkish direction. For 7 years the USA operated dirty and aimed at the fall of the dictatorship of papadopoulos, so it used ioannidis to supply him with weapons and agents.
Ioannidis in November 1973 led the new coup, Turkey invaded in Cuprus at 1974 20 july It was the right time for Turkey to invade Cyprus, because Greece had all kinds of political problems and a crisis prevailed, and most importantly with a dictator who acted in the interests of the USA.
The attitude of USA could be characterized as a good lesson in Greece, because it does not obey at USA orders.
Ιn 1974 turkey committed a crime in which all the great powers were spectators.

You forgot to mention acts of EOKA and EOKA B purposely that shows how biased you are.

The forces of EOKA wanted the union with Greece, it was logical from the moment that the island of Cyprus is a part of Greece, before all this happened The population of Cyprus before the Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974 its population consisted of 78% Greek Cypriots and 18% Turkish Cypriots and the remaining 4% were from other ethnicities. The strange thing here and the unspeakably crazy is that Turkey is talking about peace acts and wants to pretend to be a savior of civilians while all it has done for years is enslavement, committing genocides and stealing territory from other countries.

Napisano od JUGERS2, 24.02.2021 at 21:34

Calling Makarios a traitor is very dangerous, shows pro junta ideology. He was a man ahead of his time, saw a way that both Greeks and Turks could live together like brothers with respect and equality bewteen eachother. We need a Makarios in both sides of the island nowdays so this divide stops. If he was of what you call him a "traitor" they wouldn't give his name to biggest hospital of Nicosia. For the Cyprus people, Greek or Turk, he was the father of the nation, respected from both,loved from both, something noone else has and will achieve. I wish we had more leaders like him in every country.

I don't disagree at all, but u can see now 1 part who called Cyprus and 1 part who called Turkish Cyprus.. There's no where Greek part of Cyprus.. How u explain that why not Greek part of Cyprus?? Until today 70% of population is Greek Cypriots, That's why I blame makarios and EOKA too... Big mistakes from Greece.. However, until today the Northern part of Cyprus is not recognized, it is still in a state of invasion. Also England and USA knows better their criminals..

Citat:

Napisano od Metyu, 25.02.2021 at 07:33

Napisano od Bella Ciao, 24.02.2021 at 17:40

Napisano od Metyu, 24.02.2021 at 12:43

Napisano od Bella Ciao, 24.02.2021 at 08:48

Exactly, Turkey invaded EU country, younger brother of Greece which is NATO!

This is why Turkey can't join EU for 30 years, Germany blocks it due to Turkish unsettled conflict with Kipros, although France also sabotage Turkey in EU via Armenian Genocide Recognition.

But all this aside... most important question is: why United States, leader of NATO, didn't interfere or say anything in 1974 when its member invaded Kipros? This 'incident' created large instability in eastern NATO, which was bordering Warsaw Pact at the time.

Because they allowed themselves to invade, Turkey would in no way enter the process of invading if it did not have the green light from the great powers, after all, at that time Greece was more weak than ever because there was a coup on the coup and brought a big crisis to the country's armed forces , so it was a good opportunity for Turkey to invade Cyprus with a weakened Greece, for which NATO is also responsible because it used its agents for the second coup in Greece for all this there are interviews and documents. Many say that it was a lesson to Greece because in 1969 when military leadership fell in Greece the full control of their country was exclusively from Greeks and not from the great powers.

So, Makarios and junta did nothing to trigger Cyprus War, as the first didn't try to abuse rights of Turkish Cypriots and the latter didn't push for Enosis

First of all Makarios was an traitor he never wants enosis with the Greece ,he just wanted Cyprus independent country.
Now about junta, in Greece the junta started in 1967 with Georgios Papadopoulos as leader. After the Polytechnic uprising in November 1973 and its violent repression, a new coup under Ioannidis overthrew Papadopoulos. Ioannidis was an instigator of the USA government, his goal was to overthrow the junta and re-create a new one, but completely different from the previous one, in short, he was a traitor.
In Greece, when the junta took place, Papadopoulos cut off all cooperation with the United States because he did not trust it in any case, this had the strong reaction of the United States, where it began to have a friendly -Turkish direction. For 7 years the USA operated dirty and aimed at the fall of the dictatorship of papadopoulos, so it used ioannidis to supply him with weapons and agents.
Ioannidis in November 1973 led the new coup, Turkey invaded in Cuprus at 1974 20 july It was the right time for Turkey to invade Cyprus, because Greece had all kinds of political problems and a crisis prevailed, and most importantly with a dictator who acted in the interests of the USA.
The attitude of USA could be characterized as a good lesson in Greece, because it does not obey at USA orders.
Ιn 1974 turkey committed a crime in which all the great powers were spectators.

You forgot to mention acts of EOKA and EOKA B purposely that shows how biased you are.

He calls traitor Makarios for having Europian mentality and being against EOKA. He is a junta supporter, doesn't want democracy but opression. Very few Greeks think like that. In modern state of Cyprus Makarios is treated with biggest respect for what he tried to achieve, a unified state where there would be no difference between Turks and Greeks but they would be living together in peace. After the invasion every single politician of Cyprus tries to achieve that but has failed to do so. Maybe it's because Makarios was a priest and not a politician.